History Of The Decline And Fall Of The Roman Empire

Edward Gibbon, Esq.

With notes by the Rev. H. H. Milman

Vol. 4

1782 (Written), 1845 (Revised)

Chapter XXXIX: Gothic Kingdom Of Italy.

Part I.

     Zeno And Anastasius, Emperors Of The East. - Birth,

Education, And First Exploits Of Theodoric The Ostrogoth. - His

Invasion And Conquest Of Italy. - The Gothic Kingdom Of Italy. -

State Of The West. - Military And Civil Government. - The Senator

Boethius. - Last Acts And Death Of Theodoric.

     After the fall of the Roman empire in the West, an interval

of fifty years, till the memorable reign of Justinian, is faintly

marked by the obscure names and imperfect annals of Zeno,

Anastasius, and Justin, who successively ascended to the throne

of Constantinople.  During the same period, Italy revived and

flourished under the government of a Gothic king, who might have

deserved a statue among the best and bravest of the ancient

Romans.

     Theodoric the Ostrogoth, the fourteenth in lineal descent of

the royal line of the Amali, ^1 was born in the neighborhood of

Vienna ^2 two years after the death of Attila. ^! A recent

victory had restored the independence of the Ostrogoths; and the

three brothers, Walamir, Theodemir, and Widimir, who ruled that

warlike nation with united counsels, had separately pitched their

habitations in the fertile though desolate province of Pannonia.

The Huns still threatened their revolted subjects, but their

hasty attack was repelled by the single forces of Walamir, and

the news of his victory reached the distant camp of his brother

in the same auspicious moment that the favorite concubine of

Theodemir was delivered of a son and heir.  In the eighth year of

his age, Theodoric was reluctantly yielded by his father to the

public interest, as the pledge of an alliance which Leo, emperor

of the East, had consented to purchase by an annual subsidy of

three hundred pounds of gold.  The royal hostage was educated at

Constantinople with care and tenderness.  His body was formed to

all the exercises of war, his mind was expanded by the habits of

liberal conversation; he frequented the schools of the most

skilful masters; but he disdained or neglected the arts of

Greece, and so ignorant did he always remain of the first

elements of science, that a rude mark was contrived to represent

the signature of the illiterate king of Italy. ^3 As soon as he

had attained the age of eighteen, he was restored to the wishes

of the Ostrogoths, whom the emperor aspired to gain by liberality

and confidence.  Walamir had fallen in battle; the youngest of

the brothers, Widimir, had led away into Italy and Gaul an army

of Barbarians, and the whole nation acknowledged for their king

the father of Theodoric.  His ferocious subjects admired the

strength and stature of their young prince; ^4 and he soon

convinced them that he had not degenerated from the valor of his

ancestors.  At the head of six thousand volunteers, he secretly

left the camp in quest of adventures, descended the Danube as far

as Singidunum, or Belgrade, and soon returned to his father with

the spoils of a Sarmatian king whom he had vanquished and slain.

Such triumphs, however, were productive only of fame, and the

invincible Ostrogoths were reduced to extreme distress by the

want of clothing and food.  They unanimously resolved to desert

their Pannonian encampments, and boldly to advance into the warm

and wealthy neighborhood of the Byzantine court, which already

maintained in pride and luxury so many bands of confederate

Goths.  After proving, by some acts of hostility, that they could

be dangerous, or at least troublesome, enemies, the Ostrogoths

sold at a high price their reconciliation and fidelity, accepted

a donative of lands and money, and were intrusted with the

defence of the Lower Danube, under the command of Theodoric, who

succeeded after his father's death to the hereditary throne of

the Amali. ^5

[Footnote 1: Jornandes (de Rebus Geticis, c. 13, 14, p. 629, 630,

edit. Grot.) has drawn the pedigree of Theodoric from Gapt, one

of the Anses or Demigods, who lived about the time of Domitian.

Cassiodorus, the first who celebrates the royal race of the

Amali, (Viriar. viii. 5, ix. 25, x. 2, xi. 1,) reckons the

grandson of Theodoric as the xviith in descent.  Peringsciold

(the Swedish commentator of Cochloeus, Vit. Theodoric. p. 271,

&c., Stockholm, 1699) labors to connect this genealogy with the

legends or traditions of his native country.

     Note: Amala was a name of hereditary sanctity and honor

among the Visigoths.  It enters into the names of Amalaberga,

Amala suintha, (swinther means strength,) Amalafred, Amalarich.

In the poem of the Nibelungen written three hundred years later,

the Ostrogoths are called the Amilungen. According to Wachter it

means, unstained, from the privative a, and malo a stain.  It is

pure Sanscrit, Amala, immaculatus.  Schlegel. Indische

Bibliothek, 1. p. 233. - M.]

[Footnote 2: More correctly on the banks of the Lake Pelso,

(Nieusiedler- see,) near Carnuntum, almost on the same spot where

Marcus Antoninus composed his meditations, (Jornandes, c. 52, p.

659.  Severin. Pannonia Illustrata, p. 22.  Cellarius, Geograph.

Antiq. (tom. i. p. 350.)]

[Footnote !: The date of Theodoric's birth is not accurately

determined. We can hardly err, observes Manso, in placing it

between the years 453 and 455, Manso, Geschichte des Ost

Gothischen Reichs, p. 14. - M.]

[Footnote 3: The four first letters of his name were inscribed on

a gold plate, and when it was fixed on the paper, the king drew

his pen through the intervals (Anonym. Valesian. ad calcem Amm.

Marcellin p. 722.) This authentic fact, with the testimony of

Procopius, or at least of the contemporary Goths, (Gothic. 1. i.

c. 2, p. 311,) far outweighs the vague praises of Ennodius

(Sirmond Opera, tom. i. p. 1596) and Theophanes, (Chronograph. p.

112.)

     Note: Le Beau and his Commentator, M. St. Martin, support,

though with no very satisfactory evidence, the opposite opinion.

But Lord Mahon (Life of Belisarius, p. 19) urges the much

stronger argument, the Byzantine education of Theodroic. - M.]

[Footnote 4: Statura est quae resignet proceritate regnantem,

(Ennodius, p. 1614.) The bishop of Pavia (I mean the ecclesiastic

who wished to be a bishop) then proceeds to celebrate the

complexion, eyes, hands, &c, of his sovereign.]

[Footnote 5: The state of the Ostrogoths, and the first years of

Theodoric, are found in Jornandes, (c. 52 - 56, p. 689 - 696) and

Malchus, (Excerpt. Legat. p. 78 - 80,) who erroneously styles him

the son of Walamir.]

     A hero, descended from a race of kings, must have despised

the base Isaurian who was invested with the Roman purple, without

any endowment of mind or body, without any advantages of royal

birth, or superior qualifications. After the failure of the

Theodosian life, the choice of Pulcheria and of the senate might

be justified in some measure by the characters of Martin and Leo,

but the latter of these princes confirmed and dishonored his

reign by the perfidious murder of Aspar and his sons, who too

rigorously exacted the debt of gratitude and obedience.  The

inheritance of Leo and of the East was peaceably devolved on his

infant grandson, the son of his daughter Ariadne; and her

Isaurian husband, the fortunate Trascalisseus, exchanged that

barbarous sound for the Grecian appellation of Zeno.  After the

decease of the elder Leo, he approached with unnatural respect

the throne of his son, humbly received, as a gift, the second

rank in the empire, and soon excited the public suspicion on the

sudden and premature death of his young colleague, whose life

could no longer promote the success of his ambition.  But the

palace of Constantinople was ruled by female influence, and

agitated by female passions: and Verina, the widow of Leo,

claiming his empire as her own, pronounced a sentence of

deposition against the worthless and ungrateful servant on whom

she alone had bestowed the sceptre of the East. ^6 As soon as she

sounded a revolt in the ears of Zeno, he fled with precipitation

into the mountains of Isauria, and her brother Basiliscus,

already infamous by his African expedition, ^7 was unanimously

proclaimed by the servile senate.  But the reign of the usurper

was short and turbulent. Basiliscus presumed to assassinate the

lover of his sister; he dared to offend the lover of his wife,

the vain and insolent Harmatius, who, in the midst of Asiatic

luxury, affected the dress, the demeanor, and the surname of

Achilles. ^8 By the conspiracy of the malecontents, Zeno was

recalled from exile; the armies, the capital, the person, of

Basiliscus, were betrayed; and his whole family was condemned to

the long agony of cold and hunger by the inhuman conqueror, who

wanted courage to encounter or to forgive his enemies. ^* The

haughty spirit of Verina was still incapable of submission or

repose. She provoked the enmity of a favorite general, embraced

his cause as soon as he was disgraced, created a new emperor in

Syria and Egypt, ^* raised an army of seventy thousand men, and

persisted to the last moment of her life in a fruitless

rebellion, which, according to the fashion of the age, had been

predicted by Christian hermits and Pagan magicians.  While the

East was afflicted by the passions of Verina, her daughter

Ariadne was distinguished by the female virtues of mildness and

fidelity; she followed her husband in his exile, and after his

restoration, she implored his clemency in favor of her mother.

On the decease of Zeno, Ariadne, the daughter, the mother, and

the widow of an emperor, gave her hand and the Imperial title to

Anastasius, an aged domestic of the palace, who survived his

elevation above twenty-seven years, and whose character is

attested by the acclamation of the people, "Reign as you have

lived!" ^9 ^!

[Footnote 6: Theophanes (p. 111) inserts a copy of her sacred

letters to the provinces.  Such female pretensions would have

astonished the slaves of the first Caesars.]

[Footnote 7: Vol. iii. p. 504 - 508.]

[Footnote 8: Suidas, tom. i. p. 332, 333, edit. Kuster.]

[Footnote *: Joannes Lydus accuses Zeno of timidity, or, rather,

of cowardice; he purchased an ignominious peace from the enemies

of the empire, whom he dared not meet in battle; and employed his

whole time at home in confiscations and executions.  Lydus, de

Magist. iii. 45, p. 230. - M.]

[Footnote *: Named Illus. - M.]

[Footnote 9: The contemporary histories of Malchus and Candidus

are lost; but some extracts or fragments have been saved by

Photius, (lxxviii. lxxix. p. 100 - 102,) Constantine

Porphyrogenitus, (Excerpt. Leg. p. 78 - 97,) and in various

articles of the Lexicon of Suidas.  The Chronicles of Marcellinus

(Imago Historiae) are originals for the reigns of Zeno and

Anastasius; and I must acknowledge, almost for the last time, my

obligations to the large and accurate collections of Tillemont,

(Hist. des Emp. tom. vi. p. 472 - 652).]

[Footnote !: The Panegyric of Procopius of Gaza, (edited by

Villoison in his Anecdota Graeca, and reprinted in the new

edition of the Byzantine historians by Niebuhr, in the same vol.

with Dexippus and Eunapius, viii. p. 488 516,) was unknown to

Gibbon.  It is vague and pedantic, and contains few facts.  The

same criticism will apply to the poetical panegyric of Priscian

edited from the Ms. of Bobbio by Ang. Mai.  Priscian, the gram

marian, Niebuhr argues from this work, must have been born in the

African, not in either of the Asiatic Caesareas.  Pref. p. xi. -

M.]

     Whatever fear of affection could bestow, was profusely

lavished by Zeno on the king of the Ostrogoths; the rank of

patrician and consul, the command of the Palatine troops, an

equestrian statue, a treasure in gold and silver of many thousand

pounds, the name of son, and the promise of a rich and honorable

wife.  As long as Theodoric condescended to serve, he supported

with courage and fidelity the cause of his benefactor; his rapid

march contributed to the restoration of Zeno; and in the second

revolt, the Walamirs, as they were called, pursued and pressed

the Asiatic rebels, till they left an easy victory to the

Imperial troops. ^10 But the faithful servant was suddenly

converted into a formidable enemy, who spread the flames of war

from Constantinople to the Adriatic; many flourishing cities were

reduced to ashes, and the agriculture of Thrace was almost

extirpated by the wanton cruelty of the Goths, who deprived their

captive peasants of the right hand that guided the plough. ^11 On

such occasions, Theodoric sustained the loud and specious

reproach of disloyalty, of ingratitude, and of insatiate avarice,

which could be only excused by the hard necessity of his

situation. He reigned, not as the monarch, but as the minister of

a ferocious people, whose spirit was unbroken by slavery, and

impatient of real or imaginary insults.  Their poverty was

incurable; since the most liberal donatives were soon dissipated

in wasteful luxury, and the most fertile estates became barren in

their hands; they despised, but they envied, the laborious

provincials; and when their subsistence had failed, the

Ostrogoths embraced the familiar resources of war and rapine.  It

had been the wish of Theodoric (such at least was his

declaration) to lead a peaceful, obscure, obedient life on the

confines of Scythia, till the Byzantine court, by splendid and

fallacious promises, seduced him to attack a confederate tribe of

Goths, who had been engaged in the party of Basiliscus.  He

marched from his station in Maesia, on the solemn assurance that

before he reached Adrianople, he should meet a plentiful convoy

of provisions, and a reenforcement of eight thousand horse and

thirty thousand foot, while the legions of Asia were encamped at

Heraclea to second his operations.  These measures were

disappointed by mutual jealousy.  As he advanced into Thrace, the

son of Theodemir found an inhospitable solitude, and his Gothic

followers, with a heavy train of horses, of mules, and of wagons,

were betrayed by their guides among the rocks and precipices of

Mount Sondis, where he was assaulted by the arms and invectives

of Theodoric the son of Triarius.  From a neighboring height, his

artful rival harangued the camp of the Walamirs, and branded

their leader with the opprobrious names of child, of madman, of

perjured traitor, the enemy of his blood and nation.  "Are you

ignorant," exclaimed the son of Triarius, "that it is the

constant policy of the Romans to destroy the Goths by each

other's swords?  Are you insensible that the victor in this

unnatural contest will be exposed, and justly exposed, to their

implacable revenge?  Where are those warriors, my kinsmen and thy

own, whose widows now lament that their lives were sacrificed to

thy rash ambition?  Where is the wealth which thy soldiers

possessed when they were first allured from their native homes to

enlist under thy standard?  Each of them was then master of three

or four horses; they now follow thee on foot, like slaves,

through the deserts of Thrace; those men who were tempted by the

hope of measuring gold with a bushel, those brave men who are as

free and as noble as thyself." A language so well suited to the

temper of the Goths excited clamor and discontent; and the son of

Theodemir, apprehensive of being left alone, was compelled to

embrace his brethren, and to imitate the example of Roman

perfidy. ^12 ^*

[Footnote 10: In ipsis congressionis tuae foribus cessit invasor,

cum profugo per te sceptra redderentur de salute dubitanti.

Ennodius then proceeds (p. 1596, 1597, tom. i. Sirmond.) to

transport his hero (on a flying dragon?) into Aethiopia, beyond

the tropic of Cancer.  The evidence of the Valesian Fragment, (p.

717,) Liberatus, (Brev. Eutych. c. 25 p. 118,) and Theophanes,

(p. 112,) is more sober and rational.]

[Footnote 11: This cruel practice is specially imputed to the

Triarian Goths, less barbarous, as it should seem, than the

Walamirs; but the son of Theodemir is charged with the ruin of

many Roman cities, (Malchus, Excerpt. Leg. p. 95.)]

[Footnote 12: Jornandes (c. 56, 57, p. 696) displays the services

of Theodoric, confesses his rewards, but dissembles his revolt,

of which such curious details have been preserved by Malchus,

(Excerpt. Legat. p. 78 - 97.) Marcellinus, a domestic of

Justinian, under whose ivth consulship (A.D. 534) he composed his

Chronicle, (Scaliger, Thesaurus Temporum, P. ii, p. 34 - 57,)

betrays his prejudice and passion: in Graeciam debacchantem

...Zenonis munificentia pene pacatus ...beneficiis nunquam

satiatus, &c.]

[Footnote *: Gibbon has omitted much of the complicated intrigues

of the Byzantine court with the two Theodorics.  The weak emperor

attempted to play them one against the other, and was himself in

turn insulted, and the empire ravaged, by both.  The details of

the successive alliance and revolt, of hostility and of union,

between the two Gothic chieftains, to dictate terms to the

emperor, may be found in Malchus. - M.]

     In every state of his fortune, the prudence and firmness of

Theodoric were equally conspicuous; whether he threatened

Constantinople at the head of the confederate Goths, or retreated

with a faithful band to the mountains and sea-coast of Epirus.

At length the accidental death of the son of Triarius ^13

destroyed the balance which the Romans had been so anxious to

preserve, the whole nation acknowledged the supremacy of the

Amali, and the Byzantine court subscribed an ignominious and

oppressive treaty. ^14 The senate had already declared, that it

was necessary to choose a party among the Goths, since the public

was unequal to the support of their united forces; a subsidy of

two thousand pounds of gold, with the ample pay of thirteen

thousand men, were required for the least considerable of their

armies; ^15 and the Isaurians, who guarded not the empire but the

emperor, enjoyed, besides the privilege of rapine, an annual

pension of five thousand pounds.  The sagacious mind of Theodoric

soon perceived that he was odious to the Romans, and suspected by

the Barbarians: he understood the popular murmur, that his

subjects were exposed in their frozen huts to intolerable

hardships, while their king was dissolved in the luxury of

Greece, and he prevented the painful alternative of encountering

the Goths, as the champion, or of leading them to the field, as

the enemy, of Zeno.  Embracing an enterprise worthy of his

courage and ambition, Theodoric addressed the emperor in the

following words: "Although your servant is maintained in

affluence by your liberality, graciously listen to the wishes of

my heart!  Italy, the inheritance of your predecessors, and Rome

itself, the head and mistress of the world, now fluctuate under

the violence and oppression of Odoacer the mercenary.  Direct me,

with my national troops, to march against the tyrant.  If I fall,

you will be relieved from an expensive and troublesome friend:

if, with the divine permission, I succeed, I shall govern in your

name, and to your glory, the Roman senate, and the part of the

republic delivered from slavery by my victorious arms." The

proposal of Theodoric was accepted, and perhaps had been

suggested, by the Byzantine court.  But the forms of the

commission, or grant, appear to have been expressed with a

prudent ambiguity, which might be explained by the event; and it

was left doubtful, whether the conqueror of Italy should reign as

the lieutenant, the vassal, or the ally, of the emperor of the

East. ^16

[Footnote 13: As he was riding in his own camp, an unruly horse

threw him against the point of a spear which hung before a tent,

or was fixed on a wagon, (Marcellin. in Chron. Evagrius, l. iii.

c. 25.)]

[Footnote 14: See Malchus (p. 91) and Evagrius, (l. iii. c. 35.)]

[Footnote 15: Malchus, p. 85.  In a single action, which was

decided by the skill and discipline of Sabinian, Theodoric could

lose 5000 men.]

[Footnote 16: Jornandes (c. 57, p. 696, 697) has abridged the

great history of Cassiodorus.  See, compare, and reconcile

Procopius, (Gothic. l. i. c. i.,) the Valesian Fragment, (p.

718,) Theophanes, (p. 113,) and Marcellinus, (in Chron.)]

     The reputation both of the leader and of the war diffused a

universal ardor; the Walamirs were multiplied by the Gothic

swarms already engaged in the service, or seated in the

provinces, of the empire; and each bold Barbarian, who had heard

of the wealth and beauty of Italy, was impatient to seek, through

the most perilous adventures, the possession of such enchanting

objects.  The march of Theodoric must be considered as the

emigration of an entire people; the wives and children of the

Goths, their aged parents, and most precious effects, were

carefully transported; and some idea may be formed of the heavy

baggage that now followed the camp, by the loss of two thousand

wagons, which had been sustained in a single action in the war of

Epirus.  For their subsistence, the Goths depended on the

magazines of corn which was ground in portable mills by the hands

of their women; on the milk and flesh of their flocks and herds;

on the casual produce of the chase, and upon the contributions

which they might impose on all who should presume to dispute the

passage, or to refuse their friendly assistance.  Notwithstanding

these precautions, they were exposed to the danger, and almost to

the distress, of famine, in a march of seven hundred miles, which

had been undertaken in the depth of a rigorous winter.  Since the

fall of the Roman power, Dacia and Pannonia no longer exhibited

the rich prospect of populous cities, well-cultivated fields, and

convenient highways: the reign of barbarism and desolation was

restored, and the tribes of Bulgarians, Gepidae, and Sarmatians,

who had occupied the vacant province, were prompted by their

native fierceness, or the solicitations of Odoacer, to resist the

progress of his enemy.  In many obscure though bloody battles,

Theodoric fought and vanquished; till at length, surmounting

every obstacle by skilful conduct and persevering courage, he

descended from the Julian Alps, and displayed his invincible

banners on the confines of Italy. ^17

[Footnote 17: Theodoric's march is supplied and illustrated by

Ennodius, (p. 1598 - 1602,) when the bombast of the oration is

translated into the language of common sense.]

     Odoacer, a rival not unworthy of his arms, had already

occupied the advantageous and well-known post of the River

Sontius, near the ruins of Aquileia, at the head of a powerful

host, whose independent kings ^18 or leaders disdained the duties

of subordination and the prudence of delays.  No sooner had

Theodoric gained a short repose and refreshment to his wearied

cavalry, than he boldly attacked the fortifications of the enemy;

the Ostrogoths showed more ardor to acquire, than the mercenaries

to defend, the lands of Italy; and the reward of the first

victory was the possession of the Venetian province as far as the

walls of Verona. In the neighborhood of that city, on the steep

banks of the rapid Adige, he was opposed by a new army,

reenforced in its numbers, and not impaired in its courage: the

contest was more obstinate, but the event was still more

decisive; Odoacer fled to Ravenna, Theodoric advanced to Milan,

and the vanquished troops saluted their conqueror with loud

acclamations of respect and fidelity.  But their want either of

constancy or of faith soon exposed him to the most imminent

danger; his vanguard, with several Gothic counts, which had been

rashly intrusted to a deserter, was betrayed and destroyed near

Faenza by his double treachery; Odoacer again appeared master of

the field, and the invader, strongly intrenched in his camp of

Pavia, was reduced to solicit the aid of a kindred nation, the

Visigoths of Gaul.  In the course of this History, the most

voracious appetite for war will be abundantly satiated; nor can I

much lament that our dark and imperfect materials do not afford a

more ample narrative of the distress of Italy, and of the fierce

conflict, which was finally decided by the abilities, experience,

and valor of the Gothic king.  Immediately before the battle of

Verona, he visited the tent of his mother ^19 and sister, and

requested, that on a day, the most illustrious festival of his

life, they would adorn him with the rich garments which they had

worked with their own hands.  "Our glory," said he, "is mutual

and inseparable.  You are known to the world as the mother of

Theodoric; and it becomes me to prove, that I am the genuine

offspring of those heroes from whom I claim my descent." The wife

or concubine of Theodemir was inspired with the spirit of the

German matrons, who esteemed their sons' honor far above their

safety; and it is reported, that in a desperate action, when

Theodoric himself was hurried along by the torrent of a flying

crowd, she boldly met them at the entrance of the camp, and, by

her generous reproaches, drove them back on the swords of the

enemy. ^20

[Footnote 18: Tot reges, &c., (Ennodius, p. 1602.) We must

recollect how much the royal title was multiplied and degraded,

and that the mercenaries of Italy were the fragments of many

tribes and nations.]

[Footnote 19: See Ennodius, p. 1603, 1604.  Since the orator, in

the king's presence, could mention and praise his mother, we may

conclude that the magnanimity of Theodoric was not hurt by the

vulgar reproaches of concubine and bastard.

     Note: Gibbon here assumes that the mother of Theodoric was

the concubine of Theodemir, which he leaves doubtful in the text.

- M.]

[Footnote 20: This anecdote is related on the modern but

respectable authority of Sigonius, (Op. tom. i. p. 580.  De

Occident. Impl. l. xv.:) his words are curious: "Would you

return?" &c.  She presented and almost displayed the original

recess.

     Note: The authority of Sigonius would scarcely have weighed

with Gibboa except for an indecent anecdote.  I have a

recollection of a similar story in some of the Italian wars. -

M.]]

     From the Alps to the extremity of Calabria, Theodoric

reigned by the right of conquest; the Vandal ambassadors

surrendered the Island of Sicily, as a lawful appendage of his

kingdom; and he was accepted as the deliverer of Rome by the

senate and people, who had shut their gates against the flying

usurper. ^21 Ravenna alone, secure in the fortifications of art

and nature, still sustained a siege of almost three years; and

the daring sallies of Odoacer carried slaughter and dismay into

the Gothic camp.  At length, destitute of provisions and hopeless

of relief, that unfortunate monarch yielded to the groans of his

subjects and the clamors of his soldiers.  A treaty of peace was

negotiated by the bishop of Ravenna; the Ostrogoths were admitted

into the city, and the hostile kings consented, under the

sanction of an oath, to rule with equal and undivided authority

the provinces of Italy. The event of such an agreement may be

easily foreseen.  After some days had been devoted to the

semblance of joy and friendship, Odoacer, in the midst of a

solemn banquet, was stabbed by the hand, or at least by the

command, of his rival.  Secret and effectual orders had been

previously despatched; the faithless and rapacious mercenaries,

at the same moment, and without resistance, were universally

massacred; and the royalty of Theodoric was proclaimed by the

Goths, with the tardy, reluctant, ambiguous consent of the

emperor of the East.  The design of a conspiracy was imputed,

according to the usual forms, to the prostrate tyrant; but his

innocence, and the guilt of his conqueror, ^22 are sufficiently

proved by the advantageous treaty which force would not sincerely

have granted, nor weakness have rashly infringed.  The jealousy

of power, and the mischiefs of discord, may suggest a more decent

apology, and a sentence less rigorous may be pronounced against a

crime which was necessary to introduce into Italy a generation of

public felicity.  The living author of this felicity was

audaciously praised in his own presence by sacred and profane

orators; ^23 but history (in his time she was mute and

inglorious) has not left any just representation of the events

which displayed, or of the defects which clouded, the virtues of

Theodoric. ^24 One record of his fame, the volume of public

epistles composed by Cassiodorus in the royal name, is still

extant, and has obtained more implicit credit than it seems to

deserve. ^25 They exhibit the forms, rather than the substance,

of his government; and we should vainly search for the pure and

spontaneous sentiments of the Barbarian amidst the declamation

and learning of a sophist, the wishes of a Roman senator, the

precedents of office, and the vague professions, which, in every

court, and on every occasion, compose the language of discreet

ministers.  The reputation of Theodoric may repose with more

confidence on the visible peace and prosperity of a reign of

thirty-three years; the unanimous esteem of his own times, and

the memory of his wisdom and courage, his justice and humanity,

which was deeply impressed on the minds of the Goths and

Italians.

[Footnote 21: Hist. Miscell. l. xv., a Roman history from Janus

to the ixth century, an Epitome of Eutropius, Paulus Diaconus,

and Theophanes which Muratori has published from a Ms. in the

Ambrosian library, (Script. Rerum Italicarum, tom. i. p. 100.)]

[Footnote 22: Procopius (Gothic. l. i. c. i.) approves himself an

impartial sceptic. Cassiodorus (in Chron.) and Ennodius (p. 1604)

are loyal and credulous, and the testimony of the Valesian

Fragment (p. 718) may justify their belief.  Marcellinus spits

the venom of a Greek subject - perjuriis illectus, interfectusque

est, (in Chron.)]

[Footnote 23: The sonorous and servile oration of Ennodius was

pronounced at Milan or Ravenna in the years 507 or 508, (Sirmond,

tom. i. p. 615.) Two or three years afterwards, the orator was

rewarded with the bishopric of Pavia, which he held till his

death in the year 521.  (Dupin, Bibliot. Eccles. tom. v. p. 11 -

14.  See Saxii Onomasticon, tom. ii. p. 12.)]

[Footnote 24: Our best materials are occasional hints from

Procopius and the Valesian Fragment, which was discovered by

Sirmond, and is published at the end of Ammianus Marcellinus.

The author's name is unknown, and his style is barbarous; but in

his various facts he exhibits the knowledge, without the

passions, of a contemporary.  The president Montesquieu had

formed the plan of a history of Theodoric, which at a distance

might appear a rich and interesting subject.]

[Footnote 25: The best edition of the Variarum Libri xii. is that

of Joh. Garretius, (Rotomagi, 1679, in Opp. Cassiodor. 2 vols. in

fol.;) but they deserved and required such an editor as the

Marquis Scipio Maffei, who thought of publishing them at Verona.

The Barbara Eleganza (as it is ingeniously named by Tiraboschi)

is never simple, and seldom perspicuous]

     The partition of the lands of Italy, of which Theodoric

assigned the third part to his soldiers, is honorably arraigned

as the sole injustice of his life. ^* And even this act may be

fairly justified by the example of Odoacer, the rights of

conquest, the true interest of the Italians, and the sacred duty

of subsisting a whole people, who, on the faith of his promises,

had transported themselves into a distant land. ^26 Under the

reign of Theodoric, and in the happy climate of Italy, the Goths

soon multiplied to a formidable host of two hundred thousand men,

^27 and the whole amount of their families may be computed by the

ordinary addition of women and children. Their invasion of

property, a part of which must have been already vacant, was

disguised by the generous but improper name of hospitality; these

unwelcome guests were irregularly dispersed over the face of

Italy, and the lot of each Barbarian was adequate to his birth

and office, the number of his followers, and the rustic wealth

which he possessed in slaves and cattle. The distinction of noble

and plebeian were acknowledged; ^28 but the lands of every

freeman were exempt from taxes, ^* and he enjoyed the inestimable

privilege of being subject only to the laws of his country. ^29

Fashion, and even convenience, soon persuaded the conquerors to

assume the more elegant dress of the natives, but they still

persisted in the use of their mother- tongue; and their contempt

for the Latin schools was applauded by Theodoric himself, who

gratified their prejudices, or his own, by declaring, that the

child who had trembled at a rod, would never dare to look upon a

sword. ^30 Distress might sometimes provoke the indigent Roman to

assume the ferocious manners which were insensibly relinquished

by the rich and luxurious Barbarian; ^31 but these mutual

conversions were not encouraged by the policy of a monarch who

perpetuated the separation of the Italians and Goths; reserving

the former for the arts of peace, and the latter for the service

of war.  To accomplish this design, he studied to protect his

industrious subjects, and to moderate the violence, without

enervating the valor, of his soldiers, who were maintained for

the public defence.  They held their lands and benefices as a

military stipend: at the sound of the trumpet, they were prepared

to march under the conduct of their provincial officers; and the

whole extent of Italy was distributed into the several quarters

of a well- regulated camp.  The service of the palace and of the

frontiers was performed by choice or by rotation; and each

extraordinary fatigue was recompensed by an increase of pay and

occasional donatives.  Theodoric had convinced his brave

companions, that empire must be acquired and defended by the same

arts. After his example, they strove to excel in the use, not

only of the lance and sword, the instruments of their victories,

but of the missile weapons, which they were too much inclined to

neglect; and the lively image of war was displayed in the daily

exercise and annual reviews of the Gothic cavalry.  A firm though

gentle discipline imposed the habits of modesty, obedience, and

temperance; and the Goths were instructed to spare the people, to

reverence the laws, to understand the duties of civil society,

and to disclaim the barbarous license of judicial combat and

private revenge. ^32

[Footnote *: Compare Gibbon, ch. xxxvi. vol. iii. p. 459, &c. -

Manso observes that this division was conducted not in a violent

and irregular, but in a legal and orderly, manner.  The

Barbarian, who could not show a title of grant from the officers

of Theodoric appointed for the purpose, or a prescriptive right

of thirty years, in case he had obtained the property before the

Ostrogothic conquest, was ejected from the estate.  He conceives

that estates too small to bear division paid a third of their

produce. - Geschichte des Os Gothischen Reiches, p. 82. - M.]

[Footnote 26: Procopius, Gothic, l. i. c. i. Variarum, ii. Maffei

(Verona Illustrata, P. i. p. 228) exaggerates the injustice of

the Goths, whom he hated as an Italian noble.  The plebeian

Muratori crouches under their oppression.]

[Footnote 27: Procopius, Goth. l. iii. c. 421.  Ennodius

describes (p. 1612, 1613) the military arts and increasing

numbers of the Goths.]

[Footnote 28: When Theodoric gave his sister to the king of the

Vandals she sailed for Africa with a guard of 1000 noble Goths,

each of whom was attended by five armed followers, (Procop.

Vandal. l. i. c. 8.) The Gothic nobility must have been as

numerous as brave.]

[Footnote *: Manso (p. 100) quotes two passages from Cassiodorus

to show that the Goths were not exempt from the fiscal claims. -

Cassiodor, i. 19, iv. 14 - M.]

[Footnote 29: See the acknowledgment of Gothic liberty, (Var. v.

30.)]

[Footnote 30: Procopius, Goth. l. i. c. 2.  The Roman boys learnt

the language (Var. viii. 21) of the Goths.  Their general

ignorance is not destroyed by the exceptions of Amalasuntha, a

female, who might study without shame, or of Theodatus, whose

learning provoked the indignation and contempt of his

countrymen.]

[Footnote 31: A saying of Theodoric was founded on experience:

"Romanus miser imitatur Gothum; ut utilis (dives) Gothus imitatur

Romanum." (See the Fragment and Notes of Valesius, p. 719.)]

[Footnote 32: The view of the military establishment of the Goths

in Italy is collected from the Epistles of Cassiodorus (Var. i.

24, 40; iii. 3, 24, 48; iv. 13, 14; v. 26, 27; viii. 3, 4, 25.)

They are illustrated by the learned Mascou, (Hist. of the

Germans, l. xi. 40 - 44, Annotation xiv.)

     Note: Compare Manso, Geschichte des Ost Gothischen Reiches,

p. 114. - M.]

Chapter XXXIX: Gothic Kingdom Of Italy.

Part II.

     Among the Barbarians of the West, the victory of Theodoric

had spread a general alarm.  But as soon as it appeared that he

was satisfied with conquest and desirous of peace, terror was

changed into respect, and they submitted to a powerful mediation,

which was uniformly employed for the best purposes of reconciling

their quarrels and civilizing their manners. ^33 The ambassadors

who resorted to Ravenna from the most distant countries of

Europe, admired his wisdom, magnificence, ^34 and courtesy; and

if he sometimes accepted either slaves or arms, white horses or

strange animals, the gift of a sun-dial, a water-clock, or a

musician, admonished even the princes of Gaul of the superior art

and industry of his Italian subjects. His domestic alliances, ^35

a wife, two daughters, a sister, and a niece, united the family

of Theodoric with the kings of the Franks, the Burgundians, the

Visigoths, the Vandals, and the Thuringians, and contributed to

maintain the harmony, or at least the balance, of the great

republic of the West. ^36 It is difficult in the dark forests of

Germany and Poland to pursue the emigrations of the Heruli, a

fierce people who disdained the use of armor, and who condemned

their widows and aged parents not to survive the loss of their

husbands, or the decay of their strength. ^37 The king of these

savage warriors solicited the friendship of Theodoric, and was

elevated to the rank of his son, according to the barbaric rites

of a military adoption. ^38 From the shores of the Baltic, the

Aestians or Livonians laid their offerings of native amber ^39 at

the feet of a prince, whose fame had excited them to undertake an

unknown and dangerous journey of fifteen hundred miles.  With the

country ^40 from whence the Gothic nation derived their origin,

he maintained a frequent and friendly correspondence: the

Italians were clothed in the rich sables ^41 of Sweden; and one

of its sovereigns, after a voluntary or reluctant abdication,

found a hospitable retreat in the palace of Ravenna.  He had

reigned over one of the thirteen populous tribes who cultivated a

small portion of the great island or peninsula of Scandinavia, to

which the vague appellation of Thule has been sometimes applied.

That northern region was peopled, or had been explored, as high

as the sixty- eighth degree of latitude, where the natives of the

polar circle enjoy and lose the presence of the sun at each

summer and winter solstice during an equal period of forty days.

^42 The long night of his absence or death was the mournful

season of distress and anxiety, till the messengers, who had been

sent to the mountain tops, descried the first rays of returning

light, and proclaimed to the plain below the festival of his

resurrection. ^43

[Footnote 33: See the clearness and vigor of his negotiations in

Ennodius, (p. 1607,) and Cassiodorus, (Var. iii. 1, 2, 3, 4; iv.

13; v. 43, 44,) who gives the different styles of friendship,

counsel expostulation, &c.]

[Footnote 34: Even of his table (Var. vi. 9) and palace, (vii.

5.) The admiration of strangers is represented as the most

rational motive to justify these vain expenses, and to stimulate

the diligence of the officers to whom these provinces were

intrusted.]

[Footnote 35: See the public and private alliances of the Gothic

monarch, with the Burgundians, (Var. i. 45, 46,) with the Franks,

(ii. 40,) with the Thuringians, (iv. 1,) and with the Vandals,

(v. 1;) each of these epistles affords some curious knowledge of

the policy and manners of the Barbarians.]

[Footnote 36: His political system may be observed in

Cassiodorus, (Var. iv. l ix. l,) Jornandes, (c. 58, p. 698, 699,)

and the Valesian Fragment, (p. 720, 721.) Peace, honorable peace,

was the constant aim of Theodoric.]

[Footnote 37: The curious reader may contemplate the Heruli of

Procopius, (Goth. l. ii. c. 14,) and the patient reader may

plunge into the dark and minute researches of M. de Buat, (Hist.

des Peuples Anciens, tom. ix. p. 348 - 396.)

     Note: Compare Manso, Ost Gothische Reich. Beylage, vi.

Malte- Brun brings them from Scandinavia: their names, the only

remains of their language, are Gothic.  "They fought almost

naked, like the Icelandic Berserkirs their bravery was like

madness: few in number, they were mostly of royal blood. What

ferocity, what unrestrained license, sullied their victories!

The Goth respects the church, the priests, the senate; the Heruli

mangle all in a general massacre: there is no pity for age, no

refuge for chastity.  Among themselves there is the same

ferocity: the sick and the aged are put to death. at their own

request, during a solemn festival; the widow ends her days by

hanging herself upon the tree which shadows her husband's tomb.

All these circumstances, so striking to a mind familiar with

Scandinavian history, lead us to discover among the Heruli not so

much a nation as a confederacy of princes and nobles, bound by an

oath to live and die together with their arms in their hands.

Their name, sometimes written Heruli or Eruli. sometimes Aeruli,

signified, according to an ancient author, (Isid. Hispal. in

gloss. p. 24, ad calc. Lex. Philolog. Martini, ll,) nobles, and

appears to correspond better with the Scandinavian word iarl or

earl, than with any of those numerous derivations proposed by

etymologists." Malte- Brun, vol. i. p. 400, (edit. 1831.) Of all

the Barbarians who threw themselves on the ruins of the Roman

empire, it is most difficult to trace the origin of the Heruli.

They seem never to have been very powerful as a nation, and

branches of them are found in countries very remote from each

other.  In my opinion they belong to the Gothic race, and have a

close affinity with the Scyrri or Hirri.  They were, possibly, a

division of that nation.  They are often mingled and confounded

with the Alani.  Though brave and formidable. they were never

numerous. nor did they found any state. - St. Martin, vol. vi. p.

375. - M. Schafarck considers them descendants of the Hirri. of

which Heruli is a diminutive, - Slawische Alter thinner - M.

1845.]

[Footnote 38: Variarum, iv. 2.  The spirit and forms of this

martial institution are noticed by Cassiodorus; but he seems to

have only translated the sentiments of the Gothic king into the

language of Roman eloquence.]

[Footnote 39: Cassiodorus, who quotes Tacitus to the Aestians,

the unlettered savages of the Baltic, (Var. v. 2,) describes the

amber for which their shores have ever been famous, as the gum of

a tree, hardened by the sun, and purified and wafted by the

waves.  When that singular substance is analyzed by the chemists,

it yields a vegetable oil and a mineral acid.]

[Footnote 40: Scanzia, or Thule, is described by Jornandes (c. 3,

p. 610 - 613) and Procopius, (Goth. l. ii. c. 15.) Neither the

Goth nor the Greek had visited the country: both had conversed

with the natives in their exile at Ravenna or Constantinople.]

[Footnote 41: Sapherinas pelles.  In the time of Jornandes they

inhabited Suethans, the proper Sweden; but that beautiful race of

animals has gradually been driven into the eastern parts of

Siberia.  See Buffon, (Hist. Nat. tom. xiii. p. 309 - 313, quarto

edition;) Pennant, (System of Quadrupeds, vol. i. p. 322 - 328;)

Gmelin, (Hist. Gen des. Voyages, tom. xviii. p. 257, 258;) and

Levesque, (Hist. de Russie, tom. v. p. 165, 166, 514, 515.)]

[Footnote 42: In the system or romance of Mr. Bailly, (Lettres

sur les Sciences et sur l'Atlantide, tom. i. p. 249 - 256, tom.

ii. p. 114 - 139,) the phoenix of the Edda, and the annual death

and revival of Adonis and Osiris, are the allegorical symbols of

the absence and return of the sun in the Arctic regions.  This

ingenious writer is a worthy disciple of the great Buffon; nor is

it easy for the coldest reason to withstand the magic of their

philosophy.]

[Footnote 43: Says Procopius.  At present a rude Manicheism

(generous enough) prevails among the Samoyedes in Greenland and

in Lapland, (Hist. des Voyages, tom. xviii. p. 508, 509, tom.

xix. p. 105, 106, 527, 528;) yet, according to Orotius Samojutae

coelum atque astra adorant, numina haud aliis iniquiora, (de

Rebus Belgicis, l. iv. p. 338, folio edition) a sentence which

Tacitus would not have disowned.]

     The life of Theodoric represents the rare and meritorious

example of a Barbarian, who sheathed his sword in the pride of

victory and the vigor of his age.  A reign of three and thirty

years was consecrated to the duties of civil government, and the

hostilities, in which he was sometimes involved, were speedily

terminated by the conduct of his lieutenants, the discipline of

his troops, the arms of his allies, and even by the terror of his

name.  He reduced, under a strong and regular government, the

unprofitable countries of Rhaetia, Noricum, Dalmatia, and

Pannonia, from the source of the Danube and the territory of the

Bavarians, ^44 to the petty kingdom erected by the Gepidae on the

ruins of Sirmium.  His prudence could not safely intrust the

bulwark of Italy to such feeble and turbulent neighbors; and his

justice might claim the lands which they oppressed, either as a

part of his kingdom, or as the inheritance of his father.  The

greatness of a servant, who was named perfidious because he was

successful, awakened the jealousy of the emperor Anastasius; and

a war was kindled on the Dacian frontier, by the protection which

the Gothic king, in the vicissitude of human affairs, had granted

to one of the descendants of Attila.  Sabinian, a general

illustrious by his own and father's merit, advanced at the head

of ten thousand Romans; and the provisions and arms, which filled

a long train of wagons, were distributed to the fiercest of the

Bulgarian tribes.  But in the fields of Margus, the eastern

powers were defeated by the inferior forces of the Goths and

Huns; the flower and even the hope of the Roman armies was

irretrievably destroyed; and such was the temperance with which

Theodoric had inspired his victorious troops, that, as their

leader had not given the signal of pillage, the rich spoils of

the enemy lay untouched at their feet. ^45 Exasperated by this

disgrace, the Byzantine court despatched two hundred ships and

eight thousand men to plunder the sea-coast of Calabria and

Apulia: they assaulted the ancient city of Tarentum, interrupted

the trade and agriculture of a happy country, and sailed back to

the Hellespont, proud of their piratical victory over a people

whom they still presumed to consider as their Roman brethren. ^46

Their retreat was possibly hastened by the activity of Theodoric;

Italy was covered by a fleet of a thousand light vessels, ^47

which he constructed with incredible despatch; and his firm

moderation was soon rewarded by a solid and honorable peace.  He

maintained, with a powerful hand, the balance of the West, till

it was at length overthrown by the ambition of Clovis; and

although unable to assist his rash and unfortunate kinsman, the

king of the Visigoths, he saved the remains of his family and

people, and checked the Franks in the midst of their victorious

career.  I am not desirous to prolong or repeat ^48 this

narrative of military events, the least interesting of the reign

of Theodoric; and shall be content to add, that the Alemanni were

protected, ^49 that an inroad of the Burgundians was severely

chastised, and that the conquest of Arles and Marseilles opened a

free communication with the Visigoths, who revered him as their

national protector, and as the guardian of his grandchild, the

infant son of Alaric. Under this respectable character, the king

of Italy restored the praetorian praefecture of the Gauls,

reformed some abuses in the civil government of Spain, and

accepted the annual tribute and apparent submission of its

military governor, who wisely refused to trust his person in the

palace of Ravenna. ^50 The Gothic sovereignty was established

from Sicily to the Danube, from Sirmium or Belgrade to the

Atlantic Ocean; and the Greeks themselves have acknowledged that

Theodoric reigned over the fairest portion of the Western empire.

^51

[Footnote 44: See the Hist. des Peuples Anciens, &c., tom. ix. p.

255 - 273, 396 - 501.  The count de Buat was French minister at

the court of Bavaria: a liberal curiosity prompted his inquiries

into the antiquities of the country, and that curiosity was the

germ of twelve respectable volumes.]

[Footnote 45: See the Gothic transactions on the Danube and the

Illyricum, in Jornandes, (c. 58, p. 699;) Ennodius, (p. 1607 -

1610;) Marcellmus (in Chron. p. 44, 47, 48;) and Cassiodorus, in

(in Chron and Var. iii. 29 50, iv. 13, vii. 4 24, viii. 9, 10,

11, 21, ix. 8, 9.)]

[Footnote 46: I cannot forbear transcribing the liberal and

classic style of Count Marcellinus: Romanus comes domesticorum,

et Rusticus comes scholariorum cum centum armatis navibus,

totidemque dromonibus, octo millia militum armatorum secum

ferentibus, ad devastanda Italiae littora processerunt, ut usque

ad Tarentum antiquissimam civitatem aggressi sunt; remensoque

mari in honestam victoriam quam piratico ausu Romani ex Romanis

rapuerunt, Anastasio Caesari reportarunt, (in Chron. p. 48.) See

Variar. i. 16, ii. 38.]

[Footnote 47: See the royal orders and instructions, (Var. iv.

15, v. 16 - 20.) These armed boats should be still smaller than

the thousand vessels of Agamemnon at the siege of Troy.  (Manso,

p. 121.)]

[Footnote 48: Vol. iii. p. 581 - 585.]

[Footnote 49: Ennodius (p. 1610) and Cassiodorus, in the royal

name, (Var. ii 41,) record his salutary protection of the

Alemanni.]

[Footnote 50: The Gothic transactions in Gaul and Spain are

represented with some perplexity in Cassiodorus, (Var. iii. 32,

38, 41, 43, 44, v. 39.) Jornandes, (c. 58, p. 698, 699,) and

Procopius, (Goth. l. i. c. 12.) I will neither hear nor reconcile

the long and contradictory arguments of the Abbe Dubos and the

Count de Buat, about the wars of Burgundy.]

[Footnote 51: Theophanes, p. 113.]

     The union of the Goths and Romans might have fixed for ages

the transient happiness of Italy; and the first of nations, a new

people of free subjects and enlightened soldiers, might have

gradually arisen from the mutual emulation of their respective

virtues.  But the sublime merit of guiding or seconding such a

revolution was not reserved for the reign of Theodoric: he wanted

either the genius or the opportunities of a legislator; ^52 and

while he indulged the Goths in the enjoyment of rude liberty, he

servilely copied the institutions, and even the abuses, of the

political system which had been framed by Constantine and his

successors.  From a tender regard to the expiring prejudices of

Rome, the Barbarian declined the name, the purple, and the

diadem, of the emperors; but he assumed, under the hereditary

title of king, the whole substance and plenitude of Imperial

prerogative. ^53 His addresses to the eastern throne were

respectful and ambiguous: he celebrated, in pompous style, the

harmony of the two republics, applauded his own government as the

perfect similitude of a sole and undivided empire, and claimed

above the kings of the earth the same preeminence which he

modestly allowed to the person or rank of Anastasius. The

alliance of the East and West was annually declared by the

unanimous choice of two consuls; but it should seem that the

Italian candidate who was named by Theodoric accepted a formal

confirmation from the sovereign of Constantinople. ^54 The Gothic

palace of Ravenna reflected the image of the court of Theodosius

or Valentinian.  The Praetorian praefect, the praefect of Rome,

the quaestor, the master of the offices, with the public and

patrimonial treasurers, ^* whose functions are painted in gaudy

colors by the rhetoric of Cassiodorus, still continued to act as

the ministers of state. And the subordinate care of justice and

the revenue was delegated to seven consulars, three correctors,

and five presidents, who governed the fifteen regions of Italy

according to the principles, and even the forms, of Roman

jurisprudence. ^55 The violence of the conquerors was abated or

eluded by the slow artifice of judicial proceedings; the civil

administration, with its honors and emoluments, was confined to

the Italians; and the people still preserved their dress and

language, their laws and customs, their personal freedom, and two

thirds of their landed property. ^! It had been the object of

Augustus to conceal the introduction of monarchy; it was the

policy of Theodoric to disguise the reign of a Barbarian. ^56 If

his subjects were sometimes awakened from this pleasing vision of

a Roman government, they derived more substantial comfort from

the character of a Gothic prince, who had penetration to discern,

and firmness to pursue, his own and the public interest.

Theodoric loved the virtues which he possessed, and the talents

of which he was destitute.  Liberius was promoted to the office

of Praetorian praefect for his unshaken fidelity to the

unfortunate cause of Odoacer.  The ministers of Theodoric,

Cassiodorus, ^57 and Boethius, have reflected on his reign the

lustre of their genius and learning.  More prudent or more

fortunate than his colleague, Cassiodorus preserved his own

esteem without forfeiting the royal favor; and after passing

thirty years in the honors of the world, he was blessed with an

equal term of repose in the devout and studious solitude of

Squillace. ^*

[Footnote 52: Procopius affirms that no laws whatsoever were

promulgated by Theodoric and the succeeding kings of Italy,

(Goth. l. ii. c. 6.) He must mean in the Gothic language.  A

Latin edict of Theodoric is still extant, in one hundred and

fifty-four articles.

     Note: See Manso, 92. Savigny, vol. ii. p. 164, et seq. - M.]

[Footnote 53: The image of Theodoric is engraved on his coins:

his modest successors were satisfied with adding their own name

to the head of the reigning emperor, (Muratori, Antiquitat.

Italiae Medii Aevi, tom. ii. dissert. xxvii. p. 577 - 579.

Giannone, Istoria Civile di Napoli tom. i. p. 166.)]

[Footnote 54: The alliance of the emperor and the king of Italy

are represented by Cassiodorus (Var. i. l, ii. 1, 2, 3, vi. l)

and Procopius, (Goth. l. ii. c. 6, l. iii. c. 21,) who celebrate

the friendship of Anastasius and Theodoric; but the figurative

style of compliment was interpreted in a very different sense at

Constantinople and Ravenna.]

[Footnote *: All causes between Roman and Roman were judged by

the old Roman courts.  The comes Gothorum judged between Goth and

Goth; between Goths and Romans, (without considering which was

the plaintiff.) the comes Gothorum, with a Roman jurist as his

assessor, making a kind of mixed jurisdiction, but with a natural

predominance to the side of the Goth Savigny, vol. i. p. 290. -

M.]

[Footnote 55: To the xvii. provinces of the Notitia, Paul

Warnefrid the deacon (De Reb. Longobard. l. ii. c. 14 - 22) has

subjoined an xviiith, the Apennine, (Muratori, Script. Rerum

Italicarum, tom. i. p. 431 - 443.) But of these Sardinia and

Corsica were possessed by the Vandals, and the two Rhaetias, as

well as the Cottian Alps, seem to have been abandoned to a

military government.  The state of the four provinces that now

form the kingdom of Naples is labored by Giannone (tom. i. p.

172, 178) with patriotic diligence.]

[Footnote !: Manso enumerates and develops at some length the

following sources of the royal revenue of Theodoric: 1. A domain,

either by succession to that of Odoacer, or a part of the third

of the lands was reserved for the royal patrimony.  1. Regalia,

including mines, unclaimed estates, treasure-trove, and

confiscations.  3. Land tax.  4. Aurarium, like the Chrysargyrum,

a tax on certain branches of trade.  5. Grant of Monopolies.  6.

Siliquaticum, a small tax on the sale of all kinds of

commodities.  7. Portoria, customs Manso, 96, 111.  Savigny (i.

285) supposes that in many cases the property remained in the

original owner, who paid his tertia, a third of the produce to

the crown, vol. i. p. 285. - M.]

[Footnote 56: See the Gothic history of Procopius, (l. i. c. 1,

l. ii. c. 6,) the Epistles of Cassiodorus, (passim, but

especially the vth and vith books, which contain the formulae, or

patents of offices,) and the Civil History of Giannone, (tom. i.

l. ii. iii.) The Gothic counts, which he places in every Italian

city, are annihilated, however, by Maffei, (Verona Illustrata, P.

i. l. viii. p. 227; for those of Syracuse and Naples (Var vi. 22,

23) were special and temporary commissions.]

[Footnote 57: Two Italians of the name of Cassiodorus, the father

(Var. i. 24, 40) and the son, (ix. 24, 25,) were successively

employed in the administration of Theodoric.  The son was born in

the year 479: his various epistles as quaestor, master of the

offices, and Praetorian praefect, extend from 509 to 539, and he

lived as a monk about thirty years, (Tiraboschi Storia della

Letteratura Italiana, tom. iii. p. 7 - 24.  Fabricius, Bibliot.

Lat. Med. Aevi, tom. i. p. 357, 358, edit. Mansi.)]

[Footnote *: Cassiodorus was of an ancient and honorable family;

his grandfather had distinguished himself in the defence of

Sicily against the ravages of Genseric; his father held a high

rank at the court of Valentinian III., enjoyed the friendship of

Aetius, and was one of the ambassadors sent to arrest the

progress of Attila.  Cassiodorus himself was first the treasurer

of the private expenditure to Odoacer, afterwards "count of the

sacred largesses." Yielding with the rest of the Romans to the

dominion of Theodoric, he was instrumental in the peaceable

submission of Sicily; was successively governor of his native

provinces of Bruttium and Lucania, quaestor, magister, palatii,

Praetorian praefect, patrician, consul, and private secretary,

and, in fact, first minister of the king.  He was five times

Praetorian praefect under different sovereigns, the last time in

the reign of Vitiges.  This is the theory of Manso, which is not

unencumbered with difficulties.  M. Buat had supposed that it was

the father of Cassiodorus who held the office first named.

Compare Manso, p. 85, &c., and Beylage, vii.  It certainly

appears improbable that Cassiodorus should have been count of the

sacred largesses at twenty years old. - M.]

     As the patron of the republic, it was the interest and duty

of the Gothic king to cultivate the affections of the senate ^58

and people.  The nobles of Rome were flattered by sonorous

epithets and formal professions of respect, which had been more

justly applied to the merit and authority of their ancestors.

The people enjoyed, without fear or danger, the three blessings

of a capital, order, plenty, and public amusements.  A visible

diminution of their numbers may be found even in the measure of

liberality; ^59 yet Apulia, Calabria, and Sicily, poured their

tribute of corn into the granaries of Rome an allowance of bread

and meat was distributed to the indigent citizens; and every

office was deemed honorable which was consecrated to the care of

their health and happiness.  The public games, such as the Greek

ambassador might politely applaud, exhibited a faint and feeble

copy of the magnificence of the Caesars: yet the musical, the

gymnastic, and the pantomime arts, had not totally sunk in

oblivion; the wild beasts of Africa still exercised in the

amphitheatre the courage and dexterity of the hunters; and the

indulgent Goth either patiently tolerated or gently restrained

the blue and green factions, whose contests so often filled the

circus with clamor and even with blood. ^60 In the seventh year

of his peaceful reign, Theodoric visited the old capital of the

world; the senate and people advanced in solemn procession to

salute a second Trajan, a new Valentinian; and he nobly supported

that character by the assurance of a just and legal government,

^61 in a discourse which he was not afraid to pronounce in

public, and to inscribe on a tablet of brass.  Rome, in this

august ceremony, shot a last ray of declining glory; and a saint,

the spectator of this pompous scene, could only hope, in his

pious fancy, that it was excelled by the celestial splendor of

the new Jerusalem. ^62 During a residence of six months, the

fame, the person, and the courteous demeanor of the Gothic king,

excited the admiration of the Romans, and he contemplated, with

equal curiosity and surprise, the monuments that remained of

their ancient greatness.  He imprinted the footsteps of a

conqueror on the Capitoline hill, and frankly confessed that each

day he viewed with fresh wonder the forum of Trajan and his lofty

column.  The theatre of Pompey appeared, even in its decay, as a

huge mountain artificially hollowed, and polished, and adorned by

human industry; and he vaguely computed, that a river of gold

must have been drained to erect the colossal amphitheatre of

Titus. ^63 From the mouths of fourteen aqueducts, a pure and

copious stream was diffused into every part of the city; among

these the Claudian water, which arose at the distance of

thirty-eight miles in the Sabine mountains, was conveyed along a

gentle though constant declivity of solid arches, till it

descended on the summit of the Aventine hill.  The long and

spacious vaults which had been constructed for the purpose of

common sewers, subsisted, after twelve centuries, in their

pristine strength; and these subterraneous channels have been

preferred to all the visible wonders of Rome. ^64 The Gothic

kings, so injuriously accused of the ruin of antiquity, were

anxious to preserve the monuments of the nation whom they had

subdued. ^65 The royal edicts were framed to prevent the abuses,

the neglect, or the depredations of the citizens themselves; and

a professed architect, the annual sum of two hundred pounds of

gold, twenty-five thousand tiles, and the receipt of customs from

the Lucrine port, were assigned for the ordinary repairs of the

walls and public edifices. A similar care was extended to the

statues of metal or marble of men or animals.  The spirit of the

horses, which have given a modern name to the Quirinal, was

applauded by the Barbarians; ^66 the brazen elephants of the Via

sacra were diligently restored; ^67 the famous heifer of Myron

deceived the cattle, as they were driven through the forum of

peace; ^68 and an officer was created to protect those works of

rat, which Theodoric considered as the noblest ornament of his

kingdom.

[Footnote 58: See his regard for the senate in Cochlaeus, (Vit.

Theod. viii. p. 72 - 80.)]

[Footnote 59: No more than 120,000 modii, or four thousand

quarters, (Anonym. Valesian. p. 721, and Var. i. 35, vi. 18, xi.

5, 39.)]

[Footnote 60: See his regard and indulgence for the spectacles of

the circus, the amphitheatre, and the theatre, in the Chronicle

and Epistles of Cassiodorus, (Var. i. 20, 27, 30, 31, 32, iii.

51, iv. 51, illustrated by the xivth Annotation of Mascou's

History), who has contrived to sprinkle the subject with

ostentatious, though agreeable, learning.]

[Footnote 61: Anonym.  Vales. p. 721.  Marius Aventicensis in

Chron.  In the scale of public and personal merit, the Gothic

conqueror is at least as much above Valentinian, as he may seem

inferior to Trajan.]

[Footnote 62: Vit. Fulgentii in Baron. Annal. Eccles. A.D. 500,

No. 10.]

[Footnote 63: Cassiodorus describes in his pompous style the

Forum of Trajan (Var. vii. 6,) the theatre of Marcellus, (iv.

51,) and the amphitheatre of Titus, (v. 42;) and his descriptions

are not unworthy of the reader's perusal. According to the modern

prices, the Abbe Barthelemy computes that the brick work and

masonry of the Coliseum would now cost twenty millions of French

livres, (Mem. de l'Academie des Inscriptions, tom. xxviii. p.

585, 586.) How small a part of that stupendous fabric!]

[Footnote 64: For the aqueducts and cloacae, see Strabo, (l. v.

p. 360;) Pliny, (Hist. Natur. xxxvi. 24; Cassiodorus, (Var. iii.

30, 31, vi. 6;) Procopius, (Goth. l. i. c. 19;) and Nardini,

(Roma Antica, p. 514 - 522.) How such works could be executed by

a king of Rome, is yet a problem.

     Note: See Niebuhr, vol. i. p. 402.  These stupendous works

are among the most striking confirmations of Niebuhr's views of

the early Roman history; at least they appear to justify his

strong sentence - "These works and the building of the Capitol

attest with unquestionable evidence that this Rome of the later

kings was the chief city of a great state." - Page 110 - M.]

[Footnote 65: For the Gothic care of the buildings and statues,

see Cassiodorus (Var. i. 21, 25, ii. 34, iv. 30, vii. 6, 13, 15)

and the Valesian Fragment, (p. 721.)]

[Footnote 66: Var. vii. 15.  These horses of Monte Cavallo had

been transported from Alexandria to the baths of Constantine,

(Nardini, p. 188.) Their sculpture is disdained by the Abbe

Dubos, (Reflexions sur la Poesie et sur la Peinture, tom. i.

section 39,) and admired by Winkelman, (Hist. de l'Art, tom. ii.

p. 159.)]

[Footnote 67: Var. x. 10.  They were probably a fragment of some

triumphal car, (Cuper de Elephantis, ii. 10.)]

[Footnote 68: Procopius (Goth. l. iv. c. 21) relates a foolish

story of Myron's cow, which is celebrated by the false with of

thirty-six Greek epigrams, Antholog. l. iv. p. 302 - 306, edit.

Hen. Steph.; Auson.  Epigram. xiii. - lxviii.)]

Chapter XXXIX: Gothic Kingdom Of Italy.

Part III.

     After the example of the last emperors, Theodoric preferred

the residence of Ravenna, where he cultivated an orchard with his

own hands. ^69 As often as the peace of his kingdom was

threatened (for it was never invaded) by the Barbarians, he

removed his court to Verona ^70 on the northern frontier, and the

image of his palace, still extant on a coin, represents the

oldest and most authentic model of Gothic architecture.  These

two capitals, as well as Pavia, Spoleto, Naples, and the rest of

the Italian cities, acquired under his reign the useful or

splendid decorations of churches, aqueducts, baths, porticos, and

palaces. ^71 But the happiness of the subject was more truly

conspicuous in the busy scene of labor and luxury, in the rapid

increase and bold enjoyment of national wealth.  From the shades

of Tibur and Praeneste, the Roman senators still retired in the

winter season to the warm sun, and salubrious springs of Baiae;

and their villas, which advanced on solid moles into the Bay of

Naples, commanded the various prospect of the sky, the earth, and

the water.  On the eastern side of the Adriatic, a new Campania

was formed in the fair and fruitful province of Istria, which

communicated with the palace of Ravenna by an easy navigation of

one hundred miles.  The rich productions of Lucania and the

adjacent provinces were exchanged at the Marcilian fountain, in a

populous fair annually dedicated to trade, intemperance, and

superstition.  In the solitude of Comum, which had once been

animated by the mild genius of Pliny, a transparent basin above

sixty miles in length still reflected the rural seats which

encompassed the margin of the Larian lake; and the gradual ascent

of the hills was covered by a triple plantation of olives, of

vines, and of chestnut trees. ^72 Agriculture revived under the

shadow of peace, and the number of husbandmen was multiplied by

the redemption of captives. ^73 The iron mines of Dalmatia, a

gold mine in Bruttium, were carefully explored, and the Pomptine

marshes, as well as those of Spoleto, were drained and cultivated

by private undertakers, whose distant reward must depend on the

continuance of the public prosperity. ^74 Whenever the seasons

were less propitious, the doubtful precautions of forming

magazines of corn, fixing the price, and prohibiting the

exportation, attested at least the benevolence of the state; but

such was the extraordinary plenty which an industrious people

produced from a grateful soil, that a gallon of wine was

sometimes sold in Italy for less than three farthings, and a

quarter of wheat at about five shillings and sixpence. ^75 A

country possessed of so many valuable objects of exchange soon

attracted the merchants of the world, whose beneficial traffic

was encouraged and protected by the liberal spirit of Theodoric.

The free intercourse of the provinces by land and water was

restored and extended; the city gates were never shut either by

day or by night; and the common saying, that a purse of gold

might be safely left in the fields, was expressive of the

conscious security of the inhabitants.

[Footnote 69: See an epigram of Ennodius (ii. 3, p. 1893, 1894)

on this garden and the royal gardener.]

[Footnote 70: His affection for that city is proved by the

epithet of "Verona tua,' and the legend of the hero; under the

barbarous name of Dietrich of Bern, (Peringsciold and Cochloeum,

p. 240,) Maffei traces him with knowledge and pleasure in his

native country, (l. ix. p. 230 - 236.)]

[Footnote 71: See Maffei, (Verona Illustrata, Part i. p. 231,

232, 308, &c.) His amputes Gothic architecture, like the

corruption of language, writing &c., not to the Barbarians, but

to the Italians themselves.  Compare his sentiments with those of

Tiraboschi, (tom. iii. p. 61.)

     Note: Mr. Hallam (vol. iii. p. 432) observes that "the image

of Theodoric's palace" is represented in Maffei, not from a coin,

but from a seal.  Compare D'Agincourt (Storia dell'arte, Italian

Transl., Arcitecttura, Plate xvii.  No. 2, and Pittura, Plate

xvi. No. 15,) where there is likewise an engraving from a mosaic

in the church of St. Apollinaris in Ravenna, representing a

building ascribed to Theodoric in that city.  Neither of these,

as Mr. Hallam justly observes, in the least approximates to what

is called the Gothic style.  They are evidently the degenerate

Roman architecture, and more resemble the early attempts of our

architects to get back from our national Gothic into a classical

Greek style.  One of them calls to mind Inigo Jones inner

quadrangle in St. John's College Oxford. Compare Hallam and

D'Agincon vol. i. p. 140 - 145. - M]

[Footnote 72: The villas, climate, and landscape of Baiae, (Var.

ix. 6; see Cluver Italia Antiq. l. iv. c. 2, p. 1119, &c.,)

Istria, (Var. xii. 22, 26,) and Comum, (Var. xi. 14; compare with

Pliny's two villas, ix. 7,) are agreeably painted in the Epistles

of Cassiodorus.]

[Footnote 73: In Liguria numerosa agricolarum progenies,

(Ennodius, p. 1678, 1679, 1680.) St. Epiphanius of Pavia redeemed

by prayer or ransom 6000 captives from the Burgundians of Lyons

and Savoy.  Such deeds are the best of miracles.]

[Footnote 74: The political economy of Theodoric (see Anonym.

Vales. p. 721, and Cassiodorus, in Chron.) may be distinctly

traced under the following heads: iron mine, (Var. iii. 23;) gold

mine, (ix. 3;) Pomptine marshes, (ii. 32, 33;) Spoleto, (ii. 21;)

corn, (i. 34, x. 27, 28, xi. 11, 12;) trade, (vi. 7, vii. 9, 23;)

fair of Leucothoe or St. Cyprian in Lucania, (viii. 33;) plenty,

(xii. 4;) the cursus, or public post, (i. 29, ii. 31, iv. 47, v.

5, vi 6, vii. 33;) the Flaminian way, (xii. 18.)

     Note: The inscription commemorative of the draining of the

Pomptine marshes may be found in many works; in Gruter, Inscript.

Ant. Heidelberg, p. 152, No. 8.  With variations, in Nicolai De'

bonificamenti delle terre Pontine, p. 103.  In Sartorius, in his

prize essay on the reign of Theodoric, and Manse Beylage, xi. -

M.]

[Footnote 75: LX modii tritici in solidum ipsius tempore fuerunt,

et vinum xxx amphoras in solidum, (Fragment.  Vales.) Corn was

distributed from the granaries at xv or xxv modii for a piece of

gold, and the price was still moderate.]

     A difference of religion is always pernicious, and often

fatal, to the harmony of the prince and people: the Gothic

conqueror had been educated in the profession of Arianism, and

Italy was devoutly attached to the Nicene faith.  But the

persuasion of Theodoric was not infected by zeal; and he piously

adhered to the heresy of his fathers, without condescending to

balance the subtile arguments of theological metaphysics.

Satisfied with the private toleration of his Arian sectaries, he

justly conceived himself to be the guardian of the public

worship, and his external reverence for a superstition which he

despised, may have nourished in his mind the salutary

indifference of a statesman or philosopher.  The Catholics of his

dominions acknowledged, perhaps with reluctance, the peace of the

church; their clergy, according to the degrees of rank or merit,

were honorably entertained in the palace of Theodoric; he

esteemed the living sanctity of Caesarius ^76 and Epiphanius, ^77

the orthodox bishops of Arles and Pavia; and presented a decent

offering on the tomb of St. Peter, without any scrupulous inquiry

into the creed of the apostle. ^78 His favorite Goths, and even

his mother, were permitted to retain or embrace the Athanasian

faith, and his long reign could not afford the example of an

Italian Catholic, who, either from choice or compulsion, had

deviated into the religion of the conqueror. ^79 The people, and

the Barbarians themselves, were edified by the pomp and order of

religious worship; the magistrates were instructed to defend the

just immunities of ecclesiastical persons and possessions; the

bishops held their synods, the metropolitans exercised their

jurisdiction, and the privileges of sanctuary were maintained or

moderated according to the spirit of the Roman jurisprudence. ^80

With the protection, Theodoric assumed the legal supremacy, of

the church; and his firm administration restored or extended some

useful prerogatives which had been neglected by the feeble

emperors of the West.  He was not ignorant of the dignity and

importance of the Roman pontiff, to whom the venerable name of

Pope was now appropriated.  The peace or the revolt of Italy

might depend on the character of a wealthy and popular bishop,

who claimed such ample dominion both in heaven and earth; who had

been declared in a numerous synod to be pure from all sin, and

exempt from all judgment. ^81 When the chair of St. Peter was

disputed by Symmachus and Laurence, they appeared at his summons

before the tribunal of an Arian monarch, and he confirmed the

election of the most worthy or the most obsequious candidate. At

the end of his life, in a moment of jealousy and resentment, he

prevented the choice of the Romans, by nominating a pope in the

palace of Ravenna.  The danger and furious contests of a schism

were mildly restrained, and the last decree of the senate was

enacted to extinguish, if it were possible, the scandalous

venality of the papal elections. ^82

[Footnote 76: See the life of St. Caesarius in Baronius, (A.D.

508, No. 12, 13, 14.) The king presented him with 300 gold

solidi, and a discus of silver of the weight of sixty pounds.]

[Footnote 77: Ennodius in Vit. St. Epiphanii, in Sirmond, Op.

tom. i. p. 1672 - 1690.  Theodoric bestowed some important favors

on this bishop, whom he used as a counsellor in peace and war.]

[Footnote 78: Devotissimus ac si Catholicus, (Anonym. Vales. p.

720;) yet his offering was no more than two silver candlesticks

(cerostrata) of the weight of seventy pounds, far inferior to the

gold and gems of Constantinople and France, (Anastasius in Vit.

Pont. in Hormisda, p. 34, edit. Paris.)]

[Footnote 79: The tolerating system of his reign (Ennodius, p.

1612.  Anonym. Vales. p. 719.  Procop. Goth. l. i. c. 1, l. ii.

c. 6) may be studied in the Epistles of Cassiodorous, under the

following heads: bishops, (Var. i. 9, vii. 15, 24, xi. 23;)

immunities, (i. 26, ii. 29, 30;) church lands (iv. 17, 20;)

sanctuaries, (ii. 11, iii. 47;) church plate, (xii. 20;)

discipline, (iv. 44;) which prove, at the same time, that he was

the head of the church as well as of the state.

    Note: He recommended the same toleration to the emperor

Justin. - M.]

[Footnote 80: We may reject a foolish tale of his beheading a

Catholic deacon who turned Arian, (Theodor. Lector. No. 17.) Why

is Theodoric surnamed After? From Vafer?  (Vales. ad loc.) A

light conjecture.]

[Footnote 81: Ennodius, p. 1621, 1622, 1636, 1638.  His libel was

approved and registered (synodaliter) by a Roman council,

(Baronius, A.D. 503, No. 6, Franciscus Pagi in Breviar. Pont.

Rom. tom. i. p. 242.)]

[Footnote 82: See Cassiodorus, (Var. viii. 15, ix. 15, 16,)

Anastasius, (in Symmacho, p. 31,) and the xviith Annotation of

Mascou.  Baronius, Pagi, and most of the Catholic doctors,

confess, with an angry growl, this Gothic usurpation.]

     I have descanted with pleasure on the fortunate condition of

Italy; but our fancy must not hastily conceive that the golden

age of the poets, a race of men without vice or misery, was

realized under the Gothic conquest.  The fair prospect was

sometimes overcast with clouds; the wisdom of Theodoric might be

deceived, his power might be resisted and the declining age of

the monarch was sullied with popular hatred and patrician blood.

In the first insolence of victory, he had been tempted to deprive

the whole party of Odoacer of the civil and even the natural

rights of society; ^83 a tax unseasonably imposed after the

calamities of war, would have crushed the rising agriculture of

Liguria; a rigid preemption of corn, which was intended for the

public relief, must have aggravated the distress of Campania.

These dangerous projects were defeated by the virtue and

eloquence of Epiphanius and Boethius, who, in the presence of

Theodoric himself, successfully pleaded the cause of the people:

^84 but if the royal ear was open to the voice of truth, a saint

and a philosopher are not always to be found at the ear of kings.

The privileges of rank, or office, or favor, were too frequently

abused by Italian fraud and Gothic violence, and the avarice of

the king's nephew was publicly exposed, at first by the

usurpation, and afterwards by the restitution of the estates

which he had unjustly extorted from his Tuscan neighbors.  Two

hundred thousand Barbarians, formidable even to their master,

were seated in the heart of Italy; they indignantly supported the

restraints of peace and discipline; the disorders of their march

were always felt and sometimes compensated; and where it was

dangerous to punish, it might be prudent to dissemble, the

sallies of their native fierceness.  When the indulgence of

Theodoric had remitted two thirds of the Ligurian tribute, he

condescended to explain the difficulties of his situation, and to

lament the heavy though inevitable burdens which he imposed on

his subjects for their own defence. ^85 These ungrateful subjects

could never be cordially reconciled to the origin, the religion,

or even the virtues of the Gothic conqueror; past calamities were

forgotten, and the sense or suspicion of injuries was rendered

still more exquisite by the present felicity of the times.

[Footnote 83: He disabled them - alicentia testandi; and all

Italy mourned - lamentabili justitio.  I wish to believe, that

these penalties were enacted against the rebels who had violated

their oath of allegiance; but the testimony of Ennodius (p. 1675

- 1678) is the more weighty, as he lived and died under the reign

of Theodoric.]

[Footnote 84: Ennodius, in Vit. Epiphan. p. 1589, 1690.  Boethius

de Consolatione Philosphiae, l. i. pros. iv. p. 45, 46, 47.

Respect, but weigh the passions of the saint and the senator; and

fortify and alleviate their complaints by the various hints of

Cassiodorus, (ii. 8, iv. 36, viii. 5.)]

[Footnote 85: Immanium expensarum pondus ...pro ipsorum salute,

&c.; yet these are no more than words.]

     Even the religious toleration which Theodoric had the glory

of introducing into the Christian world, was painful and

offensive to the orthodox zeal of the Italians.  They respected

the armed heresy of the Goths; but their pious rage was safely

pointed against the rich and defenceless Jews, who had formed

their establishments at Naples, Rome, Ravenna, Milan, and Genoa,

for the benefit of trade, and under the sanction of the laws. ^86

Their persons were insulted, their effects were pillaged, and

their synagogues were burned by the mad populace of Ravenna and

Rome, inflamed, as it should seem, by the most frivolous or

extravagant pretences.  The government which could neglect, would

have deserved such an outrage.  A legal inquiry was instantly

directed; and as the authors of the tumult had escaped in the

crowd, the whole community was condemned to repair the damage;

and the obstinate bigots, who refused their contributions, were

whipped through the streets by the hand of the executioner. ^*

This simple act of justice exasperated the discontent of the

Catholics, who applauded the merit and patience of these holy

confessors. Three hundred pulpits deplored the persecution of the

church; and if the chapel of St. Stephen at Verona was demolished

by the command of Theodoric, it is probable that some miracle

hostile to his name and dignity had been performed on that sacred

theatre. At the close of a glorious life, the king of Italy

discovered that he had excited the hatred of a people whose

happiness he had so assiduously labored to promote; and his mind

was soured by indignation, jealousy, and the bitterness of

unrequited love.  The Gothic conqueror condescended to disarm the

unwarlike natives of Italy, interdicting all weapons of offence,

and excepting only a small knife for domestic use.  The deliverer

of Rome was accused of conspiring with the vilest informers

against the lives of senators whom he suspected of a secret and

treasonable correspondence with the Byzantine court. ^87 After

the death of Anastasius, the diadem had been placed on the head

of a feeble old man; but the powers of government were assumed by

his nephew Justinian, who already meditated the extirpation of

heresy, and the conquest of Italy and Africa.  A rigorous law,

which was published at Constantinople, to reduce the Arians by

the dread of punishment within the pale of the church, awakened

the just resentment of Theodoric, who claimed for his distressed

brethren of the East the same indulgence which he had so long

granted to the Catholics of his dominions. ^! At his stern

command, the Roman pontiff, with four illustrious senators,

embarked on an embassy, of which he must have alike dreaded the

failure or the success.  The singular veneration shown to the

first pope who had visited Constantinople was punished as a crime

by his jealous monarch; the artful or peremptory refusal of the

Byzantine court might excuse an equal, and would provoke a

larger, measure of retaliation; and a mandate was prepared in

Italy, to prohibit, after a stated day, the exercise of the

Catholic worship.  By the bigotry of his subjects and enemies,

the most tolerant of princes was driven to the brink of

persecution; and the life of Theodoric was too long, since he

lived to condemn the virtue of Boethius and Symmachus. ^88

[Footnote 86: The Jews were settled at Naples, (Procopius, Goth.

l. i. c. 8,) at Genoa, (Var. ii. 28, iv. 33,) Milan, (v. 37,)

Rome, (iv. 43.) See likewise Basnage, Hist. des Juifs, tom. viii.

c. 7, p. 254.]

[Footnote *: See History of the Jews vol. iii. p. 217. - M.]

[Footnote 87: Rex avidus communis exitii, &c., (Boethius, l. i.

p. 59:) rex colum Romanis tendebat, (Anonym. Vales. p. 723.)

These are hard words: they speak the passions of the Italians and

those (I fear) of Theodoric himself.]

[Footnote !: Gibbon should not have omitted the golden words of

Theodoric in a letter which he addressed to Justin: That to

pretend to a dominion over the conscience is to usurp the

prerogative of God; that by the nature of things the power of

sovereigns is confined to external government; that they have no

right of punishment but over those who disturb the public peace,

of which they are the guardians; that the most dangerous heresy

is that of a sovereign who separates from himself a part of his

subjects because they believe not according to his belief.

Compare Le Beau, vol viii. p. 68. - M]

[Footnote 88: I have labored to extract a rational narrative from

the dark, concise, and various hints of the Valesian Fragment,

(p. 722, 723, 724,) Theophanes, (p. 145,) Anastasius, (in

Johanne, p. 35,) and the Hist Miscella, (p. 103, edit. Muratori.)

A gentle pressure and paraphrase of their words is no violence.

Consult likewise Muratori (Annali d' Italia, tom. iv. p. 471 -

478,) with the Annals and Breviary (tom. i. p. 259 - 263) of the

two Pagis, the uncle and the nephew.]

     The senator Boethius ^89 is the last of the Romans whom Cato

or Tully could have acknowledged for their countryman.  As a

wealthy orphan, he inherited the patrimony and honors of the

Anician family, a name ambitiously assumed by the kings and

emperors of the age; and the appellation of Manlius asserted his

genuine or fabulous descent from a race of consuls and dictators,

who had repulsed the Gauls from the Capitol, and sacrificed their

sons to the discipline of the republic.  In the youth of Boethius

the studies of Rome were not totally abandoned; a Virgil ^90 is

now extant, corrected by the hand of a consul; and the professors

of grammar, rhetoric, and jurisprudence, were maintained in their

privileges and pensions by the liberality of the Goths. But the

erudition of the Latin language was insufficient to satiate his

ardent curiosity: and Boethius is said to have employed eighteen

laborious years in the schools of Athens, ^91 which were

supported by the zeal, the learning, and the diligence of Proclus

and his disciples.  The reason and piety of their Roman pupil

were fortunately saved from the contagion of mystery and magic,

which polluted the groves of the academy; but he imbibed the

spirit, and imitated the method, of his dead and living masters,

who attempted to reconcile the strong and subtile sense of

Aristotle with the devout contemplation and sublime fancy of

Plato.  After his return to Rome, and his marriage with the

daughter of his friend, the patrician Symmachus, Boethius still

continued, in a palace of ivory and marble, to prosecute the same

studies. ^92 The church was edified by his profound defence of

the orthodox creed against the Arian, the Eutychian, and the

Nestorian heresies; and the Catholic unity was explained or

exposed in a formal treatise by the indifference of three

distinct though consubstantial persons.  For the benefit of his

Latin readers, his genius submitted to teach the first elements

of the arts and sciences of Greece.  The geometry of Euclid, the

music of Pythagoras, the arithmetic of Nicomachus, the mechanics

of Archimedes, the astronomy of Ptolemy, the theology of Plato,

and the logic of Aristotle, with the commentary of Porphyry, were

translated and illustrated by the indefatigable pen of the Roman

senator.  And he alone was esteemed capable of describing the

wonders of art, a sun-dial, a water-clock, or a sphere which

represented the motions of the planets.  From these abstruse

speculations, Boethius stooped, or, to speak more truly, he rose

to the social duties of public and private life: the indigent

were relieved by his liberality; and his eloquence, which

flattery might compare to the voice of Demosthenes or Cicero, was

uniformly exerted in the cause of innocence and humanity.  Such

conspicuous merit was felt and rewarded by a discerning prince:

the dignity of Boethius was adorned with the titles of consul and

patrician, and his talents were usefully employed in the

important station of master of the offices.  Notwithstanding the

equal claims of the East and West, his two sons were created, in

their tender youth, the consuls of the same year. ^93 On the

memorable day of their inauguration, they proceeded in solemn

pomp from their palace to the forum amidst the applause of the

senate and people; and their joyful father, the true consul of

Rome, after pronouncing an oration in the praise of his royal

benefactor, distributed a triumphal largess in the games of the

circus. Prosperous in his fame and fortunes, in his public honors

and private alliances, in the cultivation of science and the

consciousness of virtue, Boethius might have been styled happy,

if that precarious epithet could be safely applied before the

last term of the life of man.

[Footnote 89: Le Clerc has composed a critical and philosophical

life of Anicius Manlius Severinus Boetius, (Bibliot.  Choisie,

tom. xvi. p. 168 - 275;) and both Tiraboschi (tom. iii.) and

Fabricius (Bibliot Latin.) may be usefully consulted.  The date

of his birth may be placed about the year 470, and his death in

524, in a premature old age, (Consol. Phil. Metrica. i. p. 5.)]

[Footnote 90: For the age and value of this Ms., now in the

Medicean library at Florence, see the Cenotaphia Pisana (p. 430 -

447) of Cardinal Noris.]

[Footnote 91: The Athenian studies of Boethius are doubtful,

(Baronius, A.D. 510, No. 3, from a spurious tract, De Disciplina

Scholarum,) and the term of eighteen years is doubtless too long:

but the simple fact of a visit to Athens is justified by much

internal evidence, (Brucker, Hist. Crit. Philosoph. tom. iii. p.

524 - 527,) and by an expression (though vague and ambiguous) of

his friend Cassiodorus, (Var. i. 45,) "longe positas Athenas

intrioisti."]

[Footnote 92: Bibliothecae comptos ebore ac vitro ^* parietes,

&c., (Consol. Phil. l. i. pros. v. p. 74.) The Epistles of

Ennodius (vi. 6, vii. 13, viii. 1 31, 37, 40) and Cassiodorus

(Var. i. 39, iv. 6, ix. 21) afford many proofs of the high

reputation which he enjoyed in his own times.  It is true, that

the bishop of Pavia wanted to purchase of him an old house at

Milan, and praise might be tendered and accepted in part of

payment.

     Note: Gibbon translated vitro, marble; under the impression,

no doubt that glass was unknown. - M.]

[Footnote 93: Pagi, Muratori, &c., are agreed that Boethius

himself was consul in the year 510, his two sons in 522, and in

487, perhaps, his father. A desire of ascribing the last of these

consulships to the philosopher had perplexed the chronology of

his life.  In his honors, alliances, children, he celebrates his

own felicity - his past felicity, (p. 109 110)]

     A philosopher, liberal of his wealth and parsimonious of his

time, might be insensible to the common allurements of ambition,

the thirst of gold and employment.  And some credit may be due to

the asseveration of Boethius, that he had reluctantly obeyed the

divine Plato, who enjoins every virtuous citizen to rescue the

state from the usurpation of vice and ignorance.  For the

integrity of his public conduct he appeals to the memory of his

country. His authority had restrained the pride and oppression of

the royal officers, and his eloquence had delivered Paulianus

from the dogs of the palace.  He had always pitied, and often

relieved, the distress of the provincials, whose fortunes were

exhausted by public and private rapine; and Boethius alone had

courage to oppose the tyranny of the Barbarians, elated by

conquest, excited by avarice, and, as he complains, encouraged by

impunity.  In these honorable contests his spirit soared above

the consideration of danger, and perhaps of prudence; and we may

learn from the example of Cato, that a character of pure and

inflexible virtue is the most apt to be misled by prejudice, to

be heated by enthusiasm, and to confound private enmities with

public justice.  The disciple of Plato might exaggerate the

infirmities of nature, and the imperfections of society; and the

mildest form of a Gothic kingdom, even the weight of allegiance

and gratitude, must be insupportable to the free spirit of a

Roman patriot.  But the favor and fidelity of Boethius declined

in just proportion with the public happiness; and an unworthy

colleague was imposed to divide and control the power of the

master of the offices.  In the last gloomy season of Theodoric,

he indignantly felt that he was a slave; but as his master had

only power over his life, he stood without arms and without fear

against the face of an angry Barbarian, who had been provoked to

believe that the safety of the senate was incompatible with his

own.  The senator Albinus was accused and already convicted on

the presumption of hoping, as it was said, the liberty of Rome.

"If Albinus be criminal," exclaimed the orator, "the senate and

myself are all guilty of the same crime.  If we are innocent,

Albinus is equally entitled to the protection of the laws." These

laws might not have punished the simple and barren wish of an

unattainable blessing; but they would have shown less indulgence

to the rash confession of Boethius, that, had he known of a

conspiracy, the tyrant never should. ^94 The advocate of Albinus

was soon involved in the danger and perhaps the guilt of his

client; their signature (which they denied as a forgery) was

affixed to the original address, inviting the emperor to deliver

Italy from the Goths; and three witnesses of honorable rank,

perhaps of infamous reputation, attested the treasonable designs

of the Roman patrician. ^95 Yet his innocence must be presumed,

since he was deprived by Theodoric of the means of justification,

and rigorously confined in the tower of Pavia, while the senate,

at the distance of five hundred miles, pronounced a sentence of

confiscation and death against the most illustrious of its

members.  At the command of the Barbarians, the occult science of

a philosopher was stigmatized with the names of sacrilege and

magic. ^96 A devout and dutiful attachment to the senate was

condemned as criminal by the trembling voices of the senators

themselves; and their ingratitude deserved the wish or prediction

of Boethius, that, after him, none should be found guilty of the

same offence. ^97

[Footnote 94: Si ego scissem tu nescisses.  Beothius adopts this

answer (l. i. pros. 4, p. 53) of Julius Canus, whose philosophic

death is described by Seneca, (De Tranquillitate Animi, c. 14.)]

[Footnote 95: The characters of his two delators, Basilius (Var.

ii. 10, 11, iv. 22) and Opilio, (v. 41, viii. 16,) are

illustrated, not much to their honor, in the Epistles of

Cassiodorus, which likewise mention Decoratus, (v. 31,) the

worthless colleague of Beothius, (l. iii. pros. 4, p. 193.)]

[Footnote 96: A severe inquiry was instituted into the crime of

magic, (Var. iv 22, 23, ix. 18;) and it was believed that many

necromancers had escaped by making their jailers mad: for mad I

should read drunk.]

[Footnote 97: Boethius had composed his own Apology, (p. 53,)

perhaps more interesting than his Consolation.  We must be

content with the general view of his honors, principles,

persecution, &c., (l. i. pros. 4, p. 42 - 62,) which may be

compared with the short and weighty words of the Valesian

Fragment, (p. 723.) An anonymous writer (Sinner, Catalog. Mss.

Bibliot. Bern. tom. i. p. 287) charges him home with honorable

and patriotic treason.]

     While Boethius, oppressed with fetters, expected each moment

the sentence or the stroke of death, he composed, in the tower of

Pavia, the Consolation of Philosophy; a golden volume not

unworthy of the leisure of Plato or Tully, but which claims

incomparable merit from the barbarism of the times and the

situation of the author.  The celestial guide, whom he had so

long invoked at Rome and Athens, now condescended to illumine his

dungeon, to revive his courage, and to pour into his wounds her

salutary balm.  She taught him to compare his long prosperity and

his recent distress, and to conceive new hopes from the

inconstancy of fortune.  Reason had informed him of the

precarious condition of her gifts; experience had satisfied him

of their real value; he had enjoyed them without guilt; he might

resign them without a sigh, and calmly disdain the impotent

malice of his enemies, who had left him happiness, since they had

left him virtue.  From the earth, Boethius ascended to heaven in

search of the Supreme Good; explored the metaphysical labyrinth

of chance and destiny, of prescience and free will, of time and

eternity; and generously attempted to reconcile the perfect

attributes of the Deity with the apparent disorders of his moral

and physical government.  Such topics of consolation so obvious,

so vague, or so abstruse, are ineffectual to subdue the feelings

of human nature.  Yet the sense of misfortune may be diverted by

the labor of thought; and the sage who could artfully combine in

the same work the various riches of philosophy, poetry, and

eloquence, must already have possessed the intrepid calmness

which he affected to seek.  Suspense, the worst of evils, was at

length determined by the ministers of death, who executed, and

perhaps exceeded, the inhuman mandate of Theodoric.  A strong

cord was fastened round the head of Boethius, and forcibly

tightened, till his eyes almost started from their sockets; and

some mercy may be discovered in the milder torture of beating him

with clubs till he expired. ^98 But his genius survived to

diffuse a ray of knowledge over the darkest ages of the Latin

world; the writings of the philosopher were translated by the

most glorious of the English kings, ^99 and the third emperor of

the name of Otho removed to a more honorable tomb the bones of a

Catholic saint, who, from his Arian persecutors, had acquired the

honors of martyrdom, and the fame of miracles. ^100 In the last

hours of Boethius, he derived some comfort from the safety of his

two sons, of his wife, and of his father-in-law, the venerable

Symmachus.  But the grief of Symmachus was indiscreet, and

perhaps disrespectful: he had presumed to lament, he might dare

to revenge, the death of an injured friend.  He was dragged in

chains from Rome to the palace of Ravenna; and the suspicions of

Theodoric could only be appeased by the blood of an innocent and

aged senator. ^101

[Footnote 98: He was executed in Agro Calventiano, (Calvenzano,

between Marignano and Pavia,) Anonym.  Vales. p. 723, by order of

Eusebius, count of Ticinum or Pavia.  This place of confinement

is styled the baptistery, an edifice and name peculiar to

cathedrals.  It is claimed by the perpetual tradition of the

church of Pavia.  The tower of Boethius subsisted till the year

1584, and the draught is yet preserved, (Tiraboschi, tom. iii. p.

47, 48.)]

[Footnote 99: See the Biographia Britannica, Alfred, tom. i. p.

80, 2d edition.  The work is still more honorable if performed

under the learned eye of Alfred by his foreign and domestic

doctors.  For the reputation of Boethius in the middle ages,

consult Brucker, (Hist. Crit. Philosoph. tom. iii. p. 565, 566.)]

[Footnote 100: The inscription on his new tomb was composed by

the preceptor of Otho III., the learned Pope Silvester II., who,

like Boethius himself, was styled a magician by the ignorance of

the times. The Catholic martyr had carried his head in his hands

a considerable way, Baronius, A.D. 526, No. 17, 18;) and yet on a

similar tale, a lady of my acquaintance once observed, "La

distance n'y fait rien; il n'y a que lo remier pas qui coute."

     Note: Madame du Deffand.  This witticism referred to the

miracle of St. Denis. - G.]

[Footnote 101: Boethius applauds the virtues of his

father-in-law, (l. i. pros. 4, p. 59, l. ii. pros. 4, p. 118.)

Procopius, (Goth. l. i. c. i.,) the Valesian Fragment, (p. 724,)

and the Historia Miscella, (l. xv. p. 105,) agree in praising the

superior innocence or sanctity of Symmachus; and in the

estimation of the legend, the guilt of his murder is equal to the

imprisonment of a pope.]

     Humanity will be disposed to encourage any report which

testifies the jurisdiction of conscience and the remorse of

kings; and philosophy is not ignorant that the most horrid

spectres are sometimes created by the powers of a disordered

fancy, and the weakness of a distempered body.  After a life of

virtue and glory, Theodoric was now descending with shame and

guilt into the grave; his mind was humbled by the contrast of the

past, and justly alarmed by the invisible terrors of futurity.

One evening, as it is related, when the head of a large fish was

served on the royal table, ^102 he suddenly exclaimed, that he

beheld the angry countenance of Symmachus, his eyes glaring fury

and revenge, and his mouth armed with long sharp teeth, which

threatened to devour him.  The monarch instantly retired to his

chamber, and, as he lay, trembling with aguish cold, under a

weight of bed-clothes, he expressed, in broken murmurs to his

physician Elpidius, his deep repentance for the murders of

Boethius and Symmachus. ^103 His malady increased, and after a

dysentery which continued three days, he expired in the palace of

Ravenna, in the thirty-third, or, if we compute from the invasion

of Italy, in the thirty-seventh year of his reign.  Conscious of

his approaching end, he divided his treasures and provinces

between his two grandsons, and fixed the Rhone as their common

boundary. ^104 Amalaric was restored to the throne of Spain.

Italy, with all the conquests of the Ostrogoths, was bequeathed

to Athalaric; whose age did not exceed ten years, but who was

cherished as the last male offspring of the line of Amali, by the

short-lived marriage of his mother Amalasuntha with a royal

fugitive of the same blood. ^105 In the presence of the dying

monarch, the Gothic chiefs and Italian magistrates mutually

engaged their faith and loyalty to the young prince, and to his

guardian mother; and received, in the same awful moment, his last

salutary advice, to maintain the laws, to love the senate and

people of Rome, and to cultivate with decent reverence the

friendship of the emperor. ^106 The monument of Theodoric was

erected by his daughter Amalasuntha, in a conspicuous situation,

which commanded the city of Ravenna, the harbor, and the adjacent

coast.  A chapel of a circular form, thirty feet in diameter, is

crowned by a dome of one entire piece of granite: from the centre

of the dome four columns arose, which supported, in a vase of

porphyry, the remains of the Gothic king, surrounded by the

brazen statues of the twelve apostles. ^107 His spirit, after

some previous expiation, might have been permitted to mingle with

the benefactors of mankind, if an Italian hermit had not been

witness, in a vision, to the damnation of Theodoric, ^108 whose

soul was plunged, by the ministers of divine vengeance, into the

volcano of Lipari, one of the flaming mouths of the infernal

world. ^109

[Footnote 102: In the fanciful eloquence of Cassiodorus, the

variety of sea and river fish are an evidence of extensive

dominion; and those of the Rhine, of Sicily, and of the Danube,

were served on the table of Theodoric, (Var. xii. 14.) The

monstrous turbot of Domitian (Juvenal Satir. iii. 39) had been

caught on the shores of the Adriatic.]

[Footnote 103: Procopius, Goth. l. i. c. 1.  But he might have

informed us, whether he had received this curious anecdote from

common report or from the mouth of the royal physician.]

[Footnote 104: Procopius, Goth. l. i. c. 1, 2, 12, 13.  This

partition had been directed by Theodoric, though it was not

executed till after his death, Regni hereditatem superstes

reliquit, (Isidor. Chron. p. 721, edit. Grot.)]

[Footnote 105: Berimund, the third in descent from Hermanric,

king of the Ostrogoths, had retired into Spain, where he lived

and died in obscurity, (Jornandes, c. 33, p. 202, edit.

Muratori.) See the discovery, nuptials, and death of his grandson

Eutharic, (c. 58, p. 220.) His Roman games might render him

popular, (Cassiodor. in Chron.,) but Eutharic was asper in

religione, (Anonym. Vales. p. 723.)]

[Footnote 106: See the counsels of Theodoric, and the professions

of his successor, in Procopius, (Goth. l. i. c. 1, 2,) Jornandes,

(c. 59, p. 220, 221,) and Cassiodorus, (Var. viii. 1 - 7.) These

epistles are the triumph of his ministerial eloquence.]

[Footnote 107: Anonym. Vales. p. 724.  Agnellus de Vitis.  Pont.

Raven. in Muratori Script. Rerum Ital. tom. ii. P. i. p. 67.

Alberti Descrittione d' Italia, p. 311.

     Note: The Mausoleum of Theodoric, now Sante Maria della

Rotonda, is engraved in D'Agincourt, Histoire de l'Art, p xviii.

of the Architectural Prints. - M]

[Footnote 108: This legend is related by Gregory I., (Dialog. iv.

36,) and approved by Baronius, (A.D. 526, No. 28;) and both the

pope and cardinal are grave doctors, sufficient to establish a

probable opinion.]

[Footnote 109: Theodoric himself, or rather Cassiodorus, had

described in tragic strains the volcanos of Lipari (Cluver.

Sicilia, p. 406 - 410) and Vesuvius, (v 50.)]

Chapter XL: Reign Of Justinian.

Part I.

     Elevation Of Justin The Elder. - Reign Of Justinian. - I.

The Empress Theodora. - II.  Factions Of The Circus, And Sedition

Of Constantinople. - III.  Trade And Manufacture Of Silk. - IV.

Finances And Taxes. - V. Edifices Of Justinian. - Church Of St.

Sophia. - Fortifications And Frontiers Of The Eastern Empire. -

Abolition Of The Schools Of Athens, And The Consulship Of Rome.

     The emperor Justinian was born ^1 near the ruins of Sardica,

(the modern Sophia,) of an obscure race ^2 of Barbarians, ^3 the

inhabitants of a wild and desolate country, to which the names of

Dardania, of Dacia, and of Bulgaria, have been successively

applied.  His elevation was prepared by the adventurous spirit of

his uncle Justin, who, with two other peasants of the same

village, deserted, for the profession of arms, the more useful

employment of husbandmen or shepherds. ^4 On foot, with a scanty

provision of biscuit in their knapsacks, the three youths

followed the high road of Constantinople, and were soon enrolled,

for their strength and stature, among the guards of the emperor

Leo.  Under the two succeeding reigns, the fortunate peasant

emerged to wealth and honors; and his escape from some dangers

which threatened his life was afterwards ascribed to the guardian

angel who watches over the fate of kings. His long and laudable

service in the Isaurian and Persian wars would not have preserved

from oblivion the name of Justin; yet they might warrant the

military promotion, which in the course of fifty years he

gradually obtained; the rank of tribune, of count, and of

general; the dignity of senator, and the command of the guards,

who obeyed him as their chief, at the important crisis when the

emperor Anastasius was removed from the world.  The powerful

kinsmen whom he had raised and enriched were excluded from the

throne; and the eunuch Amantius, who reigned in the palace, had

secretly resolved to fix the diadem on the head of the most

obsequious of his creatures.  A liberal donative, to conciliate

the suffrage of the guards, was intrusted for that purpose in the

hands of their commander.  But these weighty arguments were

treacherously employed by Justin in his own favor; and as no

competitor presumed to appear, the Dacian peasant was invested

with the purple by the unanimous consent of the soldiers, who

knew him to be brave and gentle, of the clergy and people, who

believed him to be orthodox, and of the provincials, who yielded

a blind and implicit submission to the will of the capital.  The

elder Justin, as he is distinguished from another emperor of the

same family and name, ascended the Byzantine throne at the age of

sixty-eight years; and, had he been left to his own guidance,

every moment of a nine years' reign must have exposed to his

subjects the impropriety of their choice.  His ignorance was

similar to that of Theodoric; and it is remarkable that in an age

not destitute of learning, two contemporary monarchs had never

been instructed in the knowledge of the alphabet. ^* But the

genius of Justin was far inferior to that of the Gothic king: the

experience of a soldier had not qualified him for the government

of an empire; and though personally brave, the consciousness of

his own weakness was naturally attended with doubt, distrust, and

political apprehension.  But the official business of the state

was diligently and faithfully transacted by the quaestor Proclus;

^5 and the aged emperor adopted the talents and ambition of his

nephew Justinian, an aspiring youth, whom his uncle had drawn

from the rustic solitude of Dacia, and educated at

Constantinople, as the heir of his private fortune, and at length

of the Eastern empire.

[Footnote 1: There is some difficulty in the date of his birth

(Ludewig in Vit. Justiniani, p. 125;) none in the place - the

district Bederiana - the village Tauresium, which he afterwards

decorated with his name and splendor, (D'Anville, Hist. de

l'Acad. &c., tom. xxxi. p. 287 - 292.)]

[Footnote 2: The names of these Dardanian peasants are Gothic,

and almost English: Justinian is a translation of uprauda,

(upright;) his father Sabatius (in Graeco-barbarous language

stipes) was styled in his village Istock, (Stock;) his mother

Bigleniza was softened into Vigilantia.]

[Footnote 3: Ludewig (p. 127 - 135) attempts to justify the

Anician name of Justinian and Theodora, and to connect them with

a family from which the house of Austria has been derived.]

[Footnote 4: See the anecdotes of Procopius, (c. 6,) with the

notes of N. Alemannus.  The satirist would not have sunk, in the

vague and decent appellation of Zonaras.  Yet why are those names

disgraceful? - and what German baron would not be proud to

descend from the Eumaeus of the Odyssey!

     Note: It is whimsical enough that, in our own days, we

should have, even in jest, a claimant to lineal descent from the

godlike swineherd not in the person of a German baron, but in

that of a professor of the Ionian University.  Constantine

Koliades, or some malicious wit under this name, has written a

tall folio to prove Ulysses to be Homer, and himself the

descendant, the heir (?), of the Eumaeus of the Odyssey. - M]

[Footnote *: St. Martin questions the fact in both cases.  The

ignorance of Justin rests on the secret history of Procopius,

vol. viii. p. 8.  St. Martin's notes on Le Beau. - M]

[Footnote 5: His virtues are praised by Procopius, (Persic. l. i.

c. 11.) The quaestor Proclus was the friend of Justinian, and the

enemy of every other adoption.]

     Since the eunuch Amantius had been defrauded of his money,

it became necessary to deprive him of his life.  The task was

easily accomplished by the charge of a real or fictitious

conspiracy; and the judges were informed, as an accumulation of

guilt, that he was secretly addicted to the Manichaean heresy. ^6

Amantius lost his head; three of his companions, the first

domestics of the palace, were punished either with death or

exile; and their unfortunate candidate for the purple was cast

into a deep dungeon, overwhelmed with stones, and ignominiously

thrown, without burial, into the sea.  The ruin of Vitalian was a

work of more difficulty and danger.  That Gothic chief had

rendered himself popular by the civil war which he boldly waged

against Anastasius for the defence of the orthodox faith, and

after the conclusion of an advantageous treaty, he still remained

in the neighborhood of Constantinople at the head of a formidable

and victorious army of Barbarians. By the frail security of

oaths, he was tempted to relinquish this advantageous situation,

and to trust his person within the walls of a city, whose

inhabitants, particularly the blue faction, were artfully

incensed against him by the remembrance even of his pious

hostilities.  The emperor and his nephew embraced him as the

faithful and worthy champion of the church and state; and

gratefully adorned their favorite with the titles of consul and

general; but in the seventh month of his consulship, Vitalian was

stabbed with seventeen wounds at the royal banquet; ^7 and

Justinian, who inherited the spoil, was accused as the assassin

of a spiritual brother, to whom he had recently pledged his faith

in the participation of the Christian mysteries. ^8 After the

fall of his rival, he was promoted, without any claim of military

service, to the office of master-general of the Eastern armies,

whom it was his duty to lead into the field against the public

enemy.  But, in the pursuit of fame, Justinian might have lost

his present dominion over the age and weakness of his uncle; and

instead of acquiring by Scythian or Persian trophies the applause

of his countrymen, ^9 the prudent warrior solicited their favor

in the churches, the circus, and the senate, of Constantinople.

The Catholics were attached to the nephew of Justin, who, between

the Nestorian and Eutychian heresies, trod the narrow path of

inflexible and intolerant orthodoxy. ^10 In the first days of the

new reign, he prompted and gratified the popular enthusiasm

against the memory of the deceased emperor.  After a schism of

thirty-four years, he reconciled the proud and angry spirit of

the Roman pontiff, and spread among the Latins a favorable report

of his pious respect for the apostolic see.  The thrones of the

East were filled with Catholic bishops, devoted to his interest,

the clergy and the monks were gained by his liberality, and the

people were taught to pray for their future sovereign, the hope

and pillar of the true religion.  The magnificence of Justinian

was displayed in the superior pomp of his public spectacles, an

object not less sacred and important in the eyes of the multitude

than the creed of Nice or Chalcedon: the expense of his

consulship was esteemed at two hundred and twenty-eight thousand

pieces of gold; twenty lions, and thirty leopards, were produced

at the same time in the amphitheatre, and a numerous train of

horses, with their rich trappings, was bestowed as an

extraordinary gift on the victorious charioteers of the circus.

While he indulged the people of Constantinople, and received the

addresses of foreign kings, the nephew of Justin assiduously

cultivated the friendship of the senate.  That venerable name

seemed to qualify its members to declare the sense of the nation,

and to regulate the succession of the Imperial throne: the feeble

Anastasius had permitted the vigor of government to degenerate

into the form or substance of an aristocracy; and the military

officers who had obtained the senatorial rank were followed by

their domestic guards, a band of veterans, whose arms or

acclamations might fix in a tumultuous moment the diadem of the

East.  The treasures of the state were lavished to procure the

voices of the senators, and their unanimous wish, that he would

be pleased to adopt Justinian for his colleague, was communicated

to the emperor.  But this request, which too clearly admonished

him of his approaching end, was unwelcome to the jealous temper

of an aged monarch, desirous to retain the power which he was

incapable of exercising; and Justin, holding his purple with both

his hands, advised them to prefer, since an election was so

profitable, some older candidate.  Not withstanding this

reproach, the senate proceeded to decorate Justinian with the

royal epithet of nobilissimus; and their decree was ratified by

the affection or the fears of his uncle.  After some time the

languor of mind and body, to which he was reduced by an incurable

wound in his thigh, indispensably required the aid of a guardian.

He summoned the patriarch and senators; and in their presence

solemnly placed the diadem on the head of his nephew, who was

conducted from the palace to the circus, and saluted by the loud

and joyful applause of the people.  The life of Justin was

prolonged about four months; but from the instant of this

ceremony, he was considered as dead to the empire, which

acknowledged Justinian, in the forty-fifth year of his age, for

the lawful sovereign of the East. ^11

[Footnote 6: Manichaean signifies Eutychian.  Hear the furious

acclamations of Constantinople and Tyre, the former no more than

six days after the decease of Anastasius.  They produced, the

latter applauded, the eunuch's death, (Baronius, A.D. 518, P. ii.

No. 15.  Fleury, Hist Eccles. tom. vii. p. 200, 205, from the

Councils, tom. v. p. 182, 207.)]

[Footnote 7: His power, character, and intentions, are perfectly

explained by the court de Buat, (tom. ix. p. 54 - 81.) He was

great-grandson of Aspar, hereditary prince in the Lesser Scythia,

and count of the Gothic foederati of Thrace.  The Bessi, whom he

could influence, are the minor Goths of Jornandes, (c. 51.)]

[Footnote 8: Justiniani patricii factione dicitur interfectus

fuisse, (Victor Tu nunensis, Chron. in Thesaur. Temp. Scaliger,

P. ii. p. 7.) Procopius (Anecdot. c. 7) styles him a tyrant, but

acknowledges something which is well explained by Alemannus.]

[Footnote 9: In his earliest youth (plane adolescens) he had

passed some time as a hostage with Theodoric.  For this curious

fact, Alemannus (ad Procop. Anecdot. c. 9, p. 34, of the first

edition) quotes a Ms. history of Justinian, by his preceptor

Theophilus. Ludewig (p. 143) wishes to make him a soldier.]

[Footnote 10: The ecclesiastical history of Justinian will be

shown hereafter. See Baronius, A.D. 518 - 521, and the copious

article Justinianas in the index to the viith volume of his

Annals.]

[Footnote 11: The reign of the elder Justin may be found in the

three Chronicles of Marcellinus, Victor, and John Malala, (tom.

ii. p. 130 - 150,) the last of whom (in spite of Hody, Prolegom.

No. 14, 39, edit. Oxon.) lived soon after Justinian, (Jortin's

Remarks, &c., vol. iv p. 383:) in the Ecclesiastical History of

Evagrius, (l. iv. c. 1, 2, 3, 9,) and the Excerpta of Theodorus

Lector, (No. 37,) and in Cedrenus, (p. 362 - 366,) and Zonaras,

(l. xiv. p. 58 - 61,) who may pass for an original.

     Note: Dindorf, in his preface to the new edition of Malala,

p. vi., concurs with this opinion of Gibbon, which was also that

of Reiske, as to the age of the chronicler. - M.]

     From his elevation to his death, Justinian governed the

Roman empire thirty-eight years, seven months, and thirteen days.

The events of his reign, which excite our curious attention by

their number, variety, and importance, are diligently related by

the secretary of Belisarius, a rhetorician, whom eloquence had

promoted to the rank of senator and praefect of Constantinople.

According to the vicissitudes of courage or servitude, of favor

or disgrace, Procopius ^12 successively composed the history, the

panegyric, and the satire of his own times.  The eight books of

the Persian, Vandalic, and Gothic wars, ^13 which are continued

in the five books of Agathias, deserve our esteem as a laborious

and successful imitation of the Attic, or at least of the

Asiatic, writers of ancient Greece.  His facts are collected from

the personal experience and free conversation of a soldier, a

statesman, and a traveller; his style continually aspires, and

often attains, to the merit of strength and elegance; his

reflections, more especially in the speeches, which he too

frequently inserts, contain a rich fund of political knowledge;

and the historian, excited by the generous ambition of pleasing

and instructing posterity, appears to disdain the prejudices of

the people, and the flattery of courts.  The writings of

Procopius ^14 were read and applauded by his contemporaries: ^15

but, although he respectfully laid them at the foot of the

throne, the pride of Justinian must have been wounded by the

praise of a hero, who perpetually eclipses the glory of his

inactive sovereign.  The conscious dignity of independence was

subdued by the hopes and fears of a slave; and the secretary of

Belisarius labored for pardon and reward in the six books of the

Imperial edifices.  He had dexterously chosen a subject of

apparent splendor, in which he could loudly celebrate the genius,

the magnificence, and the piety of a prince, who, both as a

conqueror and legislator, had surpassed the puerile virtues of

Themistocles and Cyrus. ^16 Disappointment might urge the

flatterer to secret revenge; and the first glance of favor might

again tempt him to suspend and suppress a libel, ^17 in which the

Roman Cyrus is degraded into an odious and contemptible tyrant,

in which both the emperor and his consort Theodora are seriously

represented as two daemons, who had assumed a human form for the

destruction of mankind. ^18 Such base inconsistency must

doubtless sully the reputation, and detract from the credit, of

Procopius: yet, after the venom of his malignity has been

suffered to exhale, the residue of the anecdotes, even the most

disgraceful facts, some of which had been tenderly hinted in his

public history, are established by their internal evidence, or

the authentic monuments of the times. ^19 ^* From these various

materials, I shall now proceed to describe the reign of

Justinian, which will deserve and occupy an ample space.  The

present chapter will explain the elevation and character of

Theodora, the factions of the circus, and the peaceful

administration of the sovereign of the East.  In the three

succeeding chapters, I shall relate the wars of Justinian, which

achieved the conquest of Africa and Italy; and I shall follow the

victories of Belisarius and Narses, without disguising the vanity

of their triumphs, or the hostile virtue of the Persian and

Gothic heroes. The series of this and the following volume will

embrace the jurisprudence and theology of the emperor; the

controversies and sects which still divide the Oriental church;

the reformation of the Roman law which is obeyed or respected by

the nations of modern Europe.

[Footnote 12: See the characters of Procopius and Agathias in La

Mothe le Vayer, (tom. viii. p. 144 - 174,) Vossius, (de

Historicis Graecis, l. ii. c. 22,) and Fabricius, (Bibliot.

Graec. l. v. c. 5, tom. vi. p. 248 - 278.) Their religion, an

honorable problem, betrays occasional conformity, with a secret

attachment to Paganism and Philosophy.]

[Footnote 13: In the seven first books, two Persic, two Vandalic,

and three Gothic, Procopius has borrowed from Appian the division

of provinces and wars: the viiith book, though it bears the name

of Gothic, is a miscellaneous and general supplement down to the

spring of the year 553, from whence it is continued by Agathias

till 559, (Pagi, Critica, A.D. 579, No. 5.)]

[Footnote 14: The literary fate of Procopius has been somewhat

unlucky.

     1. His book de Bello Gothico were stolen by Leonard Aretin,

and published (Fulginii, 1470, Venet. 1471, apud Janson.

Mattaire, Annal Typograph. tom. i. edit. posterior, p. 290, 304,

279, 299,) in his own name, (see Vossius de Hist. Lat. l. iii. c.

5, and the feeble defence of the Venice Giornale de Letterati,

tom. xix. p. 207.)

     2. His works were mutilated by the first Latin translators,

Christopher Persona, (Giornale, tom. xix. p. 340 - 348,) and

Raphael de Volaterra, (Huet, de Claris Interpretibus, p. 166,)

who did not even consult the Ms. of the Vatican library, of which

they were praefects, (Aleman. in Praefat Anecdot.)

     3. The Greek text was not printed till 1607, by Hoeschelius

of Augsburg, (Dictionnaire de Bayle, tom. ii. p. 782.)

     4. The Paris edition was imperfectly executed by Claude

Maltret, a Jesuit of Toulouse, (in 1663,) far distant from the

Louvre press and the Vatican Ms., from which, however, he

obtained some supplements.  His promised commentaries, &c., have

never appeared.  The Agathias of Leyden (1594) has been wisely

reprinted by the Paris editor, with the Latin version of

Bonaventura Vulcanius, a learned interpreter, (Huet, p. 176.)

     Note: Procopius forms a part of the new Byzantine collection

under the superintendence of Dindorf. - M.]

[Footnote 15: Agathias in Praefat. p. 7, 8, l. iv. p. 137.

Evagrius, l. iv. c. 12.  See likewise Photius, cod. lxiii. p.

65.]

[Footnote 16: Says, he, Praefat. ad l. de Edificiis is no more

than a pun!  In these five books, Procopius affects a Christian

as well as a courtly style.]

[Footnote 17: Procopius discloses himself, (Praefat. ad Anecdot.

c. 1, 2, 5,) and the anecdotes are reckoned as the ninth book by

Suidas, (tom. iii. p. 186, edit. Kuster.) The silence of Evagrius

is a poor objection.  Baronius (A.D. 548, No. 24) regrets the

loss of this secret history: it was then in the Vatican library,

in his own custody, and was first published sixteen years after

his death, with the learned, but partial notes of Nicholas

Alemannus, (Lugd. 1623.)]

[Footnote 18: Justinian an ass - the perfect likeness of Domitian

- Anecdot. c. 8. - Theodora's lovers driven from her bed by rival

daemons - her marriage foretold with a great daemon - a monk saw

the prince of the daemons, instead of Justinian, on the throne -

the servants who watched beheld a face without features, a body

walking without a head, &c., &c.  Procopius declares his own and

his friends' belief in these diabolical stories, (c. 12.)]

[Footnote 19: Montesquieu (Considerations sur la Grandeur et la

Decadence des Romains, c. xx.) gives credit to these anecdotes,

as connected, 1. with the weakness of the empire, and, 2. with

the instability of Justinian's laws.]

[Footnote *: The Anecdota of Procopius, compared with the former

works of the same author, appear to me the basest and most

disgraceful work in literature. The wars, which he has described

in the former volumes as glorious or necessary, are become

unprofitable and wanton massacres; the buildings which he

celebrated, as raised to the immortal honor of the great emperor,

and his admirable queen, either as magnificent embellishments of

the city, or useful fortifications for the defence of the

frontier, are become works of vain prodigality and useless

ostentation.  I doubt whether Gibbon has made sufficient

allowance for the "malignity" of the Anecdota; at all events, the

extreme and disgusting profligacy of Theodora's early life rests

entirely on this viratent libel - M.]

     I.  In the exercise of supreme power, the first act of

Justinian was to divide it with the woman whom he loved, the

famous Theodora, ^20 whose strange elevation cannot be applauded

as the triumph of female virtue.  Under the reign of Anastasius,

the care of the wild beasts maintained by the green faction at

Constantinople was intrusted to Acacius, a native of the Isle of

Cyprus, who, from his employment, was surnamed the master of the

bears.  This honorable office was given after his death to

another candidate, notwithstanding the diligence of his widow,

who had already provided a husband and a successor.  Acacius had

left three daughters, Comito, ^21 Theodora, and Anastasia, the

eldest of whom did not then exceed the age of seven years.  On a

solemn festival, these helpless orphans were sent by their

distressed and indignant mother, in the garb of suppliants, into

the midst of the theatre: the green faction received them with

contempt, the blues with compassion; and this difference, which

sunk deep into the mind of Theodora, was felt long afterwards in

the administration of the empire.  As they improved in age and

beauty, the three sisters were successively devoted to the public

and private pleasures of the Byzantine people: and Theodora,

after following Comito on the stage, in the dress of a slave,

with a stool on her head, was at length permitted to exercise her

independent talents.  She neither danced, nor sung, nor played on

the flute; her skill was confined to the pantomime arts; she

excelled in buffoon characters, and as often as the comedian

swelled her cheeks, and complained with a ridiculous tone and

gesture of the blows that were inflicted, the whole theatre of

Constantinople resounded with laughter and applause.  The beauty

of Theodora ^22 was the subject of more flattering praise, and

the source of more exquisite delight. Her features were delicate

and regular; her complexion, though somewhat pale, was tinged

with a natural color; every sensation was instantly expressed by

the vivacity of her eyes; her easy motions displayed the graces

of a small but elegant figure; and either love or adulation might

proclaim, that painting and poetry were incapable of delineating

the matchless excellence of her form.  But this form was degraded

by the facility with which it was exposed to the public eye, and

prostituted to licentious desire.  Her venal charms were

abandoned to a promiscuous crowd of citizens and strangers of

every rank, and of every profession: the fortunate lover who had

been promised a night of enjoyment, was often driven from her bed

by a stronger or more wealthy favorite; and when she passed

through the streets, her presence was avoided by all who wished

to escape either the scandal or the temptation. The satirical

historian has not blushed ^23 to describe the naked scenes which

Theodora was not ashamed to exhibit in the theatre. ^24 After

exhausting the arts of sensual pleasure, ^25 she most

ungratefully murmured against the parsimony of Nature; ^26 but

her murmurs, her pleasures, and her arts, must be veiled in the

obscurity of a learned language.  After reigning for some time,

the delight and contempt of the capital, she condescended to

accompany Ecebolus, a native of Tyre, who had obtained the

government of the African Pentapolis.  But this union was frail

and transient; Ecebolus soon rejected an expensive or faithless

concubine; she was reduced at Alexandria to extreme distress; and

in her laborious return to Constantinople, every city of the East

admired and enjoyed the fair Cyprian, whose merit appeared to

justify her descent from the peculiar island of Venus. The vague

commerce of Theodora, and the most detestable precautions,

preserved her from the danger which she feared; yet once, and

once only, she became a mother.  The infant was saved and

educated in Arabia, by his father, who imparted to him on his

death-bed, that he was the son of an empress.  Filled with

ambitious hopes, the unsuspecting youth immediately hastened to

the palace of Constantinople, and was admitted to the presence of

his mother.  As he was never more seen, even after the decease of

Theodora, she deserves the foul imputation of extinguishing with

his life a secret so offensive to her Imperial virtue.

[Footnote 20: For the life and manners of the empress Theodora

see the Anecdotes; more especially c. 1 - 5, 9, 10 - 15, 16, 17,

with the learned notes of Alemannus - a reference which is always

implied.]

[Footnote 21: Comito was afterwards married to Sittas, duke of

Armenia, the father, perhaps, at least she might be the mother,

of the empress Sophia. Two nephews of Theodora may be the sons of

Anastasia, (Aleman. p. 30, 31.)]

[Footnote 22: Her statute was raised at Constantinople, on a

porphyry column. See Procopius, (de Edif. l. i. c. 11,) who gives

her portrait in the Anecdotes, (c. 10.) Aleman. (p. 47) produces

one from a Mosaic at Ravenna, loaded with pearls and jewels, and

yet handsome.]

[Footnote 23: A fragment of the Anecdotes, (c. 9,) somewhat too

naked, was suppressed by Alemannus, though extant in the Vatican

Ms.; nor has the defect been supplied in the Paris or Venice

editions.  La Mothe le Vayer (tom. viii. p. 155) gave the first

hint of this curious and genuine passage, (Jortin's Remarks, vol.

iv. p. 366,) which he had received from Rome, and it has been

since published in the Menagiana (tom. iii. p. 254 - 259) with a

Latin version.]

[Footnote 24: After the mention of a narrow girdle, (as none

could appear stark naked in the theatre,) Procopius thus

proceeds.  I have heard that a learned prelate, now deceased, was

fond of quoting this passage in conversation.]

[Footnote 25: Theodora surpassed the Crispa of Ausonius, (Epigram

lxxi.,) who imitated the capitalis luxus of the females of Nola.

See Quintilian Institut. viii. 6, and Torrentius ad Horat.

Sermon. l. i. sat. 2, v. 101.  At a memorable supper, thirty

slaves waited round the table ten young men feasted with

Theodora.  Her charity was universal.

Et lassata viris, necdum satiata, recessit.]

[Footnote 26: She wished for a fourth altar, on which she might

pour libations to the god of love.]

[Footnote *: Gibbon should have remembered the axiom which he

quotes in another piece, scelera ostendi oportet dum puniantur

abscondi flagitia. - M.]

     In the most abject state of her fortune, and reputation,

some vision, either of sleep or of fancy, had whispered to

Theodora the pleasing assurance that she was destined to become

the spouse of a potent monarch.  Conscious of her approaching

greatness, she returned from Paphlagonia to Constantinople;

assumed, like a skilful actress, a more decent character;

relieved her poverty by the laudable industry of spinning wool;

and affected a life of chastity and solitude in a small house,

which she afterwards changed into a magnificent temple. ^27 Her

beauty, assisted by art or accident, soon attracted, captivated,

and fixed, the patrician Justinian, who already reigned with

absolute sway under the name of his uncle.  Perhaps she contrived

to enhance the value of a gift which she had so often lavished on

the meanest of mankind; perhaps she inflamed, at first by modest

delays, and at last by sensual allurements, the desires of a

lover, who, from nature or devotion, was addicted to long vigils

and abstemious diet.  When his first transports had subsided, she

still maintained the same ascendant over his mind, by the more

solid merit of temper and understanding.  Justinian delighted to

ennoble and enrich the object of his affection; the treasures of

the East were poured at her feet, and the nephew of Justin was

determined, perhaps by religious scruples, to bestow on his

concubine the sacred and legal character of a wife. But the laws

of Rome expressly prohibited the marriage of a senator with any

female who had been dishonored by a servile origin or theatrical

profession: the empress Lupicina, or Euphemia, a Barbarian of

rustic manners, but of irreproachable virtue, refused to accept a

prostitute for her niece; and even Vigilantia, the superstitious

mother of Justinian, though she acknowledged the wit and beauty

of Theodora, was seriously apprehensive, lest the levity and

arrogance of that artful paramour might corrupt the piety and

happiness of her son.  These obstacles were removed by the

inflexible constancy of Justinian. He patiently expected the

death of the empress; he despised the tears of his mother, who

soon sunk under the weight of her affliction; and a law was

promulgated in the name of the emperor Justin, which abolished

the rigid jurisprudence of antiquity.  A glorious repentance (the

words of the edict) was left open for the unhappy females who had

prostituted their persons on the theatre, and they were permitted

to contract a legal union with the most illustrious of the

Romans. ^28 This indulgence was speedily followed by the solemn

nuptials of Justinian and Theodora; her dignity was gradually

exalted with that of her lover, and, as soon as Justin had

invested his nephew with the purple, the patriarch of

Constantinople placed the diadem on the heads of the emperor and

empress of the East.  But the usual honors which the severity of

Roman manners had allowed to the wives of princes, could not

satisfy either the ambition of Theodora or the fondness of

Justinian.  He seated her on the throne as an equal and

independent colleague in the sovereignty of the empire, and an

oath of allegiance was imposed on the governors of the provinces

in the joint names of Justinian and Theodora. ^29 The Eastern

world fell prostrate before the genius and fortune of the

daughter of Acacius.  The prostitute who, in the presence of

innumerable spectators, had polluted the theatre of

Constantinople, was adored as a queen in the same city, by grave

magistrates, orthodox bishops, victorious generals, and captive

monarchs. ^30

[Footnote 27: Anonym. de Antiquitat. C. P. l. iii. 132, in

Banduri Imperium Orient. tom. i. p. 48.  Ludewig (p. 154) argues

sensibly that Theodora would not have immortalized a brothel: but

I apply this fact to her second and chaster residence at

Constantinople.]

[Footnote 28: See the old law in Justinian's Code, (l. v. tit. v.

leg. 7, tit. xxvii. leg. 1,) under the years 336 and 454.  The

new edict (about the year 521 or 522, Aleman. p. 38, 96) very

awkwardly repeals no more than the clause of mulieres scenicoe,

libertinae, tabernariae.  See the novels 89 and 117, and a Greek

rescript from Justinian to the bishops, (Aleman. p. 41.)]

[Footnote 29: I swear by the Father, &c., by the Virgin Mary, by

the four Gospels, quae in manibus teneo, and by the Holy

Archangels Michael and Gabriel, puram conscientiam germanumque

servitium me servaturum, sacratissimis DDNN.  Justiniano et

Theodorae conjugi ejus, (Novell. viii. tit. 3.) Would the oath

have been binding in favor of the widow?  Communes tituli et

triumphi, &c., (Aleman. p. 47, 48.)]

[Footnote 30: "Let greatness own her, and she's mean no more,"

&c.  Without Warburton's critical telescope, I should never have

seen, in this general picture of triumphant vice, any personal

allusion to Theodora.]

Chapter XL: Reign Of Justinian.

Part II.

     Those who believe that the female mind is totally depraved

by the loss of chastity, will eagerly listen to all the

invectives of private envy, or popular resentment which have

dissembled the virtues of Theodora, exaggerated her vices, and

condemned with rigor the venal or voluntary sins of the youthful

harlot.  From a motive of shame, or contempt, she often declined

the servile homage of the multitude, escaped from the odious

light of the capital, and passed the greatest part of the year in

the palaces and gardens which were pleasantly seated on the

sea-coast of the Propontis and the Bosphorus.  Her private hours

were devoted to the prudent as well as grateful care of her

beauty, the luxury of the bath and table, and the long slumber of

the evening and the morning.  Her secret apartments were occupied

by the favorite women and eunuchs, whose interests and passions

she indulged at the expense of justice; the most illustrious

person ages of the state were crowded into a dark and sultry

antechamber, and when at last, after tedious attendance, they

were admitted to kiss the feet of Theodora, they experienced, as

her humor might suggest, the silent arrogance of an empress, or

the capricious levity of a comedian.  Her rapacious avarice to

accumulate an immense treasure, may be excused by the

apprehension of her husband's death, which could leave no

alternative between ruin and the throne; and fear as well as

ambition might exasperate Theodora against two generals, who,

during the malady of the emperor, had rashly declared that they

were not disposed to acquiesce in the choice of the capital.  But

the reproach of cruelty, so repugnant even to her softer vices,

has left an indelible stain on the memory of Theodora.  Her

numerous spies observed, and zealously reported, every action, or

word, or look, injurious to their royal mistress. Whomsoever they

accused were cast into her peculiar prisons, ^31 inaccessible to

the inquiries of justice; and it was rumored, that the torture of

the rack, or scourge, had been inflicted in the presence of the

female tyrant, insensible to the voice of prayer or of pity. ^32

Some of these unhappy victims perished in deep, unwholesome

dungeons, while others were permitted, after the loss of their

limbs, their reason, or their fortunes, to appear in the world,

the living monuments of her vengeance, which was commonly

extended to the children of those whom she had suspected or

injured.  The senator or bishop, whose death or exile Theodora

had pronounced, was delivered to a trusty messenger, and his

diligence was quickened by a menace from her own mouth.  "If you

fail in the execution of my commands, I swear by Him who liveth

forever, that your skin shall be flayed from your body." ^33

[Footnote 31: Her prisons, a labyrinth, a Tartarus, (Anecdot. c.

4,) were under the palace.  Darkness is propitious to cruelty,

but it is likewise favorable to calumny and fiction.]

[Footnote 32: A more jocular whipping was inflicted on

Saturninus, for presuming to say that his wife, a favorite of the

empress, had not been found. (Anecdot. c. 17.)]

[Footnote 33: Per viventem in saecula excoriari te faciam.

Anastasius de Vitis Pont. Roman. in Vigilio, p. 40.]

     If the creed of Theodora had not been tainted with heresy,

her exemplary devotion might have atoned, in the opinion of her

contemporaries, for pride, avarice, and cruelty.  But, if she

employed her influence to assuage the intolerant fury of the

emperor, the present age will allow some merit to her religion,

and much indulgence to her speculative errors. ^34 The name of

Theodora was introduced, with equal honor, in all the pious and

charitable foundations of Justinian; and the most benevolent

institution of his reign may be ascribed to the sympathy of the

empress for her less fortunate sisters, who had been seduced or

compelled to embrace the trade of prostitution.  A palace, on the

Asiatic side of the Bosphorus, was converted into a stately and

spacious monastery, and a liberal maintenance was assigned to

five hundred women, who had been collected from the streets and

brothels of Constantinople. In this safe and holy retreat, they

were devoted to perpetual confinement; and the despair of some,

who threw themselves headlong into the sea, was lost in the

gratitude of the penitents, who had been delivered from sin and

misery by their generous benefactress. ^35 The prudence of

Theodora is celebrated by Justinian himself; and his laws are

attributed to the sage counsels of his most reverend wife whom he

had received as the gift of the Deity. ^36 Her courage was

displayed amidst the tumult of the people and the terrors of the

court.  Her chastity, from the moment of her union with

Justinian, is founded on the silence of her implacable enemies;

and although the daughter of Acacius might be satiated with love,

yet some applause is due to the firmness of a mind which could

sacrifice pleasure and habit to the stronger sense either of duty

or interest.  The wishes and prayers of Theodora could never

obtain the blessing of a lawful son, and she buried an infant

daughter, the sole offspring of her marriage. ^37 Notwithstanding

this disappointment, her dominion was permanent and absolute; she

preserved, by art or merit, the affections of Justinian; and

their seeming dissensions were always fatal to the courtiers who

believed them to be sincere.  Perhaps her health had been

impaired by the licentiousness of her youth; but it was always

delicate, and she was directed by her physicians to use the

Pythian warm baths.  In this journey, the empress was followed by

the Praetorian praefect, the great treasurer, several counts and

patricians, and a splendid train of four thousand attendants: the

highways were repaired at her approach; a palace was erected for

her reception; and as she passed through Bithynia, she

distributed liberal alms to the churches, the monasteries, and

the hospitals, that they might implore Heaven for the restoration

of her health. ^38 At length, in the twenty-fourth year of her

marriage, and the twenty-second of her reign, she was consumed by

a cancer; ^39 and the irreparable loss was deplored by her

husband, who, in the room of a theatrical prostitute, might have

selected the purest and most noble virgin of the East. ^40

[Footnote 34: Ludewig, p. 161 - 166.  I give him credit for the

charitable attempt, although he hath not much charity in his

temper.]

[Footnote 35: Compare the anecdotes (c. 17) with the Edifices (l.

i. c. 9) - how differently may the same fact be stated!  John

Malala (tom. ii. p. 174, 175) observes, that on this, or a

similar occasion, she released and clothed the girls whom she had

purchased from the stews at five aurei apiece.]

[Footnote 36: Novel. viii. 1. An allusion to Theodora.  Her

enemies read the name Daemonodora, (Aleman. p. 66.)]

[Footnote 37: St. Sabas refused to pray for a son of Theodora,

lest he should prove a heretic worse than Anastasius himself,

(Cyril in Vit. St. Sabae, apud Aleman. p. 70, 109.)]

[Footnote 38: See John Malala, tom. ii. p. 174.  Theophanes, p.

158. Procopius de Edific. l. v. c. 3.]

[Footnote 39: Theodora Chalcedonensis synodi inimica canceris

plaga toto corpore perfusa vitam prodigiose finivit, (Victor

Tununensis in Chron.) On such occasions, an orthodox mind is

steeled against pity.  Alemannus (p. 12, 13) understands of

Theophanes as civil language, which does not imply either piety

or repentance; yet two years after her death, St. Theodora is

celebrated by Paul Silentiarius, (in proem. v. 58 - 62.)]

[Footnote 40: As she persecuted the popes, and rejected a

council, Baronius exhausts the names of Eve, Dalila, Herodias,

&c.; after which he has recourse to his infernal dictionary:

civis inferni - alumna daemonum - satanico agitata spiritu -

oestro percita diabolico, &c., &c., (A.D. 548, No. 24.)]

     II.  A material difference may be observed in the games of

antiquity: the most eminent of the Greeks were actors, the Romans

were merely spectators. The Olympic stadium was open to wealth,

merit, and ambition; and if the candidates could depend on their

personal skill and activity, they might pursue the footsteps of

Diomede and Menelaus, and conduct their own horses in the rapid

career. ^41 Ten, twenty, forty chariots were allowed to start at

the same instant; a crown of leaves was the reward of the victor;

and his fame, with that of his family and country, was chanted in

lyric strains more durable than monuments of brass and marble.

But a senator, or even a citizen, conscious of his dignity, would

have blushed to expose his person, or his horses, in the circus

of Rome.  The games were exhibited at the expense of the

republic, the magistrates, or the emperors: but the reins were

abandoned to servile hands; and if the profits of a favorite

charioteer sometimes exceeded those of an advocate, they must be

considered as the effects of popular extravagance, and the high

wages of a disgraceful profession.  The race, in its first

institution, was a simple contest of two chariots, whose drivers

were distinguished by white and red liveries: two additional

colors, a light green, and a caerulean blue, were afterwards

introduced; and as the races were repeated twenty-five times, one

hundred chariots contributed in the same day to the pomp of the

circus.  The four factions soon acquired a legal establishment,

and a mysterious origin, and their fanciful colors were derived

from the various appearances of nature in the four seasons of the

year; the red dogstar of summer, the snows of winter, the deep

shades of autumn, and the cheerful verdure of the spring. ^42

Another interpretation preferred the elements to the seasons, and

the struggle of the green and blue was supposed to represent the

conflict of the earth and sea.  Their respective victories

announced either a plentiful harvest or a prosperous navigation,

and the hostility of the husbandmen and mariners was somewhat

less absurd than the blind ardor of the Roman people, who devoted

their lives and fortunes to the color which they had espoused.

Such folly was disdained and indulged by the wisest princes; but

the names of Caligula, Nero, Vitellius, Verus, Commodus,

Caracalla, and Elagabalus, were enrolled in the blue or green

factions of the circus; they frequented their stables, applauded

their favorites, chastised their antagonists, and deserved the

esteem of the populace, by the natural or affected imitation of

their manners.  The bloody and tumultuous contest continued to

disturb the public festivity, till the last age of the spectacles

of Rome; and Theodoric, from a motive of justice or affection,

interposed his authority to protect the greens against the

violence of a consul and a patrician, who were passionately

addicted to the blue faction of the circus. ^43

[Footnote 41: Read and feel the xxiid book of the Iliad, a living

picture of manners, passions, and the whole form and spirit of

the chariot race West's Dissertation on the Olympic Games (sect.

xii. - xvii.) affords much curious and authentic information.]

[Footnote 42: The four colors, albati, russati, prasini, veneti,

represent the four seasons, according to Cassiodorus, (Var. iii.

51,) who lavishes much wit and eloquence on this theatrical

mystery.  Of these colors, the three first may be fairly

translated white, red, and green.  Venetus is explained by

coeruleus, a word various and vague: it is properly the sky

reflected in the sea; but custom and convenience may allow blue

as an equivalent, (Robert. Stephan. sub voce.  Spence's

Polymetis, p. 228.)]

[Footnote 43: See Onuphrius Panvinius de Ludis Circensibus, l. i.

c. 10, 11; the xviith Annotation on Mascou's History of the

Germans; and Aleman ad c. vii.]

     Constantinople adopted the follies, though not the virtues,

of ancient Rome; and the same factions which had agitated the

circus, raged with redoubled fury in the hippodrome.  Under the

reign of Anastasius, this popular frenzy was inflamed by

religious zeal; and the greens, who had treacherously concealed

stones and daggers under baskets of fruit, massacred, at a solemn

festival, three thousand of their blue adversaries. ^44 From this

capital, the pestilence was diffused into the provinces and

cities of the East, and the sportive distinction of two colors

produced two strong and irreconcilable factions, which shook the

foundations of a feeble government. ^45 The popular dissensions,

founded on the most serious interest, or holy pretence, have

scarcely equalled the obstinacy of this wanton discord, which

invaded the peace of families, divided friends and brothers, and

tempted the female sex, though seldom seen in the circus, to

espouse the inclinations of their lovers, or to contradict the

wishes of their husbands.  Every law, either human or divine, was

trampled under foot, and as long as the party was successful, its

deluded followers appeared careless of private distress or public

calamity. The license, without the freedom, of democracy, was

revived at Antioch and Constantinople, and the support of a

faction became necessary to every candidate for civil or

ecclesiastical honors.  A secret attachment to the family or sect

of Anastasius was imputed to the greens; the blues were zealously

devoted to the cause of orthodoxy and Justinian, ^46 and their

grateful patron protected, above five years, the disorders of a

faction, whose seasonable tumults overawed the palace, the

senate, and the capitals of the East.  Insolent with royal favor,

the blues affected to strike terror by a peculiar and Barbaric

dress, the long hair of the Huns, their close sleeves and ample

garments, a lofty step, and a sonorous voice.  In the day they

concealed their two-edged poniards, but in the night they boldly

assembled in arms, and in numerous bands, prepared for every act

of violence and rapine. Their adversaries of the green faction,

or even inoffensive citizens, were stripped and often murdered by

these nocturnal robbers, and it became dangerous to wear any gold

buttons or girdles, or to appear at a late hour in the streets of

a peaceful capital.  A daring spirit, rising with impunity,

proceeded to violate the safeguard of private houses; and fire

was employed to facilitate the attack, or to conceal the crimes

of these factious rioters. No place was safe or sacred from their

depredations; to gratify either avarice or revenge, they

profusely spilt the blood of the innocent; churches and altars

were polluted by atrocious murders; and it was the boast of the

assassins, that their dexterity could always inflict a mortal

wound with a single stroke of their dagger.  The dissolute youth

of Constantinople adopted the blue livery of disorder; the laws

were silent, and the bonds of society were relaxed: creditors

were compelled to resign their obligations; judges to reverse

their sentence; masters to enfranchise their slaves; fathers to

supply the extravagance of their children; noble matrons were

prostituted to the lust of their servants; beautiful boys were

torn from the arms of their parents; and wives, unless they

preferred a voluntary death, were ravished in the presence of

their husbands. ^47 The despair of the greens, who were

persecuted by their enemies, and deserted by the magistrates,

assumed the privilege of defence, perhaps of retaliation; but

those who survived the combat were dragged to execution, and the

unhappy fugitives, escaping to woods and caverns, preyed without

mercy on the society from whence they were expelled. Those

ministers of justice who had courage to punish the crimes, and to

brave the resentment, of the blues, became the victims of their

indiscreet zeal; a praefect of Constantinople fled for refuge to

the holy sepulchre, a count of the East was ignominiously

whipped, and a governor of Cilicia was hanged, by the order of

Theodora, on the tomb of two assassins whom he had condemned for

the murder of his groom, and a daring attack upon his own life.

^48 An aspiring candidate may be tempted to build his greatness

on the public confusion, but it is the interest as well as duty

of a sovereign to maintain the authority of the laws.  The first

edict of Justinian, which was often repeated, and sometimes

executed, announced his firm resolution to support the innocent,

and to chastise the guilty, of every denomination and color.  Yet

the balance of justice was still inclined in favor of the blue

faction, by the secret affection, the habits, and the fears of

the emperor; his equity, after an apparent struggle, submitted,

without reluctance, to the implacable passions of Theodora, and

the empress never forgot, or forgave, the injuries of the

comedian.  At the accession of the younger Justin, the

proclamation of equal and rigorous justice indirectly condemned

the partiality of the former reign.  "Ye blues, Justinian is no

more!  ye greens, he is still alive!" ^49

[Footnote 44: Marcellin. in Chron. p. 47.  Instead of the vulgar

word venata he uses the more exquisite terms of coerulea and

coerealis.  Baronius (A.D. 501, No. 4, 5, 6) is satisfied that

the blues were orthodox; but Tillemont is angry at the

supposition, and will not allow any martyrs in a playhouse,

(Hist. des Emp. tom. vi. p. 554.)]

[Footnote 45: See Procopius, (Persic. l. i. c. 24.) In describing

the vices of the factions and of the government, the public, is

not more favorable than the secret, historian.  Aleman. (p. 26)

has quoted a fine passage from Gregory Nazianzen, which proves

the inveteracy of the evil.]

[Footnote 46: The partiality of Justinian for the blues (Anecdot.

c. 7) is attested by Evagrius, (Hist. Eccles. l. iv. c. 32,) John

Malala, (tom ii p. 138, 139,) especially for Antioch; and

Theophanes, (p. 142.)]

[Footnote 47: A wife, (says Procopius,) who was seized and almost

ravished by a blue-coat, threw herself into the Bosphorus.  The

bishops of the second Syria (Aleman. p. 26) deplore a similar

suicide, the guilt or glory of female chastity, and name the

heroine.]

[Footnote 48: The doubtful credit of Procopius (Anecdot. c. 17)

is supported by the less partial Evagrius, who confirms the fact,

and specifies the names. The tragic fate of the praefect of

Constantinople is related by John Malala, (tom. ii. p. 139.)]

[Footnote 49: See John Malala, (tom. ii. p. 147;) yet he owns

that Justinian was attached to the blues.  The seeming discord of

the emperor and Theodora is, perhaps, viewed with too much

jealousy and refinement by Procopius, (Anecdot. c. 10.) See

Aleman. Praefat. p. 6.]

     A sedition, which almost laid Constantinople in ashes, was

excited by the mutual hatred and momentary reconciliation of the

two factions.  In the fifth year of his reign, Justinian

celebrated the festival of the ides of January; the games were

incessantly disturbed by the clamorous discontent of the greens:

till the twenty-second race, the emperor maintained his silent

gravity; at length, yielding to his impatience, he condescended

to hold, in abrupt sentences, and by the voice of a crier, the

most singular dialogue ^50 that ever passed between a prince and

his subjects.  Their first complaints were respectful and modest;

they accused the subordinate ministers of oppression, and

proclaimed their wishes for the long life and victory of the

emperor.  "Be patient and attentive, ye insolent railers!"

exclaimed Justinian; "be mute, ye Jews, Samaritans, and

Manichaeans!" The greens still attempted to awaken his

compassion.  "We are poor, we are innocent, we are injured, we

dare not pass through the streets: a general persecution is

exercised against our name and color.  Let us die, O emperor! but

let us die by your command, and for your service!" But the

repetition of partial and passionate invectives degraded, in

their eyes, the majesty of the purple; they renounced allegiance

to the prince who refused justice to his people; lamented that

the father of Justinian had been born; and branded his son with

the opprobrious names of a homicide, an ass, and a perjured

tyrant.  "Do you despise your lives?" cried the indignant

monarch: the blues rose with fury from their seats; their hostile

clamors thundered in the hippodrome; and their adversaries,

deserting the unequal contest spread terror and despair through

the streets of Constantinople.  At this dangerous moment, seven

notorious assassins of both factions, who had been condemned by

the praefect, were carried round the city, and afterwards

transported to the place of execution in the suburb of Pera.

Four were immediately beheaded; a fifth was hanged: but when the

same punishment was inflicted on the remaining two, the rope

broke, they fell alive to the ground, the populace applauded

their escape, and the monks of St. Conon, issuing from the

neighboring convent, conveyed them in a boat to the sanctuary of

the church. ^51 As one of these criminals was of the blue, and

the other of the green livery, the two factions were equally

provoked by the cruelty of their oppressor, or the ingratitude of

their patron; and a short truce was concluded till they had

delivered their prisoners and satisfied their revenge.  The

palace of the praefect, who withstood the seditious torrent, was

instantly burnt, his officers and guards were massacred, the

prisons were forced open, and freedom was restored to those who

could only use it for the public destruction.  A military force,

which had been despatched to the aid of the civil magistrate, was

fiercely encountered by an armed multitude, whose numbers and

boldness continually increased; and the Heruli, the wildest

Barbarians in the service of the empire, overturned the priests

and their relics, which, from a pious motive, had been rashly

interposed to separate the bloody conflict.  The tumult was

exasperated by this sacrilege, the people fought with enthusiasm

in the cause of God; the women, from the roofs and windows,

showered stones on the heads of the soldiers, who darted fire

brands against the houses; and the various flames, which had been

kindled by the hands of citizens and strangers, spread without

control over the face of the city.  The conflagration involved

the cathedral of St. Sophia, the baths of Zeuxippus, a part of

the palace, from the first entrance to the altar of Mars, and the

long portico from the palace to the forum of Constantine: a large

hospital, with the sick patients, was consumed; many churches and

stately edifices were destroyed and an immense treasure of gold

and silver was either melted or lost.  From such scenes of horror

and distress, the wise and wealthy citizens escaped over the

Bosphorus to the Asiatic side; and during five days

Constantinople was abandoned to the factions, whose watchword,

Nika, vanquish!  has given a name to this memorable sedition. ^52

[Footnote 50: This dialogue, which Theophanes has preserved,

exhibits the popular language, as well as the manners, of

Constantinople, in the vith century.  Their Greek is mingled with

many strange and barbarous words, for which Ducange cannot always

find a meaning or etymology.]

[Footnote 51: See this church and monastery in Ducange, C. P.

Christiana, l. iv p 182.]

[Footnote 52: The history of the Nika sedition is extracted from

Marcellinus, (in Chron.,) Procopius, (Persic. l. i. c. 26,) John

Malala, (tom. ii. p. 213 - 218,) Chron. Paschal., (p. 336 - 340,)

Theophanes, (Chronograph. p. 154 - 158) and Zonaras, (l. xiv. p.

61 - 63.)]

     As long as the factions were divided, the triumphant blues,

and desponding greens, appeared to behold with the same

indifference the disorders of the state.  They agreed to censure

the corrupt management of justice and the finance; and the two

responsible ministers, the artful Tribonian, and the rapacious

John of Cappadocia, were loudly arraigned as the authors of the

public misery.  The peaceful murmurs of the people would have

been disregarded: they were heard with respect when the city was

in flames; the quaestor, and the praefect, were instantly

removed, and their offices were filled by two senators of

blameless integrity.  After this popular concession, Justinian

proceeded to the hippodrome to confess his own errors, and to

accept the repentance of his grateful subjects; but they

distrusted his assurances, though solemnly pronounced in the

presence of the holy Gospels; and the emperor, alarmed by their

distrust, retreated with precipitation to the strong fortress of

the palace.  The obstinacy of the tumult was now imputed to a

secret and ambitious conspiracy, and a suspicion was entertained,

that the insurgents, more especially the green faction, had been

supplied with arms and money by Hypatius and Pompey, two

patricians, who could neither forget with honor, nor remember

with safety, that they were the nephews of the emperor

Anastasius.  Capriciously trusted, disgraced, and pardoned, by

the jealous levity of the monarch, they had appeared as loyal

servants before the throne; and, during five days of the tumult,

they were detained as important hostages; till at length, the

fears of Justinian prevailing over his prudence, he viewed the

two brothers in the light of spies, perhaps of assassins, and

sternly commanded them to depart from the palace.  After a

fruitless representation, that obedience might lead to

involuntary treason, they retired to their houses, and in the

morning of the sixth day, Hypatius was surrounded and seized by

the people, who, regardless of his virtuous resistance, and the

tears of his wife, transported their favorite to the forum of

Constantine, and instead of a diadem, placed a rich collar on his

head.  If the usurper, who afterwards pleaded the merit of his

delay, had complied with the advice of his senate, and urged the

fury of the multitude, their first irresistible effort might have

oppressed or expelled his trembling competitor.  The Byzantine

palace enjoyed a free communication with the sea; vessels lay

ready at the garden stairs; and a secret resolution was already

formed, to convey the emperor with his family and treasures to a

safe retreat, at some distance from the capital.

     Justinian was lost, if the prostitute whom he raised from

the theatre had not renounced the timidity, as well as the

virtues, of her sex.  In the midst of a council, where Belisarius

was present, Theodora alone displayed the spirit of a hero; and

she alone, without apprehending his future hatred, could save the

emperor from the imminent danger, and his unworthy fears.  "If

flight," said the consort of Justinian, "were the only means of

safety, yet I should disdain to fly.  Death is the condition of

our birth; but they who have reigned should never survive the

loss of dignity and dominion.  I implore Heaven, that I may never

be seen, not a day, without my diadem and purple; that I may no

longer behold the light, when I cease to be saluted with the name

of queen.  If you resolve, O Caesar!  to fly, you have treasures;

behold the sea, you have ships; but tremble lest the desire of

life should expose you to wretched exile and ignominious death.

For my own part, I adhere to the maxim of antiquity, that the

throne is a glorious sepulchre." The firmness of a woman restored

the courage to deliberate and act, and courage soon discovers the

resources of the most desperate situation.  It was an easy and a

decisive measure to revive the animosity of the factions; the

blues were astonished at their own guilt and folly, that a

trifling injury should provoke them to conspire with their

implacable enemies against a gracious and liberal benefactor;

they again proclaimed the majesty of Justinian; and the greens,

with their upstart emperor, were left alone in the hippodrome.

The fidelity of the guards was doubtful; but the military force

of Justinian consisted in three thousand veterans, who had been

trained to valor and discipline in the Persian and Illyrian wars.

Under the command of Belisarius and Mundus, they silently marched

in two divisions from the palace, forced their obscure way

through narrow passages, expiring flames, and falling edifices,

and burst open at the same moment the two opposite gates of the

hippodrome.  In this narrow space, the disorderly and affrighted

crowd was incapable of resisting on either side a firm and

regular attack; the blues signalized the fury of their

repentance; and it is computed, that above thirty thousand

persons were slain in the merciless and promiscuous carnage of

the day.  Hypatius was dragged from his throne, and conducted,

with his brother Pompey, to the feet of the emperor: they

implored his clemency; but their crime was manifest, their

innocence uncertain, and Justinian had been too much terrified to

forgive. The next morning the two nephews of Anastasius, with

eighteen illustrious accomplices, of patrician or consular rank,

were privately executed by the soldiers; their bodies were thrown

into the sea, their palaces razed, and their fortunes

confiscated. The hippodrome itself was condemned, during several

years, to a mournful silence: with the restoration of the games,

the same disorders revived; and the blue and green factions

continued to afflict the reign of Justinian, and to disturb the

tranquility of the Eastern empire. ^53

[Footnote 53: Marcellinus says in general terms, innumeris

populis in circotrucidatis.  Procopius numbers 30,000 victims:

and the 35,000 of Theophanes are swelled to 40,000 by the more

recent Zonaras.  Such is the usual progress of exaggeration.]

     III. That empire, after Rome was barbarous, still embraced

the nations whom she had conquered beyond the Adriatic, and as

far as the frontiers of Aethiopia and Persia.  Justinian reigned

over sixty-four provinces, and nine hundred and thirty-five

cities; ^54 his dominions were blessed by nature with the

advantages of soil, situation, and climate: and the improvements

of human art had been perpetually diffused along the coast of the

Mediterranean and the banks of the Nile from ancient Troy to the

Egyptian Thebes.  Abraham ^55 had been relieved by the well-known

plenty of Egypt; the same country, a small and populous tract,

was still capable of exporting, each year, two hundred and sixty

thousand quarters of wheat for the use of Constantinople; ^56 and

the capital of Justinian was supplied with the manufactures of

Sidon, fifteen centuries after they had been celebrated in the

poems of Homer. ^57 The annual powers of vegetation, instead of

being exhausted by two thousand harvests, were renewed and

invigorated by skilful husbandry, rich manure, and seasonable

repose.  The breed of domestic animals was infinitely multiplied.

Plantations, buildings, and the instruments of labor and luxury,

which are more durable than the term of human life, were

accumulated by the care of successive generations.  Tradition

preserved, and experience simplified, the humble practice of the

arts: society was enriched by the division of labor and the

facility of exchange; and every Roman was lodged, clothed, and

subsisted, by the industry of a thousand hands.  The invention of

the loom and distaff has been piously ascribed to the gods.  In

every age, a variety of animal and vegetable productions, hair,

skins, wool, flax, cotton, and at length silk, have been

skilfully manufactured to hide or adorn the human body; they were

stained with an infusion of permanent colors; and the pencil was

successfully employed to improve the labors of the loom.  In the

choice of those colors ^58 which imitate the beauties of nature,

the freedom of taste and fashion was indulged; but the deep

purple ^59 which the Phoenicians extracted from a shell-fish, was

restrained to the sacred person and palace of the emperor; and

the penalties of treason were denounced against the ambitious

subjects who dared to usurp the prerogative of the throne. ^60

[Footnote 54: Hierocles, a contemporary of Justinian, composed

his (Itineraria, p. 631,) review of the eastern provinces and

cities, before the year 535, (Wesseling, in Praefat. and Not. ad

p. 623, &c.)]

[Footnote 55: See the Book of Genesis (xii. 10) and the

administration of Joseph.  The annals of the Greeks and Hebrews

agree in the early arts and plenty of Egypt: but this antiquity

supposes a long series of improvement; and Warburton, who is

almost stifled by the Hebrew calls aloud for the Samaritan,

Chronology, (Divine Legation, vol. iii. p. 29, &c.)

     Note: The recent extraordinary discoveries in Egyptian

antiquities strongly confirm the high notion of the early

Egyptian civilization, and imperatively demand a longer period

for their development. As to the common Hebrew chronology, as far

as such a subject is capable of demonstration, it appears to me

to have been framed, with a particular view, by the Jews of

Tiberias.  It was not the chronology of the Samaritans, not that

of the LXX., not that of Josephus, not that of St. Paul. - M.]

[Footnote 56: Eight millions of Roman modii, besides a

contribution of 80,000 aurei for the expenses of water-carriage,

from which the subject was graciously excused.  See the 13th

Edict of Justinian: the numbers are checked and verified by the

agreement of the Greek and Latin texts.]

[Footnote 57: Homer's Iliad, vi. 289.  These veils, were the work

of the Sidonian women.  But this passage is more honorable to the

manufactures than to the navigation of Phoenicia, from whence

they had been imported to Troy in Phrygian bottoms.]

[Footnote 58: See in Ovid (de Arte Amandi, iii. 269, &c.) a

poetical list of twelve colors borrowed from flowers, the

elements, &c.  But it is almost impossible to discriminate by

words all the nice and various shades both of art and nature.]

[Footnote 59: By the discovery of cochineal, &c., we far surpass

the colors of antiquity.  Their royal purple had a strong smell,

and a dark cast as deep as bull's blood - obscuritas rubens,

(says Cassiodorus, Var. 1, 2,) nigredo saguinea.  The president

Goguet (Origine des Loix et des Arts, part ii. l. ii. c. 2, p.

184 - 215) will amuse and satisfy the reader.  I doubt whether

his book, especially in England, is as well known as it deserves

to be.]

[Footnote 60: Historical proofs of this jealousy have been

occasionally introduced, and many more might have been added; but

the arbitrary acts of despotism were justified by the sober and

general declarations of law, (Codex Theodosian. l. x. tit. 21,

leg. 3.  Codex Justinian. l. xi. tit. 8, leg. 5.) An inglorious

permission, and necessary restriction, was applied to the mince,

the female dancers, (Cod. Theodos. l. xv. tit. 7, leg. 11.)]

Chapter XL: Reign Of Justinian.

Part III.

     I need not explain that silk ^61 is originally spun from the

bowels of a caterpillar, and that it composes the golden tomb,

from whence a worm emerges in the form of a butterfly.  Till the

reign of Justinian, the silk- worm who feed on the leaves of the

white mulberry-tree were confined to China; those of the pine,

the oak, and the ash, were common in the forests both of Asia and

Europe; but as their education is more difficult, and their

produce more uncertain, they were generally neglected, except in

the little island of Ceos, near the coast of Attica. A thin gauze

was procured from their webs, and this Cean manufacture, the

invention of a woman, for female use, was long admired both in

the East and at Rome.  Whatever suspicions may be raised by the

garments of the Medes and Assyrians, Virgil is the most ancient

writer, who expressly mentions the soft wool which was combed

from the trees of the Seres or Chinese; ^62 and this natural

error, less marvellous than the truth, was slowly corrected by

the knowledge of a valuable insect, the first artificer of the

luxury of nations.  That rare and elegant luxury was censured, in

the reign of Tiberius, by the gravest of the Romans; and Pliny,

in affected though forcible language, has condemned the thirst of

gain, which explores the last confines of the earth, for the

pernicious purpose of exposing to the public eye naked draperies

and transparent matrons. ^63 ^* A dress which showed the turn of

the limbs, and color of the skin, might gratify vanity, or

provoke desire; the silks which had been closely woven in China

were sometimes unravelled by the Phoenician women, and the

precious materials were multiplied by a looser texture, and the

intermixture of linen threads. ^64 Two hundred years after the

age of Pliny, the use of pure, or even of mixed silks, was

confined to the female sex, till the opulent citizens of Rome and

the provinces were insensibly familiarized with the example of

Elagabalus, the first who, by this effeminate habit, had sullied

the dignity of an emperor and a man.  Aurelian complained, that a

pound of silk was sold at Rome for twelve ounces of gold; but the

supply increased with the demand, and the price diminished with

the supply.  If accident or monopoly sometimes raised the value

even above the standard of Aurelian, the manufacturers of Tyre

and Berytus were sometimes compelled, by the operation of the

same causes, to content themselves with a ninth part of that

extravagant rate. ^65 A law was thought necessary to discriminate

the dress of comedians from that of senators; and of the silk

exported from its native country the far greater part was

consumed by the subjects of Justinian.  They were still more

intimately acquainted with a shell-fish of the Mediterranean,

surnamed the silk-worm of the sea: the fine wool or hair by which

the mother-of-pearl affixes itself to the rock is now

manufactured for curiosity rather than use; and a robe obtained

from the same singular materials was the gift of the Roman

emperor to the satraps of Armenia. ^66

[Footnote 61: In the history of insects (far more wonderful than

Ovid's Metamorphoses) the silk-worm holds a conspicuous place.

The bombyx of the Isle of Ceos, as described by Pliny, (Hist.

Natur. xi. 26, 27, with the notes of the two learned Jesuits,

Hardouin and Brotier,) may be illustrated by a similar species in

China, (Memoires sur les Chinois, tom. ii. p. 575 - 598;) but our

silk-worm, as well as the white mulberry-tree, were unknown to

Theophrastus and Pliny.]

[Footnote 62: Georgic. ii. 121.  Serica quando venerint in usum

planissime non acio: suspicor tamen in Julii Caesaris aevo, nam

ante non invenio, says Justus Lipsius, (Excursus i. ad Tacit.

Annal. ii. 32.) See Dion Cassius, (l. xliii. p. 358, edit.

Reimar,) and Pausanius, (l. vi. p. 519,) the first who describes,

however strangely, the Seric insect.]

[Footnote 63: Tam longinquo orbe petitur, ut in publico matrona

transluceat ...ut denudet foeminas vestis, (Plin. vi. 20, xi.

21.) Varro and Publius Syrus had already played on the Toga

vitrea, ventus texilis, and nebula linen, (Horat. Sermon. i. 2,

101, with the notes of Torrentius and Dacier.)]

[Footnote *: Gibbon must have written transparent draperies and

naked matrons. Through sometimes affected, he is never

inaccurate. - M.]

[Footnote 64: On the texture, colors, names, and use of the silk,

half silk, and liuen garments of antiquity, see the profound,

diffuse, and obscure researches of the great Salmasius, (in Hist.

August. p. 127, 309, 310, 339, 341, 342, 344, 388 - 391, 395,

513,) who was ignorant of the most common trades of Dijon or

Leyden.]

[Footnote 65: Flavius Vopiscus in Aurelian. c. 45, in Hist.

August. p. 224. See Salmasius ad Hist. Aug. p. 392, and Plinian.

Exercitat. in Solinum, p. 694, 695.  The Anecdotes of Procopius

(c. 25) state a partial and imperfect rate of the price of silk

in the time of Justinian.]

[Footnote 66: Procopius de Edit. l. iii. c. 1.  These pinnes de

mer are found near Smyrna, Sicily, Corsica, and Minorca; and a

pair of gloves of their silk was presented to Pope Benedict XIV.]

     A valuable merchandise of small bulk is capable of defraying

the expense of land-carriage; and the caravans traversed the

whole latitude of Asia in two hundred and forty-three days from

the Chinese Ocean to the sea-coast of Syria. Silk was immediately

delivered to the Romans by the Persian merchants, ^67 who

frequented the fairs of Armenia and Nisibis; but this trade,

which in the intervals of truce was oppressed by avarice and

jealousy, was totally interrupted by the long wars of the rival

monarchies.  The great king might proudly number Sogdiana, and

even Serica, among the provinces of his empire; but his real

dominion was bounded by the Oxus and his useful intercourse with

the Sogdoites, beyond the river, depended on the pleasure of

their conquerors, the white Huns, and the Turks, who successively

reigned over that industrious people.  Yet the most savage

dominion has not extirpated the seeds of agriculture and

commerce, in a region which is celebrated as one of the four

gardens of Asia; the cities of Samarcand and Bochara are

advantageously seated for the exchange of its various

productions; and their merchants purchased from the Chinese, ^68

the raw or manufactured silk which they transported into Persia

for the use of the Roman empire.  In the vain capital of China,

the Sogdian caravans were entertained as the suppliant embassies

of tributary kingdoms, and if they returned in safety, the bold

adventure was rewarded with exorbitant gain.  But the difficult

and perilous march from Samarcand to the first town of Shensi,

could not be performed in less than sixty, eighty, or one hundred

days: as soon as they had passed the Jaxartes they entered the

desert; and the wandering hordes, unless they are restrained by

armies and garrisons, have always considered the citizen and the

traveller as the objects of lawful rapine.  To escape the Tartar

robbers, and the tyrants of Persia, the silk caravans explored a

more southern road; they traversed the mountains of Thibet,

descended the streams of the Ganges or the Indus, and patiently

expected, in the ports of Guzerat and Malabar, the annual fleets

of the West. ^69 But the dangers of the desert were found less

intolerable than toil, hunger, and the loss of time; the attempt

was seldom renewed, and the only European who has passed that

unfrequented way, applauds his own diligence, that, in nine

months after his departure from Pekin, he reached the mouth of

the Indus.  The ocean, however, was open to the free

communication of mankind. From the great river to the tropic of

Cancer, the provinces of China were subdued and civilized by the

emperors of the North; they were filled about the time of the

Christian aera with cities and men, mulberry- trees and their

precious inhabitants; and if the Chinese, with the knowledge of

the compass, had possessed the genius of the Greeks or

Phoenicians, they might have spread their discoveries over the

southern hemisphere.  I am not qualified to examine, and I am not

disposed to believe, their distant voyages to the Persian Gulf,

or the Cape of Good Hope; but their ancestors might equal the

labors and success of the present race, and the sphere of their

navigation might extend from the Isles of Japan to the Straits of

Malacca, the pillars, if we may apply that name, of an Oriental

Hercules. ^70 Without losing sight of land, they might sail along

the coast to the extreme promontory of Achin, which is annually

visited by ten or twelve ships laden with the productions, the

manufactures, and even the artificers of China; the Island of

Sumatra and the opposite peninsula are faintly delineated ^71 as

the regions of gold and silver; and the trading cities named in

the geography of Ptolemy may indicate, that this wealth was not

solely derived from the mines.  The direct interval between

Sumatra and Ceylon is about three hundred leagues: the Chinese

and Indian navigators were conducted by the flight of birds and

periodical winds; and the ocean might be securely traversed in

square-built ships, which, instead of iron, were sewed together

with the strong thread of the cocoanut. Ceylon, Serendib, or

Taprobana, was divided between two hostile princes; one of whom

possessed the mountains, the elephants, and the luminous

carbuncle, and the other enjoyed the more solid riches of

domestic industry, foreign trade, and the capacious harbor of

Trinquemale, which received and dismissed the fleets of the East

and West. In this hospitable isle, at an equal distance (as it

was computed) from their respective countries, the silk merchants

of China, who had collected in their voyages aloes, cloves,

nutmeg, and sandal wood, maintained a free and beneficial

commerce with the inhabitants of the Persian Gulf.  The subjects

of the great king exalted, without a rival, his power and

magnificence: and the Roman, who confounded their vanity by

comparing his paltry coin with a gold medal of the emperor

Anastasius, had sailed to Ceylon, in an Aethiopian ship, as a

simple passenger. ^72

[Footnote 67: Procopius, Persic. l. i. c. 20, l. ii. c. 25;

Gothic. l. iv. c. 17.  Menander in Excerpt. Legat. p. 107.  Of

the Parthian or Persian empire, Isidore of Charax (in Stathmis

Parthicis, p. 7, 8, in Hudson, Geograph. Minor. tom. ii.) has

marked the roads, and Ammianus Marcellinus (l. xxiii. c. 6, p.

400) has enumerated the provinces.

     Note: See St. Martin, Mem. sur l'Armenie, vol. ii. p. 41. -

M.]

[Footnote 68: The blind admiration of the Jesuits confounds the

different periods of the Chinese history.  They are more

critically distinguished by M. de Guignes, (Hist. des Huns, tom.

i. part i. in the Tables, part ii. in the Geography.  Memoires de

l'Academie des Inscriptions, tom. xxxii. xxxvi. xlii. xliii.,)

who discovers the gradual progress of the truth of the annals and

the extent of the monarchy, till the Christian aera.  He has

searched, with a curious eye, the connections of the Chinese with

the nations of the West; but these connections are slight,

casual, and obscure; nor did the Romans entertain a suspicion

that the Seres or Sinae possessed an empire not inferior to their

own.

     Note: An abstract of the various opinions of the learned

modern writers, Gosselin, Mannert, Lelewel, Malte-Brun, Heeren,

and La Treille, on the Serica and the Thinae of the ancients, may

be found in the new edition of Malte-Brun, vol. vi. p. 368, 382.

- M.]

[Footnote 69: The roads from China to Persia and Hindostan may be

investigated in the relations of Hackluyt and Thevenot, the

ambassadors of Sharokh, Anthony Jenkinson, the Pere Greuber, &c.

See likewise Hanway's Travels, vol. i. p. 345 - 357.  A

communication through Thibet has been lately explored by the

English sovereigns of Bengal.]

[Footnote 70: For the Chinese navigation to Malacca and Achin,

perhaps to Ceylon, see Renaudot, (on the two Mahometan

Travellers, p. 8 - 11, 13 - 17, 141 - 157;) Dampier, (vol. ii. p.

136;) the Hist. Philosophique des deux Indes, (tom. i. p. 98,)

and Hist. Generale des Voyages, (tom. vi. p. 201.)]

[Footnote 71: The knowledge, or rather ignorance, of Strabo,

Pliny, Ptolemy, Arrian, Marcian, &c., of the countries eastward

of Cape Comorin, is finely illustrated by D'Anville, (Antiquite

Geographique de l'Inde, especially p. 161 - 198.) Our geography

of India is improved by commerce and conquest; and has been

illustrated by the excellent maps and memoirs of Major Rennel.

If he extends the sphere of his inquiries with the same critical

knowledge and sagacity, he will succeed, and may surpass, the

first of modern geographers.]

[Footnote 72: The Taprobane of Pliny, (vi. 24,) Solinus, (c. 53,)

and Salmas. Plinianae Exercitat., (p. 781, 782,) and most of the

ancients, who often confound the islands of Ceylon and Sumatra,

is more clearly described by Cosmas Indicopleustes; yet even the

Christian topographer has exaggerated its dimensions.  His

information on the Indian and Chinese trade is rare and curious,

(l. ii. p. 138, l. xi. p. 337, 338, edit. Montfaucon.)]

     As silk became of indispensable use, the emperor Justinian

saw with concern that the Persians had occupied by land and sea

the monopoly of this important supply, and that the wealth of his

subjects was continually drained by a nation of enemies and

idolaters.  An active government would have restored the trade of

Egypt and the navigation of the Red Sea, which had decayed with

the prosperity of the empire; and the Roman vessels might have

sailed, for the purchase of silk, to the ports of Ceylon, of

Malacca, or even of China.  Justinian embraced a more humble

expedient, and solicited the aid of his Christian allies, the

Aethiopians of Abyssinia, who had recently acquired the arts of

navigation, the spirit of trade, and the seaport of Adulis, ^73

^* still decorated with the trophies of a Grecian conqueror.

Along the African coast, they penetrated to the equator in search

of gold, emeralds, and aromatics; but they wisely declined an

unequal competition, in which they must be always prevented by

the vicinity of the Persians to the markets of India; and the

emperor submitted to the disappointment, till his wishes were

gratified by an unexpected event.  The gospel had been preached

to the Indians: a bishop already governed the Christians of St.

Thomas on the pepper-coast of Malabar; a church was planted in

Ceylon, and the missionaries pursued the footsteps of commerce to

the extremities of Asia. ^74 Two Persian monks had long resided

in China, perhaps in the royal city of Nankin, the seat of a

monarch addicted to foreign superstitions, and who actually

received an embassy from the Isle of Ceylon.  Amidst their pious

occupations, they viewed with a curious eye the common dress of

the Chinese, the manufactures of silk, and the myriads of

silk-worms, whose education (either on trees or in houses) had

once been considered as the labor of queens. ^75 They soon

discovered that it was impracticable to transport the short-lived

insect, but that in the eggs a numerous progeny might be

preserved and multiplied in a distant climate. Religion or

interest had more power over the Persian monks than the love of

their country: after a long journey, they arrived at

Constantinople, imparted their project to the emperor, and were

liberally encouraged by the gifts and promises of Justinian.  To

the historians of that prince, a campaign at the foot of Mount

Caucasus has seemed more deserving of a minute relation than the

labors of these missionaries of commerce, who again entered

China, deceived a jealous people by concealing the eggs of the

silk-worm in a hollow cane, and returned in triumph with the

spoils of the East.  Under their direction, the eggs were hatched

at the proper season by the artificial heat of dung; the worms

were fed with mulberry leaves; they lived and labored in a

foreign climate; a sufficient number of butterflies was saved to

propagate the race, and trees were planted to supply the

nourishment of the rising generations. Experience and reflection

corrected the errors of a new attempt, and the Sogdoite

ambassadors acknowledged, in the succeeding reign, that the

Romans were not inferior to the natives of China in the education

of the insects, and the manufactures of silk, ^76 in which both

China and Constantinople have been surpassed by the industry of

modern Europe.  I am not insensible of the benefits of elegant

luxury; yet I reflect with some pain, that if the importers of

silk had introduced the art of printing, already practised by the

Chinese, the comedies of Menander and the entire decads of Livy

would have been perpetuated in the editions of the sixth century.

A larger view of the globe might at least have promoted the

improvement of speculative science, but the Christian geography

was forcibly extracted from texts of Scripture, and the study of

nature was the surest symptom of an unbelieving mind.  The

orthodox faith confined the habitable world to one temperate

zone, and represented the earth as an oblong surface, four

hundred days' journey in length, two hundred in breadth,

encompassed by the ocean, and covered by the solid crystal of the

firmament. ^77

[Footnote 73: See Procopius, Persic. (l. ii. c. 20.) Cosmas

affords some interesting knowledge of the port and inscription of

Adulis, (Topograph. Christ. l. ii. p. 138, 140 - 143,) and of the

trade of the Axumites along the African coast of Barbaria or

Zingi, (p. 138, 139,) and as far as Taprobane, (l. xi. p. 339.)]

[Footnote *: Mr. Salt obtained information of considerable ruins

of an ancient town near Zulla, called Azoole, which answers to

the position of Adulis.  Mr. Salt was prevented by illness, Mr.

Stuart, whom he sent, by the jealousy of the natives, from

investigating these ruins: of their existence there seems no

doubt.  Salt's 2d Journey, p. 452. - M.]

[Footnote 74: See the Christian missions in India, in Cosmas, (l.

iii. p. 178, 179, l. xi. p. 337,) and consult Asseman. Bibliot.

Orient. (tom. iv. p. 413 - 548.)]

[Footnote 75: The invention, manufacture, and general use of silk

in China, may be seen in Duhalde, (Description Generale de la

Chine, tom. ii. p. 165, 205 - 223.) The province of Chekian is

the most renowned both for quantity and quality.]

[Footnote 76: Procopius, (l. viii. Gothic. iv. c. 17.  Theophanes

Byzant. apud Phot. Cod. lxxxiv. p. 38.  Zonaras, tom. ii. l. xiv.

p. 69.  Pagi (tom. ii. p. 602) assigns to the year 552 this

memorable importation.  Menander (in Excerpt. Legat. p. 107)

mentions the admiration of the Sogdoites; and Theophylact

Simocatta (l. vii. c. 9) darkly represents the two rival kingdoms

in (China) the country of silk.]

[Footnote 77: Cosmas, surnamed Indicopleustes, or the Indian

navigator, performed his voyage about the year 522, and composed

at Alexandria, between 535, and 547, Christian Topography,

(Montfaucon, Praefat. c. i.,) in which he refutes the impious

opinion, that the earth is a globe; and Photius had read this

work, (Cod. xxxvi. p. 9, 10,) which displays the prejudices of a

monk, with the knowledge of a merchant; the most valuable part

has been given in French and in Greek by Melchisedec Thevenot,

(Relations Curieuses, part i.,) and the whole is since published

in a splendid edition by Pere Montfaucon, (Nova Collectio Patrum,

Paris, 1707, 2 vols. in fol., tom. ii. p. 113 - 346.) But the

editor, a theologian, might blush at not discovering the

Nestorian heresy of Cosmas, which has been detected by La Croz

(Christianisme des Indes, tom. i. p. 40 - 56.)]

     IV.  The subjects of Justinian were dissatisfied with the

times, and with the government.  Europe was overrun by the

Barbarians, and Asia by the monks: the poverty of the West

discouraged the trade and manufactures of the East: the produce

of labor was consumed by the unprofitable servants of the church,

the state, and the army; and a rapid decrease was felt in the

fixed and circulating capitals which constitute the national

wealth.  The public distress had been alleviated by the economy

of Anastasius, and that prudent emperor accumulated an immense

treasure, while he delivered his people from the most odious or

oppressive taxes. ^* Their gratitude universally applauded the

abolition of the gold of affliction, a personal tribute on the

industry of the poor, ^78 but more intolerable, as it should

seem, in the form than in the substance, since the flourishing

city of Edessa paid only one hundred and forty pounds of gold,

which was collected in four years from ten thousand artificers.

^79 Yet such was the parsimony which supported this liberal

disposition, that, in a reign of twenty-seven years, Anastasius

saved, from his annual revenue, the enormous sum of thirteen

millions sterling, or three hundred and twenty thousand pounds of

gold. ^80 His example was neglected, and his treasure was abused,

by the nephew of Justin.  The riches of Justinian were speedily

exhausted by alms and buildings, by ambitious wars, and

ignominious treaties.  His revenues were found inadequate to his

expenses. Every art was tried to extort from the people the gold

and silver which he scattered with a lavish hand from Persia to

France: ^81 his reign was marked by the vicissitudes or rather by

the combat, of rapaciousness and avarice, of splendor and

poverty; he lived with the reputation of hidden treasures, ^82

and bequeathed to his successor the payment of his debts. ^83

Such a character has been justly accused by the voice of the

people and of posterity: but public discontent is credulous;

private malice is bold; and a lover of truth will peruse with a

suspicious eye the instructive anecdotes of Procopius.  The

secret historian represents only the vices of Justinian, and

those vices are darkened by his malevolent pencil.  Ambiguous

actions are imputed to the worst motives; error is confounded

with guilt, accident with design, and laws with abuses; the

partial injustice of a moment is dexterously applied as the

general maxim of a reign of thirty-two years; the emperor alone

is made responsible for the faults of his officers, the disorders

of the times, and the corruption of his subjects; and even the

calamities of nature, plagues, earthquakes, and inundations, are

imputed to the prince of the daemons, who had mischievously

assumed the form of Justinian. ^84

[Footnote *: See the character of Anastasius in Joannes Lydus de

Magistratibus, iii. c. 45, 46, p. 230 - 232.  His economy is

there said to have degenerated into parsimony.  He is accused of

having taken away the levying of taxes and payment of the troops

from the municipal authorities, (the decurionate) in the Eastern

cities, and intrusted it to an extortionate officer named Mannus.

But he admits that the imperial revenue was enormously increased

by this measure.  A statue of iron had been erected to Anastasius

in the Hippodrome, on which appeared one morning this pasquinade.

     This epigram is also found in the Anthology. Jacobs, vol.

iv. p. 114 with some better readings.

This iron statue meetly do we place To thee, world-wasting king,

than brass more base; For all the death, the penury, famine, woe,

That from thy wide-destroying avarice flow, This fell Charybdis,

Scylla, near to thee, This fierce devouring Anastasius, see; And

tremble, Scylla!  on thee, too, his greed, Coining thy brazen

deity, may feed.

     But Lydus, with no uncommon inconsistency in such writers,

proceeds to paint the character of Anastasius as endowed with

almost every virtue, not excepting the utmost liberality.  He was

only prevented by death from relieving his subjects altogether

from the capitation tax, which he greatly diminished. - M.]

[Footnote 78: Evagrius (l. ii. c. 39, 40) is minute and grateful,

but angry with Zosimus for calumniating the great Constantine.

In collecting all the bonds and records of the tax, the humanity

of Anastasius was diligent and artful: fathers were sometimes

compelled to prostitute their daughters, (Zosim. Hist. l. ii. c.

38, p. 165, 166, Lipsiae, 1784.) Timotheus of Gaza chose such an

event for the subject of a tragedy, (Suidas, tom. iii. p. 475,)

which contributed to the abolition of the tax, (Cedrenus, p. 35,)

- a happy instance (if it be true) of the use of the theatre.]

[Footnote 79: See Josua Stylites, in the Bibliotheca Orientalis

of Asseman, (tom. p. 268.) This capitation tax is slightly

mentioned in the Chronicle of Edessa.]

[Footnote 80: Procopius (Anecdot. c. 19) fixes this sum from the

report of the treasurers themselves.  Tiberias had vicies ter

millies; but far different was his empire from that of

Anastasius.]

[Footnote 81: Evagrius, (l. iv. c. 30,) in the next generation,

was moderate and well informed; and Zonaras, (l. xiv. c. 61,) in

the xiith century, had read with care, and thought without

prejudice; yet their colors are almost as black as those of the

anecdotes.]

[Footnote 82: Procopius (Anecdot. c. 30) relates the idle

conjectures of the times.  The death of Justinian, says the

secret historian, will expose his wealth or poverty.]

[Footnote 83: See Corippus de Laudibus Justini Aug. l. ii. 260,

&c., 384, &c

"Plurima sunt vivo nimium neglecta parenti, Unde tot exhaustus

contraxit debita fiscus."

Centenaries of gold were brought by strong men into the

Hippodrome,

"Debita persolvit, genitoris cauta recepit."]

[Footnote 84: The Anecdotes (c. 11 - 14, 18, 20 - 30) supply many

facts and more complaints.

     Note: The work of Lydus de Magistratibus (published by Hase

at Paris, 1812, and reprinted in the new edition of the Byzantine

Historians,) was written during the reign of Justinian.  This

work of Lydus throws no great light on the earlier history of the

Roman magistracy, but gives some curious details of the changes

and retrenchments in the offices of state, which took place at

this time.  The personal history of the author, with the account

of his early and rapid advancement, and the emoluments of the

posts which he successively held, with the bitter disappointment

which he expresses, at finding himself, at the height of his

ambition, in an unpaid place, is an excellent illustration of

this statement.  Gibbon has before, c. iv. n. 45, and c. xvii. n.

112, traced the progress of a Roman citizen to the highest honors

of the state under the empire; the steps by which Lydus reached

his humbler eminence may likewise throw light on the civil

service at this period. He was first received into the office of

the Praetorian praefect; became a notary in that office, and made

in one year 1000 golden solidi, and that without extortion.  His

place and the influence of his relatives obtained him a wife with

400 pounds of gold for her dowry.  He became chief chartularius,

with an annual stipend of twenty-four solidi, and considerable

emoluments for all the various services which he performed.  He

rose to an Augustalis, and finally to the dignity of Corniculus,

the highest, and at one time the most lucrative office in the

department.  But the Praetorian praefect had gradually been

deprived of his powers and his honors. He lost the

superintendence of the supply and manufacture of arms; the

uncontrolled charge of the public posts; the levying of the

troops; the command of the army in war when the emperors ceased

nominally to command in person, but really through the Praetorian

praefect; that of the household troops, which fell to the

magister aulae.  At length the office was so completely stripped

of its power, as to be virtually abolished, (see de Magist. l.

iii. c. 40, p. 220, &c.) This diminution of the office of the

praefect destroyed the emoluments of his subordinate officers,

and Lydus not only drew no revenue from his dignity, but expended

upon it all the gains of his former services.

     Lydus gravely refers this calamitous, and, as he considers

it, fatal degradation of the Praetorian office to the alteration

in the style of the official documents from Latin to Greek; and

refers to a prophecy of a certain Fonteius, which connected the

ruin of the Roman empire with its abandonment of its language.

Lydus chiefly owed his promotion to his knowledge of Latin! - M.]

     After this precaution, I shall briefly relate the anecdotes

of avarice and rapine under the following heads: I.  Justinian

was so profuse that he could not be liberal.  The civil and

military officers, when they were admitted into the service of

the palace, obtained an humble rank and a moderate stipend; they

ascended by seniority to a station of affluence and repose; the

annual pensions, of which the most honorable class was abolished

by Justinian, amounted to four hundred thousand pounds; and this

domestic economy was deplored by the venal or indigent courtiers

as the last outrage on the majesty of the empire.  The posts, the

salaries of physicians, and the nocturnal illuminations, were

objects of more general concern; and the cities might justly

complain, that he usurped the municipal revenues which had been

appropriated to these useful institutions.  Even the soldiers

were injured; and such was the decay of military spirit, that

they were injured with impunity.  The emperor refused, at the

return of each fifth year, the customary donative of five pieces

of gold, reduced his veterans to beg their bread, and suffered

unpaid armies to melt away in the wars of Italy and Persia.  II.

The humanity of his predecessors had always remitted, in some

auspicious circumstance of their reign, the arrears of the public

tribute, and they dexterously assumed the merit of resigning

those claims which it was impracticable to enforce.  "Justinian,

in the space of thirty-two years, has never granted a similar

indulgence; and many of his subjects have renounced the

possession of those lands whose value is insufficient to satisfy

the demands of the treasury.  To the cities which had suffered by

hostile inroads Anastasius promised a general exemption of seven

years: the provinces of Justinian have been ravaged by the

Persians and Arabs, the Huns and Sclavonians; but his vain and

ridiculous dispensation of a single year has been confined to

those places which were actually taken by the enemy." Such is the

language of the secret historian, who expressly denies that any

indulgence was granted to Palestine after the revolt of the

Samaritans; a false and odious charge, confuted by the authentic

record which attests a relief of thirteen centenaries of gold

(fifty-two thousand pounds) obtained for that desolate province

by the intercession of St. Sabas. ^85 III. Procopius has not

condescended to explain the system of taxation, which fell like a

hail-storm upon the land, like a devouring pestilence on its

inhabitants: but we should become the accomplices of his

malignity, if we imputed to Justinian alone the ancient though

rigorous principle, that a whole district should be condemned to

sustain the partial loss of the persons or property of

individuals.  The Annona, or supply of corn for the use of the

army and capital, was a grievous and arbitrary exaction, which

exceeded, perhaps in a tenfold proportion, the ability of the

farmer; and his distress was aggravated by the partial injustice

of weights and measures, and the expense and labor of distant

carriage.  In a time of scarcity, an extraordinary requisition

was made to the adjacent provinces of Thrace, Bithynia, and

Phrygia: but the proprietors, after a wearisome journey and

perilous navigation, received so inadequate a compensation, that

they would have chosen the alternative of delivering both the

corn and price at the doors of their granaries.  These

precautions might indicate a tender solicitude for the welfare of

the capital; yet Constantinople did not escape the rapacious

despotism of Justinian.  Till his reign, the Straits of the

Bosphorus and Hellespont were open to the freedom of trade, and

nothing was prohibited except the exportation of arms for the

service of the Barbarians. At each of these gates of the city, a

praetor was stationed, the minister of Imperial avarice; heavy

customs were imposed on the vessels and their merchandise; the

oppression was retaliated on the helpless consumer; the poor were

afflicted by the artificial scarcity, and exorbitant price of the

market; and a people, accustomed to depend on the liberality of

their prince, might sometimes complain of the deficiency of water

and bread. ^86 The aerial tribute, without a name, a law, or a

definite object, was an annual gift of one hundred and twenty

thousand pounds, which the emperor accepted from his Praetorian

praefect; and the means of payment were abandoned to the

discretion of that powerful magistrate.  IV.  Even such a tax was

less intolerable than the privilege of monopolies, ^* which

checked the fair competition of industry, and, for the sake of a

small and dishonest gain, imposed an arbitrary burden on the

wants and luxury of the subject.  "As soon" (I transcribe the

Anecdotes) "as the exclusive sale of silk was usurped by the

Imperial treasurer, a whole people, the manufacturers of Tyre and

Berytus, was reduced to extreme misery, and either perished with

hunger, or fled to the hostile dominions of Persia." A province

might suffer by the decay of its manufactures, but in this

example of silk, Procopius has partially overlooked the

inestimable and lasting benefit which the empire received from

the curiosity of Justinian.  His addition of one seventh to the

ordinary price of copper money may be interpreted with the same

candor; and the alteration, which might be wise, appears to have

been innocent; since he neither alloyed the purity, nor enhanced

the value, of the gold coin, ^87 the legal measure of public and

private payments.  V.  The ample jurisdiction required by the

farmers of the revenue to accomplish their engagements might be

placed in an odious light, as if they had purchased from the

emperor the lives and fortunes of their fellow-citizens.  And a

more direct sale of honors and offices was transacted in the

palace, with the permission, or at least with the connivance, of

Justinian and Theodora.  The claims of merit, even those of

favor, were disregarded, and it was almost reasonable to expect,

that the bold adventurer, who had undertaken the trade of a

magistrate, should find a rich compensation for infamy, labor,

danger, the debts which he had contracted, and the heavy interest

which he paid.  A sense of the disgrace and mischief of this

venal practice, at length awakened the slumbering virtue of

Justinian; and he attempted, by the sanction of oaths ^88 and

penalties, to guard the integrity of his government: but at the

end of a year of perjury, his rigorous edict was suspended, and

corruption licentiously abused her triumph over the impotence of

the laws.  VI.  The testament of Eulalius, count of the

domestics, declared the emperor his sole heir, on condition,

however, that he should discharge his debts and legacies, allow

to his three daughters a decent maintenance, and bestow each of

them in marriage, with a portion of ten pounds of gold.  But the

splendid fortune of Eulalius had been consumed by fire, and the

inventory of his goods did not exceed the trifling sum of five

hundred and sixty-four pieces of gold.  A similar instance, in

Grecian history, admonished the emperor of the honorable part

prescribed for his imitation.  He checked the selfish murmurs of

the treasury, applauded the confidence of his friend, discharged

the legacies and debts, educated the three virgins under the eye

of the empress Theodora, and doubled the marriage portion which

had satisfied the tenderness of their father. ^89 The humanity of

a prince (for princes cannot be generous) is entitled to some

praise; yet even in this act of virtue we may discover the

inveterate custom of supplanting the legal or natural heirs,

which Procopius imputes to the reign of Justinian.  His charge is

supported by eminent names and scandalous examples; neither

widows nor orphans were spared; and the art of soliciting, or

extorting, or supposing testaments, was beneficially practised by

the agents of the palace.  This base and mischievous tyranny

invades the security of private life; and the monarch who has

indulged an appetite for gain, will soon be tempted to anticipate

the moment of succession, to interpret wealth as an evidence of

guilt, and to proceed, from the claim of inheritance, to the

power of confiscation.  VII.  Among the forms of rapine, a

philosopher may be permitted to name the conversion of Pagan or

heretical riches to the use of the faithful; but in the time of

Justinian this holy plunder was condemned by the sectaries alone,

who became the victims of his orthodox avarice. ^90

[Footnote 85: One to Scythopolis, capital of the second

Palestine, and twelve for the rest of the province.  Aleman. (p.

59) honestly produces this fact from a Ms. life of St. Sabas, by

his disciple Cyril, in the Vatican Library, and since published

by Cotelerius.]

[Footnote 86: John Malala (tom. ii. p. 232) mentions the want of

bread, and Zonaras (l. xiv. p. 63) the leaden pipes, which

Justinian, or his servants, stole from the aqueducts.]

[Footnote *: Hullman (Geschichte des Byzantinischen Handels. p.

15) shows that the despotism of the government was aggravated by

the unchecked rapenity of the officers.  This state monopoly,

even of corn, wine, and oil, was to force at the time of the

first crusade. - M.]

[Footnote 87: For an aureus, one sixth of an ounce of gold,

instead of 210, he gave no more than 180 folles, or ounces of

copper.  A disproportion of the mint, below the market price,

must have soon produced a scarcity of small money.  In England

twelve pence in copper would sell for no more than seven pence,

(Smith's Inquiry into the Wealth of Nations, vol. i. p. 49.) For

Justinian's gold coin, see Evagrius, (l. iv. c. 30.)]

[Footnote 88: The oath is conceived in the most formidable words,

(Novell. viii. tit. 3.) The defaulters imprecate on themselves,

quicquid haben: telorum armamentaria coeli: the part of Judas,

the leprosy of Gieza, the tremor of Cain, &c., besides all

temporal pains.]

[Footnote 89: A similar or more generous act of friendship is

related by Lucian of Eudamidas of Corinth, (in Toxare, c. 22, 23,

tom. ii. p. 530,) and the story has produced an ingenious, though

feeble, comedy of Fontenelle.]

[Footnote 90: John Malala, tom. ii. p. 101, 102, 103.]

Chapter XL: Reign Of Justinian.

Part IV.

     Dishonor might be ultimately reflected on the character of

Justinian; but much of the guilt, and still more of the profit,

was intercepted by the ministers, who were seldom promoted for

their virtues, and not always selected for their talents. ^91 The

merits of Tribonian the quaestor will hereafter be weighed in the

reformation of the Roman law; but the economy of the East was

subordinate to the Praetorian praefect, and Procopius has

justified his anecdotes by the portrait which he exposes in his

public history, of the notorious vices of John of Cappadocia. ^92

^* His knowledge was not borrowed from the schools, ^93 and his

style was scarcely legible; but he excelled in the powers of

native genius, to suggest the wisest counsels, and to find

expedients in the most desperate situations.  The corruption of

his heart was equal to the vigor of his understanding. Although

he was suspected of magic and Pagan superstition, he appeared

insensible to the fear of God or the reproaches of man; and his

aspiring fortune was raised on the death of thousands, the

poverty of millions, the ruins of cities, and the desolation of

provinces.  From the dawn of light to the moment of dinner, he

assiduously labored to enrich his master and himself at the

expense of the Roman world; the remainder of the day was spent in

sensual and obscene pleasures, ^* and the silent hours of the

night were interrupted by the perpetual dread of the justice of

an assassin.  His abilities, perhaps his vices, recommended him

to the lasting friendship of Justinian: the emperor yielded with

reluctance to the fury of the people; his victory was displayed

by the immediate restoration of their enemy; and they felt above

ten years, under his oppressive administration, that he was

stimulated by revenge, rather than instructed by misfortune.

Their murmurs served only to fortify the resolution of Justinian;

but the resentment of Theodora, disdained a power before which

every knee was bent, and attempted to sow the seeds of discord

between the emperor and his beloved consort. Even Theodora

herself was constrained to dissemble, to wait a favorable moment,

and, by an artful conspiracy, to render John of Coppadocia the

accomplice of his own destruction. ^! At a time when Belisarius,

unless he had been a hero, must have shown himself a rebel, his

wife Antonina, who enjoyed the secret confidence of the empress,

communicated his feigned discontent to Euphemia, the daughter of

the praefect; the credulous virgin imparted to her father the

dangerous project, and John, who might have known the value of

oaths and promises, was tempted to accept a nocturnal, and almost

treasonable, interview with the wife of Belisarius.  An ambuscade

of guards and eunuchs had been posted by the command of Theodora;

they rushed with drawn swords to seize or to punish the guilty

minister: he was saved by the fidelity of his attendants; but

instead of appealing to a gracious sovereign, who had privately

warned him of his danger, he pusillanimously fled to the

sanctuary of the church.  The favorite of Justinian was

sacrificed to conjugal tenderness or domestic tranquility; the

conversion of a praefect into a priest extinguished his ambitious

hopes: but the friendship of the emperor alleviated his disgrace,

and he retained in the mild exile of Cyzicus an ample portion of

his riches.  Such imperfect revenge could not satisfy the

unrelenting hatred of Theodora; the murder of his old enemy, the

bishop of Cyzicus, afforded a decent pretence; and John of

Cappadocia, whose actions had deserved a thousand deaths, was at

last condemned for a crime of which he was innocent.  A great

minister, who had been invested with the honors of consul and

patrician, was ignominiously scourged like the vilest of

malefactors; a tattered cloak was the sole remnant of his

fortunes; he was transported in a bark to the place of his

banishment at Antinopolis in Upper Egypt, and the praefect of the

East begged his bread through the cities which had trembled at

his name.  During an exile of seven years, his life was

protracted and threatened by the ingenious cruelty of Theodora;

and when her death permitted the emperor to recall a servant whom

he had abandoned with regret, the ambition of John of Cappadocia

was reduced to the humble duties of the sacerdotal profession.

His successors convinced the subjects of Justinian, that the arts

of oppression might still be improved by experience and industry;

the frauds of a Syrian banker were introduced into the

administration of the finances; and the example of the praefect

was diligently copied by the quaestor, the public and private

treasurer, the governors of provinces, and the principal

magistrates of the Eastern empire. ^94

[Footnote 91: One of these, Anatolius, perished in an earthquake

- doubtless a judgment!  The complaints and clamors of the people

in Agathias (l. v. p. 146, 147) are almost an echo of the

anecdote.  The aliena pecunia reddenda of Corippus (l. ii. 381,

&c.,) is not very honorable to Justinian's memory.]

[Footnote 92: See the history and character of John of Cappadocia

in Procopius.  (Persic, l. i. c. 35, 25, l. ii. c. 30.  Vandal.

l. i. c. 13. Anecdot. c. 2, 17, 22.) The agreement of the history

and anecdotes is a mortal wound to the reputation of the

praefct.]

[Footnote *: This view, particularly of the cruelty of John of

Cappadocia, is confirmed by the testimony of Joannes Lydus, who

was in the office of the praefect, and eye-witness of the

tortures inflicted by his command on the miserable debtors, or

supposed debtors, of the state.  He mentions one horrible

instance of a respectable old man, with whom he was personally

acquainted, who, being suspected of possessing money, was hung up

by the hands till he was dead.  Lydus de Magist. lib. iii. c. 57,

p. 254. - M.]

[Footnote 93: A forcible expression.]

[Footnote *: Joannes Lydus is diffuse on this subject, lib. iii.

c. 65, p. 268.  But the indignant virtue of Lydus seems greatly

stimulated by the loss of his official fees, which he ascribes to

the innovations of the minister. - M.]

[Footnote !: According to Lydus, Theodora disclosed the crimes

and unpopularity of the minister to Justinian, but the emperor

had not the courage to remove, and was unable to replace, a

servant, under whom his finances seemed to prosper.  He

attributes the sedition and conflagration to the popular

resentment against the tyranny of John, lib. iii. c 70, p. 278.

Unfortunately there is a large gap in his work just at this

period. - M.]

[Footnote 94: The chronology of Procopius is loose and obscure;

but with the aid of Pagi I can discern that John was appointed

Praetorian praefect of the East in the year 530 - that he was

removed in January, 532 - restored before June, 533 - banished in

541 - and recalled between June, 548, and April 1, 549.  Aleman.

(p. 96, 97) gives the list of his ten successors - a rapid series

in a part of a single reign.

     Note: Lydus gives a high character of Phocas, his successor

tom. iii. c. 78 p. 288. - M.]

     V.  The edifices of Justinian were cemented with the blood

and treasure of his people; but those stately structures appeared

to announce the prosperity of the empire, and actually displayed

the skill of their architects.  Both the theory and practice of

the arts which depend on mathematical science and mechanical

power, were cultivated under the patronage of the emperors; the

fame of Archimedes was rivalled by Proclus and Anthemius; and if

their miracles had been related by intelligent spectators, they

might now enlarge the speculations, instead of exciting the

distrust, of philosophers.  A tradition has prevailed, that the

Roman fleet was reduced to ashes in the port of Syracuse, by the

burning-glasses of Archimedes; ^95 and it is asserted, that a

similar expedient was employed by Proclus to destroy the Gothic

vessels in the harbor of Constantinople, and to protect his

benefactor Anastasius against the bold enterprise of Vitalian.

^96 A machine was fixed on the walls of the city, consisting of a

hexagon mirror of polished brass, with many smaller and movable

polygons to receive and reflect the rays of the meridian sun; and

a consuming flame was darted, to the distance, perhaps of two

hundred feet. ^97 The truth of these two extraordinary facts is

invalidated by the silence of the most authentic historians; and

the use of burning-glasses was never adopted in the attack or

defence of places. ^98 Yet the admirable experiments of a French

philosopher ^99 have demonstrated the possibility of such a

mirror; and, since it is possible, I am more disposed to

attribute the art to the greatest mathematicians of antiquity,

than to give the merit of the fiction to the idle fancy of a monk

or a sophist.  According to another story, Proclus applied

sulphur to the destruction of the Gothic fleet; ^100 in a modern

imagination, the name of sulphur is instantly connected with the

suspicion of gunpowder, and that suspicion is propagated by the

secret arts of his disciple Anthemius. ^101 A citizen of Tralles

in Asia had five sons, who were all distinguished in their

respective professions by merit and success. Olympius excelled in

the knowledge and practice of the Roman jurisprudence. Dioscorus

and Alexander became learned physicians; but the skill of the

former was exercised for the benefit of his fellow-citizens,

while his more ambitious brother acquired wealth and reputation

at Rome.  The fame of Metrodorus the grammarian, and of Anthemius

the mathematician and architect, reached the ears of the emperor

Justinian, who invited them to Constantinople; and while the one

instructed the rising generation in the schools of eloquence, the

other filled the capital and provinces with more lasting

monuments of his art.  In a trifling dispute relative to the

walls or windows of their contiguous houses, he had been

vanquished by the eloquence of his neighbor Zeno; but the orator

was defeated in his turn by the master of mechanics, whose

malicious, though harmless, stratagems are darkly represented by

the ignorance of Agathias.  In a lower room, Anthemius arranged

several vessels or caldrons of water, each of them covered by the

wide bottom of a leathern tube, which rose to a narrow top, and

was artificially conveyed among the joists and rafters of the

adjacent building. A fire was kindled beneath the caldron; the

steam of the boiling water ascended through the tubes; the house

was shaken by the efforts of imprisoned air, and its trembling

inhabitants might wonder that the city was unconscious of the

earthquake which they had felt.  At another time, the friends of

Zeno, as they sat at table, were dazzled by the intolerable light

which flashed in their eyes from the reflecting mirrors of

Anthemius; they were astonished by the noise which he produced

from the collision of certain minute and sonorous particles; and

the orator declared in tragic style to the senate, that a mere

mortal must yield to the power of an antagonist, who shook the

earth with the trident of Neptune, and imitated the thunder and

lightning of Jove himself. The genius of Anthemius, and his

colleague Isidore the Milesian, was excited and employed by a

prince, whose taste for architecture had degenerated into a

mischievous and costly passion.  His favorite architects

submitted their designs and difficulties to Justinian, and

discreetly confessed how much their laborious meditations were

surpassed by the intuitive knowledge of celestial inspiration of

an emperor, whose views were always directed to the benefit of

his people, the glory of his reign, and the salvation of his

soul. ^102

[Footnote 95: This conflagration is hinted by Lucian (in Hippia,

c. 2) and Galen, (l. iii. de Temperamentis, tom. i. p. 81, edit.

Basil.) in the second century.  A thousand years afterwards, it

is positively affirmed by Zonaras, (l. ix. p. 424,) on the faith

of Dion Cassius, Tzetzes, (Chiliad ii. 119, &c.,) Eustathius, (ad

Iliad. E. p. 338,) and the scholiast of Lucian.  See Fabricius,

(Bibliot. Graec. l. iii. c. 22, tom. ii. p. 551, 552,) to whom I

am more or less indebted for several of these quotations.]

[Footnote 96: Zonaras (l. xi. c. p. 55) affirms the fact, without

quoting any evidence.]

[Footnote 97: Tzetzes describes the artifice of these

burning-glasses, which he had read, perhaps, with no learned

eyes, in a mathematical treatise of Anthemius.  That treatise has

been lately published, translated, and illustrated, by M. Dupuys,

a scholar and a mathematician, (Memoires de l'Academie des

Inscriptions, tom xlii p. 392 - 451.)]

[Footnote 98: In the siege of Syracuse, by the silence of

Polybius, Plutarch, Livy; in the siege of Constantinople, by that

of Marcellinus and all the contemporaries of the vith century.]

[Footnote 99: Without any previous knowledge of Tzetzes or

Anthemius, the immortal Buffon imagined and executed a set of

burning-glasses, with which he could inflame planks at the

distance of 200 feet, (Supplement a l'Hist. Naturelle, tom. i.

399 - 483, quarto edition.) What miracles would not his genius

have performed for the public service, with royal expense, and in

the strong sun of Constantinople or Syracuse?]

[Footnote 100: John Malala (tom. ii. p. 120 - 124) relates the

fact; but he seems to confound the names or persons of Proclus

and Marinus.]

[Footnote 101: Agathias, l. v. p. 149 - 152.  The merit of

Anthemius as an architect is loudly praised by Procopius (de

Edif. l. i. c. 1) and Paulus Silentiarius, (part i. 134, &c.)]

[Footnote 102: See Procopius, (de Edificiis, l. i. c. 1, 2, l.

ii. c. 3.) He relates a coincidence of dreams, which supposes

some fraud in Justinian or his architect.  They both saw, in a

vision, the same plan for stopping an inundation at Dara.  A

stone quarry near Jerusalem was revealed to the emperor, (l. v.

c. 6:) an angel was tricked into the perpetual custody of St.

Sophia, (Anonym. de Antiq. C. P. l. iv. p. 70.)]

     The principal church, which was dedicated by the founder of

Constantinople to St. Sophia, or the eternal wisdom, had been

twice destroyed by fire; after the exile of John Chrysostom, and

during the Nika of the blue and green factions.  No sooner did

the tumult subside, than the Christian populace deplored their

sacrilegious rashness; but they might have rejoiced in the

calamity, had they foreseen the glory of the new temple, which at

the end of forty days was strenuously undertaken by the piety of

Justinian. ^103 The ruins were cleared away, a more spacious plan

was described, and as it required the consent of some proprietors

of ground, they obtained the most exorbitant terms from the eager

desires and timorous conscience of the monarch.  Anthemius formed

the design, and his genius directed the hands of ten thousand

workmen, whose payment in pieces of fine silver was never delayed

beyond the evening.  The emperor himself, clad in a linen tunic,

surveyed each day their rapid progress, and encouraged their

diligence by his familiarity, his zeal, and his rewards.  The new

Cathedral of St. Sophia was consecrated by the patriarch, five

years, eleven months, and ten days from the first foundation; and

in the midst of the solemn festival Justinian exclaimed with

devout vanity, "Glory be to God, who hath thought me worthy to

accomplish so great a work; I have vanquished thee, O Solomon!"

^104 But the pride of the Roman Solomon, before twenty years had

elapsed, was humbled by an earthquake, which overthrew the

eastern part of the dome.  Its splendor was again restored by the

perseverance of the same prince; and in the thirty- sixth year of

his reign, Justinian celebrated the second dedication of a temple

which remains, after twelve centuries, a stately monument of his

fame. The architecture of St. Sophia, which is now converted into

the principal mosch, has been imitated by the Turkish sultans,

and that venerable pile continues to excite the fond admiration

of the Greeks, and the more rational curiosity of European

travellers.  The eye of the spectator is disappointed by an

irregular prospect of half-domes and shelving roofs: the western

front, the principal approach, is destitute of simplicity and

magnificence; and the scale of dimensions has been much surpassed

by several of the Latin cathedrals.  But the architect who first

erected and aerial cupola, is entitled to the praise of bold

design and skilful execution.  The dome of St. Sophia,

illuminated by four-and-twenty windows, is formed with so small a

curve, that the depth is equal only to one sixth of its diameter;

the measure of that diameter is one hundred and fifteen feet, and

the lofty centre, where a crescent has supplanted the cross,

rises to the perpendicular height of one hundred and eighty feet

above the pavement. The circle which encompasses the dome,

lightly reposes on four strong arches, and their weight is firmly

supported by four massy piles, whose strength is assisted, on the

northern and southern sides, by four columns of Egyptian granite.

A Greek cross, inscribed in a quadrangle, represents the form of

the edifice; the exact breadth is two hundred and forty-three

feet, and two hundred and sixty-nine may be assigned for the

extreme length from the sanctuary in the east, to the nine

western doors, which open into the vestibule, and from thence

into the narthex or exterior portico.  That portico was the

humble station of the penitents.  The nave or body of the church

was filled by the congregation of the faithful; but the two sexes

were prudently distinguished, and the upper and lower galleries

were allotted for the more private devotion of the women. Beyond

the northern and southern piles, a balustrade, terminated on

either side by the thrones of the emperor and the patriarch,

divided the nave from the choir; and the space, as far as the

steps of the altar, was occupied by the clergy and singers.  The

altar itself, a name which insensibly became familiar to

Christian ears, was placed in the eastern recess, artificially

built in the form of a demi-cylinder; and this sanctuary

communicated by several doors with the sacristy, the vestry, the

baptistery, and the contiguous buildings, subservient either to

the pomp of worship, or the private use of the ecclesiastical

ministers.  The memory of past calamities inspired Justinian with

a wise resolution, that no wood, except for the doors, should be

admitted into the new edifice; and the choice of the materials

was applied to the strength, the lightness, or the splendor of

the respective parts.  The solid piles which contained the cupola

were composed of huge blocks of freestone, hewn into squares and

triangles, fortified by circles of iron, and firmly cemented by

the infusion of lead and quicklime: but the weight of the cupola

was diminished by the levity of its substance, which consists

either of pumice-stone that floats in the water, or of bricks

from the Isle of Rhodes, five times less ponderous than the

ordinary sort. The whole frame of the edifice was constructed of

brick; but those base materials were concealed by a crust of

marble; and the inside of St. Sophia, the cupola, the two larger,

and the six smaller, semi-domes, the walls, the hundred columns,

and the pavement, delight even the eyes of Barbarians, with a

rich and variegated picture.  A poet, ^105 who beheld the

primitive lustre of St. Sophia, enumerates the colors, the

shades, and the spots of ten or twelve marbles, jaspers, and

porphyries, which nature had profusely diversified, and which

were blended and contrasted as it were by a skilful painter.  The

triumph of Christ was adorned with the last spoils of Paganism,

but the greater part of these costly stones was extracted from

the quarries of Asia Minor, the isles and continent of Greece,

Egypt, Africa, and Gaul. Eight columns of porphyry, which

Aurelian had placed in the temple of the sun, were offered by the

piety of a Roman matron; eight others of green marble were

presented by the ambitious zeal of the magistrates of Ephesus:

both are admirable by their size and beauty, but every order of

architecture disclaims their fantastic capital.  A variety of

ornaments and figures was curiously expressed in mosaic; and the

images of Christ, of the Virgin, of saints, and of angels, which

have been defaced by Turkish fanaticism, were dangerously exposed

to the superstition of the Greeks.  According to the sanctity of

each object, the precious metals were distributed in thin leaves

or in solid masses.  The balustrade of the choir, the capitals of

the pillars, the ornaments of the doors and galleries, were of

gilt bronze; the spectator was dazzled by the glittering aspect

of the cupola; the sanctuary contained forty thousand pounds

weight of silver; and the holy vases and vestments of the altar

were of the purest gold, enriched with inestimable gems.  Before

the structure of the church had arisen two cubits above the

ground, forty-five thousand two hundred pounds were already

consumed; and the whole expense amounted to three hundred and

twenty thousand: each reader, according to the measure of his

belief, may estimate their value either in gold or silver; but

the sum of one million sterling is the result of the lowest

computation.  A magnificent temple is a laudable monument of

national taste and religion; and the enthusiast who entered the

dome of St. Sophia might be tempted to suppose that it was the

residence, or even the workmanship, of the Deity.  Yet how dull

is the artifice, how insignificant is the labor, if it be

compared with the formation of the vilest insect that crawls upon

the surface of the temple!

[Footnote 103: Among the crowd of ancients and moderns who have

celebrated the edifice of St. Sophia, I shall distinguish and

follow, 1. Four original spectators and historians: Procopius,

(de Edific. l. i. c. 1,) Agathias, (l. v. p. 152, 153,) Paul

Silentiarius, (in a poem of 1026 hexameters, and calcem Annae

Commen. Alexiad.,) and Evagrius, (l. iv. c. 31.) 2. Two legendary

Greeks of a later period: George Codinus, (de Origin. C. P. p. 64

- 74,) and the anonymous writer of Banduri, (Imp. Orient. tom. i.

l. iv. p. 65 - 80.)3. The great Byzantine antiquarian.  Ducange,

(Comment. ad Paul Silentiar. p. 525 - 598, and C. P. Christ. l.

iii. p. 5 - 78.) 4. Two French travellers - the one, Peter

Gyllius, (de Topograph. C. P. l. ii. c. 3, 4,) in the xvith; the

other, Grelot, (Voyage de C. P. p. 95 - 164, Paris, 1680, in

4to:) he has given plans, prospects, and inside views of St.

Sophia; and his plans, though on a smaller scale, appear more

correct than those of Ducange.  I have adopted and reduced the

measures of Grelot: but as no Christian can now ascend the dome,

the height is borrowed from Evagrius, compared with Gyllius,

Greaves, and the Oriental Geographer.]

[Footnote 104: Solomon's temple was surrounded with courts,

porticos, &c.; but the proper structure of the house of God was

no more (if we take the Egyptian or Hebrew cubic at 22 inches)

than 55 feet in height, 36 2/3 in breadth, and 110 in length - a

small parish church, says Prideaux, (Connection, vol. i. p. 144,

folio;) but few sanctuaries could be valued at four or five

millions sterling!

     Note *: Hist of Jews, vol i p 257. - M]

[Footnote 105: Paul Silentiarius, in dark and poetic language,

describes the various stones and marbles that were employed in

the edifice of St. Sophia, (P. ii. p. 129, 133, &c., &c.:)

1. The Carystian - pale, with iron veins.

2. The Phrygian - of two sorts, both of a rosy hue; the one with

a white shade, the other purple, with silver flowers.

3. The Porphyry of Egypt - with small stars.

4. The green marble of Laconia.

5. The Carian - from Mount Iassis, with oblique veins, white and

red.

6. The Lydian - pale, with a red flower.

7. The African, or Mauritanian - of a gold or saffron hue.

8. The Celtic - black, with white veins.

9. The Bosphoric - white, with black edges. Besides the

Proconnesian which formed the pavement; the Thessalian,

Molossian, &c., which are less distinctly painted.]

     So minute a description of an edifice which time has

respected, may attest the truth, and excuse the relation, of the

innumerable works, both in the capital and provinces, which

Justinian constructed on a smaller scale and less durable

foundations. ^106 In Constantinople alone and the adjacent

suburbs, he dedicated twenty-five churches to the honor of

Christ, the Virgin, and the saints: most of these churches were

decorated with marble and gold; and their various situation was

skilfully chosen in a populous square, or a pleasant grove; on

the margin of the sea-shore, or on some lofty eminence which

overlooked the continents of Europe and Asia.  The church of the

Holy Apostles at Constantinople, and that of St. John at Ephesus,

appear to have been framed on the same model: their domes aspired

to imitate the cupolas of St. Sophia; but the altar was more

judiciously placed under the centre of the dome, at the junction

of four stately porticos, which more accurately expressed the

figure of the Greek cross.  The Virgin of Jerusalem might exult

in the temple erected by her Imperial votary on a most ungrateful

spot, which afforded neither ground nor materials to the

architect.  A level was formed by raising part of a deep valley

to the height of the mountain. The stones of a neighboring quarry

were hewn into regular forms; each block was fixed on a peculiar

carriage, drawn by forty of the strongest oxen, and the roads

were widened for the passage of such enormous weights.  Lebanon

furnished her loftiest cedars for the timbers of the church; and

the seasonable discovery of a vein of red marble supplied its

beautiful columns, two of which, the supporters of the exterior

portico, were esteemed the largest in the world. The pious

munificence of the emperor was diffused over the Holy Land; and

if reason should condemn the monasteries of both sexes which were

built or restored by Justinian, yet charity must applaud the

wells which he sunk, and the hospitals which he founded, for the

relief of the weary pilgrims.  The schismatical temper of Egypt

was ill entitled to the royal bounty; but in Syria and Africa,

some remedies were applied to the disasters of wars and

earthquakes, and both Carthage and Antioch, emerging from their

ruins, might revere the name of their gracious benefactor. ^107

Almost every saint in the calendar acquired the honors of a

temple; almost every city of the empire obtained the solid

advantages of bridges, hospitals, and aqueducts; but the severe

liberality of the monarch disdained to indulge his subjects in

the popular luxury of baths and theatres.  While Justinian

labored for the public service, he was not unmindful of his own

dignity and ease.  The Byzantine palace, which had been damaged

by the conflagration, was restored with new magnificence; and

some notion may be conceived of the whole edifice, by the

vestibule or hall, which, from the doors perhaps, or the roof,

was surnamed chalce, or the brazen.  The dome of a spacious

quadrangle was supported by massy pillars; the pavement and walls

were incrusted with many-colored marbles - the emerald green of

Laconia, the fiery red, and the white Phrygian stone, intersected

with veins of a sea-green hue: the mosaic paintings of the dome

and sides represented the glories of the African and Italian

triumphs.  On the Asiatic shore of the Propontis, at a small

distance to the east of Chalcedon, the costly palace and gardens

of Heraeum ^108 were prepared for the summer residence of

Justinian, and more especially of Theodora.  The poets of the age

have celebrated the rare alliance of nature and art, the harmony

of the nymphs of the groves, the fountains, and the waves: yet

the crowd of attendants who followed the court complained of

their inconvenient lodgings, ^109 and the nymphs were too often

alarmed by the famous Porphyrio, a whale of ten cubits in

breadth, and thirty in length, who was stranded at the mouth of

the River Sangaris, after he had infested more than half a

century the seas of Constantinople. ^110

[Footnote 106: The six books of the Edifices of Procopius are

thus distributed the first is confined to Constantinople: the

second includes Mesopotamia and Syria the third, Armenia and the

Euxine; the fourth, Europe; the fifth, Asia Minor and Palestine;

the sixth, Egypt and Africa. Italy is forgot by the emperor or

the historian, who published this work of adulation before the

date (A.D. 555) of its final conquest.]

[Footnote 107: Justinian once gave forty-five centenaries of gold

(180,000l for the repairs of Antioch after the earthquake, (John

Malala, tom. ii p 146 - 149.)]

[Footnote 108: For the Heraeum, the palace of Theodora, see

Gyllius, (de Bosphoro Thracio, l. iii. c. xi.,) Aleman.  (Not.

ad. Anec. p. 80, 81, who quotes several epigrams of the

Anthology,) and Ducange, (C. P. Christ. l. iv. c. 13, p. 175,

176.)]

[Footnote 109: Compare, in the Edifices, (l. i. c. 11,) and in

the Anecdotes, (c. 8, 15.) the different styles of adulation and

malevolence: stripped of the paint, or cleansed from the dirt,

the object appears to be the same.]

[Footnote 110: Procopius, l. viii. 29; most probably a stranger

and wanderer, as the Mediterranean does not breed whales.

Balaenae quoque in nostra maria penetrant, (Plin. Hist. Natur.

ix. 2.) Between the polar circle and the tropic, the cetaceous

animals of the ocean grow to the length of 50, 80, or 100 feet,

(Hist. des Voyages, tom. xv. p. 289.  Pennant's British Zoology,

vol. iii. p. 35.)]

     The fortifications of Europe and Asia were multiplied by

Justinian; but the repetition of those timid and fruitless

precautions exposes, to a philosophic eye, the debility of the

empire. ^111 From Belgrade to the Euxine, from the conflux of the

Save to the mouth of the Danube, a chain of above fourscore

fortified places was extended along the banks of the great river.

Single watch-towers were changed into spacious citadels; vacant

walls, which the engineers contracted or enlarged according to

the nature of the ground, were filled with colonies or garrisons;

a strong fortress defended the ruins of Trajan's bridge, ^112 and

several military stations affected to spread beyond the Danube

the pride of the Roman name.  But that name was divested of its

terrors; the Barbarians, in their annual inroads, passed, and

contemptuously repassed, before these useless bulwarks; and the

inhabitants of the frontier, instead of reposing under the shadow

of the general defence, were compelled to guard, with incessant

vigilance, their separate habitations. The solitude of ancient

cities, was replenished; the new foundations of Justinian

acquired, perhaps too hastily, the epithets of impregnable and

populous; and the auspicious place of his own nativity attracted

the grateful reverence of the vainest of princes.  Under the name

of Justiniana prima, the obscure village of Tauresium became the

seat of an archbishop and a praefect, whose jurisdiction extended

over seven warlike provinces of Illyricum; ^113 and the corrupt

apellation of Giustendil still indicates, about twenty miles to

the south of Sophia, the residence of a Turkish sanjak. ^114 For

the use of the emperor's countryman, a cathedral, a place, and an

aqueduct, were speedily constructed; the public and private

edifices were adapted to the greatness of a royal city; and the

strength of the walls resisted, during the lifetime of Justinian,

the unskilful assaults of the Huns and Sclavonians.  Their

progress was sometimes retarded, and their hopes of rapine were

disappointed, by the innumerable castles which, in the provinces

of Dacia, Epirus, Thessaly, Macedonia, and Thrace, appeared to

cover the whole face of the country.  Six hundred of these forts

were built or repaired by the emperor; but it seems reasonable to

believe, that the far greater part consisted only of a stone or

brick tower, in the midst of a square or circular area, which was

surrounded by a wall and ditch, and afforded in a moment of

danger some protection to the peasants and cattle of the

neighboring villages. ^115 Yet these military works, which

exhausted the public treasure, could not remove the just

apprehensions of Justinian and his European subjects.  The warm

baths of Anchialus in Thrace were rendered as safe as they were

salutary; but the rich pastures of Thessalonica were foraged by

the Scythian cavalry; the delicious vale of Tempe, three hundred

miles from the Danube, was continually alarmed by the sound of

war; ^116 and no unfortified spot, however distant or solitary,

could securely enjoy the blessings of peace.  The Straits of

Thermopylae, which seemed to protect, but which had so often

betrayed, the safety of Greece, were diligently strengthened by

the labors of Justinian.  From the edge of the sea-shore, through

the forests and valleys, and as far as the summit of the

Thessalian mountains, a strong wall was continued, which occupied

every practicable entrance.  Instead of a hasty crowd of

peasants, a garrison of two thousand soldiers was stationed along

the rampart; granaries of corn and reservoirs of water were

provided for their use; and by a precaution that inspired the

cowardice which it foresaw, convenient fortresses were erected

for their retreat.  The walls of Corinth, overthrown by an

earthquake, and the mouldering bulwarks of Athens and Plataea,

were carefully restored; the Barbarians were discouraged by the

prospect of successive and painful sieges: and the naked cities

of Peloponnesus were covered by the fortifications of the Isthmus

of Corinth.  At the extremity of Europe, another peninsula, the

Thracian Chersonesus, runs three days' journey into the sea, to

form, with the adjacent shores of Asia, the Straits of the

Hellespont.  The intervals between eleven populous towns were

filled by lofty woods, fair pastures, and arable lands; and the

isthmus, of thirty seven stadia or furlongs, had been fortified

by a Spartan general nine hundred years before the reign of

Justinian. ^117 In an age of freedom and valor, the slightest

rampart may prevent a surprise; and Procopius appears insensible

of the superiority of ancient times, while he praises the solid

construction and double parapet of a wall, whose long arms

stretched on either side into the sea; but whose strength was

deemed insufficient to guard the Chersonesus, if each city, and

particularly Gallipoli and Sestus, had not been secured by their

peculiar fortifications.  The long wall, as it was emphatically

styled, was a work as disgraceful in the object, as it was

respectable in the execution.  The riches of a capital diffuse

themselves over the neighboring country, and the territory of

Constantinople a paradise of nature, was adorned with the

luxurious gardens and villas of the senators and opulent

citizens. But their wealth served only to attract the bold and

rapacious Barbarians; the noblest of the Romans, in the bosom of

peaceful indolence, were led away into Scythian captivity, and

their sovereign might view from his palace the hostile flames

which were insolently spread to the gates of the Imperial city.

At the distance only of forty miles, Anastasius was constrained

to establish a last frontier; his long wall, of sixty miles from

the Propontis to the Euxine, proclaimed the impotence of his

arms; and as the danger became more imminent, new fortifications

were added by the indefatigable prudence of Justinian. ^118

[Footnote 111: Montesquieu observes, (tom. iii. p. 503,

Considerations sur la Grandeur et la Decadence des Romains, c.

xx.,) that Justinian's empire was like France in the time of the

Norman inroads - never so weak as when every village was

fortified.]

[Footnote 112: Procopius affirms (l. iv. c. 6) that the Danube

was stopped by the ruins of the bridge.  Had Apollodorus, the

architect, left a description of his own work, the fabulous

wonders of Dion Cassius (l lxviii. p. 1129) would have been

corrected by the genuine picture Trajan's bridge consisted of

twenty or twenty-two stone piles with wooden arches; the river is

shallow, the current gentle, and the whole interval no more than

443 (Reimer ad Dion. from Marsigli) or 5l7 toises, (D'Anville,

Geographie Ancienne, tom. i. p. 305.)]

[Footnote 113: Of the two Dacias, Mediterranea and Ripensis,

Dardania, Pravalitana, the second Maesia, and the second

Macedonia.  See Justinian (Novell. xi.,) who speaks of his

castles beyond the Danube, and on omines semper bellicis

sudoribus inhaerentes.]

[Footnote 114: See D'Anville, (Memoires de l'Academie, &c., tom.

xxxi p. 280, 299,) Rycaut, (Present State of the Turkish Empire,

p. 97, 316,) Max sigli, (Stato Militare del Imperio Ottomano, p.

130.) The sanjak of Giustendil is one of the twenty under the

beglerbeg of Rurselis, and his district maintains 48 zaims and

588 timariots.]

[Footnote 115: These fortifications may be compared to the

castles in Mingrelia (Chardin, Voyages en Perse, tom. i. p. 60,

131) - a natural picture.]

[Footnote 116: The valley of Tempe is situate along the River

Peneus, between the hills of Ossa and Olympus: it is only five

miles long, and in some places no more than 120 feet in breadth.

Its verdant beauties are elegantly described by Pliny, (Hist.

Natur. l. iv. 15,) and more diffusely by Aelian, (Hist. Var. l.

iii. c. i.)]

[Footnote 117: Xenophon Hellenic. l. iii. c. 2.  After a long and

tedious conversation with the Byzantine declaimers, how

refreshing is the truth, the simplicity, the elegance of an Attic

writer!]

[Footnote 118: See the long wall in Evagarius, (l. iv. c. 38.)

This whole article is drawn from the fourth book of the Edifices,

except Anchialus, (l. iii. c. 7.)]

     Asia Minor, after the submission of the Isaurians, ^119

remained without enemies and without fortifications.  Those bold

savages, who had disdained to be the subjects of Gallienus,

persisted two hundred and thirty years in a life of independence

and rapine.  The most successful princes respected the strength

of the mountains and the despair of the natives; their fierce

spirit was sometimes soothed with gifts, and sometimes restrained

by terror; and a military count, with three legions, fixed his

permanent and ignominious station in the heart of the Roman

provinces. ^120 But no sooner was the vigilance of power relaxed

or diverted, than the light-armed squadrons descended from the

hills, and invaded the peaceful plenty of Asia.  Although the

Isaurians were not remarkable for stature or bravery, want

rendered them bold, and experience made them skilful in the

exercise of predatory war. They advanced with secrecy and speed

to the attack of villages and defenceless towns; their flying

parties have sometimes touched the Hellespont, the Euxine, and

the gates of Tarsus, Antioch, or Damascus; ^121 and the spoil was

lodged in their inaccessible mountains, before the Roman troops

had received their orders, or the distant province had computed

its loss.  The guilt of rebellion and robbery excluded them from

the rights of national enemies; and the magistrates were

instructed, by an edict, that the trial or punishment of an

Isaurian, even on the festival of Easter, was a meritorious act

of justice and piety. ^122 If the captives were condemned to

domestic slavery, they maintained, with their sword or dagger,

the private quarrel of their masters; and it was found expedient

for the public tranquillity to prohibit the service of such

dangerous retainers.  When their countryman Tarcalissaeus or Zeno

ascended the throne, he invited a faithful and formidable band of

Isaurians, who insulted the court and city, and were rewarded by

an annual tribute of five thousand pounds of gold.  But the hopes

of fortune depopulated the mountains, luxury enervated the

hardiness of their minds and bodies, and in proportion as they

mixed with mankind, they became less qualified for the enjoyment

of poor and solitary freedom.  After the death of Zeno, his

successor Anastasius suppressed their pensions, exposed their

persons to the revenge of the people, banished them from

Constantinople, and prepared to sustain a war, which left only

the alternative of victory or servitude.  A brother of the last

emperor usurped the title of Augustus; his cause was powerfully

supported by the arms, the treasures, and the magazines,

collected by Zeno; and the native Isaurians must have formed the

smallest portion of the hundred and fifty thousand Barbarians

under his standard, which was sanctified, for the first time, by

the presence of a fighting bishop.  Their disorderly numbers were

vanquished in the plains of Phrygia by the valor and discipline

of the Goths; but a war of six years almost exhausted the courage

of the emperor. ^123 The Isaurians retired to their mountains;

their fortresses were successively besieged and ruined; their

communication with the sea was intercepted; the bravest of their

leaders died in arms; the surviving chiefs, before their

execution, were dragged in chains through the hippodrome; a

colony of their youth was transplanted into Thrace, and the

remnant of the people submitted to the Roman government.  Yet

some generations elapsed before their minds were reduced to the

level of slavery.  The populous villages of Mount Taurus were

filled with horsemen and archers: they resisted the imposition of

tributes, but they recruited the armies of Justinian; and his

civil magistrates, the proconsul of Cappadocia, the count of

Isauria, and the praetors of Lycaonia and Pisidia, were invested

with military power to restrain the licentious practice of rapes

and assassinations. ^124

[Footnote 119: Turn back to vol. i. p. 328.  In the course of

this History, I have sometimes mentioned, and much oftener

slighted, the hasty inroads of the Isaurians, which were not

attended with any consequences.]

[Footnote 120: Trebellius Pollio in Hist. August. p. 107, who

lived under Diocletian, or Constantine.  See likewise Pancirolus

ad Notit. Imp. Orient c. 115, 141.  See Cod. Theodos. l. ix. tit.

35, leg. 37, with a copious collective Annotation of Godefroy,

tom. iii. p. 256, 257.]

[Footnote 121: See the full and wide extent of their inroads in

Philostorgius (Hist. Eccles. l. xi. c. 8,) with Godefroy's

learned Dissertations.]

[Footnote 122: Cod. Justinian. l. ix. tit. 12, leg. 10.  The

punishments are severs - a fine of a hundred pounds of gold,

degradation, and even death. The public peace might afford a

pretence, but Zeno was desirous of monopolizing the valor and

service of the Isaurians.]

[Footnote 123: The Isaurian war and the triumph of Anastasius are

briefly and darkly represented by John Malala, (tom. ii. p. 106,

107,) Evagrius, (l. iii. c. 35,) Theophanes, p. 118 - 120,) and

the Chronicle of Marcellinus.]

[Footnote 124: Fortes ea regio (says Justinian) viros habet, nec

in ullo differt ab Isauria, though Procopius (Persic. l. i. c.

18) marks an essential difference between their military

character; yet in former times the Lycaonians and Pisidians had

defended their liberty against the great king, Xenophon.

Anabasis, l. iii. c. 2.) Justinian introduces some false and

ridiculous erudition of the ancient empire of the Pisidians, and

of Lycaon, who, after visiting Rome, (long before Aeenas,) gave a

name and people to Lycaoni, (Novell. 24, 25, 27, 30.)]

Chapter XL: Reign Of Justinian.

Part V.

     If we extend our view from the tropic to the mouth of the

Tanais, we may observe, on one hand, the precautions of Justinian

to curb the savages of Aethiopia, ^125 and on the other, the long

walls which he constructed in Crimaea for the protection of his

friendly Goths, a colony of three thousand shepherds and

warriors. ^126 From that peninsula to Trebizond, the eastern

curve of the Euxine was secured by forts, by alliance, or by

religion; and the possession of Lazica, the Colchos of ancient,

the Mingrelia of modern, geography, soon became the object of an

important war.  Trebizond, in after- times the seat of a romantic

empire, was indebted to the liberality of Justinian for a church,

an aqueduct, and a castle, whose ditches are hewn in the solid

rock.  From that maritime city, frontier line of five hundred

miles may be drawn to the fortress of Circesium, the last Roman

station on the Euphrates. ^127 Above Trebizond immediately, and

five days' journey to the south, the country rises into dark

forests and craggy mountains, as savage though not so lofty as

the Alps and the Pyrenees.  In this rigorous climate, ^128 where

the snows seldom melt, the fruits are tardy and tasteless, even

honey is poisonous: the most industrious tillage would be

confined to some pleasant valleys; and the pastoral tribes

obtained a scanty sustenance from the flesh and milk of their

cattle.  The Chalybians ^129 derived their name and temper from

the iron quality of the soil; and, since the days of Cyrus, they

might produce, under the various appellations of Cha daeans and

Zanians, an uninterrupted prescription of war and rapine.  Under

the reign of Justinian, they acknowledged the god and the emperor

of the Romans, and seven fortresses were built in the most

accessible passages, to exclude the ambition of the Persian

monarch. ^130 The principal source of the Euphrates descends from

the Chalybian mountains, and seems to flow towards the west and

the Euxine: bending to the south-west, the river passes under the

walls of Satala and Melitene, (which were restored by Justinian

as the bulwarks of the Lesser Armenia,) and gradually approaches

the Mediterranean Sea; till at length, repelled by Mount Taurus,

^131 the Euphrates inclines its long and flexible course to the

south-east and the Gulf of Persia.  Among the Roman cities beyond

the Euphrates, we distinguish two recent foundations, which were

named from Theodosius, and the relics of the martyrs; and two

capitals, Amida and Edessa, which are celebrated in the history

of every age.  Their strength was proportioned by Justinian to

the danger of their situation.  A ditch and palisade might be

sufficient to resist the artless force of the cavalry of Scythia;

but more elaborate works were required to sustain a regular siege

against the arms and treasures of the great king.  His skilful

engineers understood the methods of conducting deep mines, and of

raising platforms to the level of the rampart: he shook the

strongest battlements with his military engines, and sometimes

advanced to the assault with a line of movable turrets on the

backs of elephants.  In the great cities of the East, the

disadvantage of space, perhaps of position, was compensated by

the zeal of the people, who seconded the garrison in the defence

of their country and religion; and the fabulous promise of the

Son of God, that Edessa should never be taken, filled the

citizens with valiant confidence, and chilled the besiegers with

doubt and dismay. ^132 The subordinate towns of Armenia and

Mesopotamia were diligently strengthened, and the posts which

appeared to have any command of ground or water were occupied by

numerous forts, substantially built of stone, or more hastily

erected with the obvious materials of earth and brick.  The eye

of Justinian investigated every spot; and his cruel precautions

might attract the war into some lonely vale, whose peaceful

natives, connected by trade and marriage, were ignorant of

national discord and the quarrels of princes. Westward of the

Euphrates, a sandy desert extends above six hundred miles to the

Red Sea.  Nature had interposed a vacant solitude between the

ambition of two rival empires; the Arabians, till Mahomet arose,

were formidable only as robbers; and in the proud security of

peace the fortifications of Syria were neglected on the most

vulnerable side.

[Footnote 125: See Procopius, Persic. l. i. c. 19.  The altar of

national concern, of annual sacrifice and oaths, which Diocletian

had created in the Isla of Elephantine, was demolished by

Justinian with less policy than]

[Footnote 126: Procopius de Edificiis, l. iii. c. 7.  Hist. l.

viii. c. 3, 4. These unambitious Goths had refused to follow the

standard of Theodoric.  As late as the xvth and xvith century,

the name and nation might be discovered between Caffa and the

Straits of Azoph, (D'Anville, Memoires de l'academie, tom. xxx.

p. 240.) They well deserved the curiosity of Busbequius, (p. 321

- 326;) but seem to have vanished in the more recent account of

the Missions du Levant, (tom. i.,) Tott, Peysonnnel, &c.]

[Footnote 127: For the geography and architecture of this

Armenian border, see the Persian Wars and Edifices (l. ii. c. 4 -

7, l. iii. c. 2 - 7) of Procopius.]

[Footnote 128: The country is described by Tournefort, (Voyage au

Levant, tom. iii. lettre xvii. xviii.) That skilful botanist soon

discovered the plant that infects the honey, (Plin. xxi. 44, 45:)

he observes, that the soldiers of Lucullus might indeed be

astonished at the cold, since, even in the plain of Erzerum, snow

sometimes falls in June, and the harvest is seldom finished

before September.  The hills of Armenia are below the fortieth

degree of latitude; but in the mountainous country which I

inhabit, it is well known that an ascent of some hours carries

the traveller from the climate of Languedoc to that of Norway;

and a general theory has been introduced, that, under the line,

an elevation of 2400 toises is equivalent to the cold of the

polar circle, (Remond, Observations sur les Voyages de Coxe dans

la Suisse, tom. ii. p. 104.)]

[Footnote 129: The identity or proximity of the Chalybians, or

Chaldaeana may be investigated in Strabo, (l. xii. p. 825, 826,)

Cellarius, (Geograph. Antiq. tom. ii. p. 202 - 204,) and Freret,

(Mem. de Academie, tom. iv. p. 594) Xenophon supposes, in his

romance, (Cyropaed l. iii.,) the same Barbarians, against whom he

had fought in his retreat, (Anabasis, l. iv.)]

[Footnote 130: Procopius, Persic. l. i. c. 15.  De Edific. l.

iii. c. 6.]

[Footnote 131: Ni Taurus obstet in nostra maria venturus,

(Pomponius Mela, iii. 8.) Pliny, a poet as well as a naturalist,

(v. 20,) personifies the river and mountain, and describes their

combat.  See the course of the Tigris and Euphrates in the

excellent treatise of D'Anville.]

[Footnote 132: Procopius (Persic. l. ii. c. 12) tells the story

with the tone, half sceptical, half superstitious, of Herodotus.

The promise was not in the primitive lie of Eusebius, but dates

at least from the year 400; and a third lie, the Veronica, was

soon raised on the two former, (Evagrius, l. iv. c. 27.) As

Edessa has been taken, Tillemont must disclaim the promise, (Mem.

Eccles. tom. i. p. 362, 383, 617.)]

     But the national enmity, at least the effects of that

enmity, had been suspended by a truce, which continued above

fourscore years.  An ambassador from the emperor Zeno accompanied

the rash and unfortunate Perozes, ^* in his expedition against

the Nepthalites, ^! or white Huns, whose conquests had been

stretched from the Caspian to the heart of India, whose throne

was enriched with emeralds, ^133 and whose cavalry was supported

by a line of two thousand elephants. ^134 The Persians ^* were

twice circumvented, in a situation which made valor useless and

flight impossible; and the double victory of the Huns was

achieved by military stratagem.  They dismissed their royal

captive after he had submitted to adore the majesty of a

Barbarian; and the humiliation was poorly evaded by the

casuistical subtlety of the Magi, who instructed Perozes to

direct his attention to the rising sun. ^!! The indignant

successor of Cyrus forgot his danger and his gratitude; he

renewed the attack with headstrong fury, and lost both his army

and his life. ^135 The death of Perozes abandoned Persia to her

foreign and domestic enemies; ^!!! and twelve years of confusion

elapsed before his son Cabades, or Kobad, could embrace any

designs of ambition or revenge.  The unkind parsimony of

Anastasius was the motive or pretence of a Roman war; ^136 the

Huns and Arabs marched under the Persian standard, and the

fortifications of Armenia and Mesopotamia were, at that time, in

a ruinous or imperfect condition.  The emperor returned his

thanks to the governor and people of Martyropolis for the prompt

surrender of a city which could not be successfully defended, and

the conflagration of Theodosiopolis might justify the conduct of

their prudent neighbors.  Amida sustained a long and destructive

siege: at the end of three months the loss of fifty thousand of

the soldiers of Cabades was not balanced by any prospect of

success, and it was in vain that the Magi deduced a flattering

prediction from the indecency of the women ^* on the ramparts,

who had revealed their most secret charms to the eyes of the

assailants.  At length, in a silent night, they ascended the most

accessible tower, which was guarded only by some monks,

oppressed, after the duties of a festival, with sleep and wine.

Scaling-ladders were applied at the dawn of day; the presence of

Cabades, his stern command, and his drawn sword, compelled the

Persians to vanquish; and before it was sheathed, fourscore

thousand of the inhabitants had expiated the blood of their

companions.  After the siege of Amida, the war continued three

years, and the unhappy frontier tasted the full measure of its

calamities. The gold of Anastasius was offered too late, the

number of his troops was defeated by the number of their

generals; the country was stripped of its inhabitants, and both

the living and the dead were abandoned to the wild beasts of the

desert. The resistance of Edessa, and the deficiency of spoil,

inclined the mind of Cabades to peace: he sold his conquests for

an exorbitant price; and the same line, though marked with

slaughter and devastation, still separated the two empires.  To

avert the repetition of the same evils, Anastasius resolved to

found a new colony, so strong, that it should defy the power of

the Persian, so far advanced towards Assyria, that its stationary

troops might defend the province by the menace or operation of

offensive war. For this purpose, the town of Dara, ^137 fourteen

miles from Nisibis, and four days' journey from the Tigris, was

peopled and adorned; the hasty works of Anastasius were improved

by the perseverance of Justinian; and, without insisting on

places less important, the fortifications of Dara may represent

the military architecture of the age.  The city was surrounded

with two walls, and the interval between them, of fifty paces,

afforded a retreat to the cattle of the besieged.  The inner wall

was a monument of strength and beauty: it measured sixty feet

from the ground, and the height of the towers was one hundred

feet; the loopholes, from whence an enemy might be annoyed with

missile weapons, were small, but numerous; the soldiers were

planted along the rampart, under the shelter of double galleries,

and a third platform, spacious and secure, was raised on the

summit of the towers.  The exterior wall appears to have been

less lofty, but more solid; and each tower was protected by a

quadrangular bulwark.  A hard, rocky soil resisted the tools of

the miners, and on the south-east, where the ground was more

tractable, their approach was retarded by a new work, which

advanced in the shape of a half-moon.  The double and treble

ditches were filled with a stream of water; and in the management

of the river, the most skilful labor was employed to supply the

inhabitants, to distress the besiegers, and to prevent the

mischiefs of a natural or artificial inundation.  Dara continued

more than sixty years to fulfil the wishes of its founders, and

to provoke the jealousy of the Persians, who incessantly

complained, that this impregnable fortress had been constructed

in manifest violation of the treaty of peace between the two

empires. ^*

[Footnote *: Firouz the Conqueror - unfortunately so named.  See

St. Martin, vol. vi. p. 439. - M.]

[Footnote !: Rather Hepthalites. - M.]

[Footnote 133: They were purchased from the merchants of Adulis

who traded to India, (Cosmas, Topograph.  Christ. l. xi. p. 339;)

yet, in the estimate of precious stones, the Scythian emerald was

the first, the Bactrian the second, the Aethiopian only the

third, (Hill's Theophrastus, p. 61, &c., 92.) The production,

mines, &c., of emeralds, are involved in darkness; and it is

doubtful whether we possess any of the twelve sorts known to the

ancients, (Goguet, Origine des Loix, &c., part ii. l. ii. c. 2,

art. 3.) In this war the Huns got, or at least Perozes lost, the

finest pearl in the world, of which Procopius relates a

ridiculous fable.]

[Footnote 134: The Indo-Scythae continued to reign from the time

of Augustus (Dionys. Perieget. 1088, with the Commentary of

Eustathius, in Hudson, Geograph. Minor. tom. iv.) to that of the

elder Justin, (Cosmas, Topograph. Christ. l. xi. p. 338, 339.) On

their origin and conquests, see D'Anville, (sur l'Inde, p. 18,

45, &c., 69, 85, 89.) In the second century they were masters of

Larice or Guzerat.]

[Footnote *: According to the Persian historians, he was misled

by guides who used he old stratagem of Zopyrus.  Malcolm, vol. i.

p. 101. - M.]

[Footnote !!: In the Ms. Chronicle of Tabary, it is said that the

Moubedan Mobed, or Grand Pontiff, opposed with all his influence

the violation of the treaty.  St. Martin, vol. vii. p. 254. - M.]

[Footnote 135: See the fate of Phirouz, or Perozes, and its

consequences, in Procopius, (Persic. l. i. c. 3 - 6,) who may be

compared with the fragments of Oriental history, (D'Herbelot,

Bibliot. Orient. p. 351, and Texeira, History of Persia,

translated or abridged by Stephens, l. i. c. 32, p. 132 - 138.)

The chronology is ably ascertained by Asseman.  (Bibliot. Orient.

tom. iii. p. 396 - 427.)]

[Footnote !!!: When Firoze advanced, Khoosh-Nuaz (the king of the

Huns) presented on the point of a lance the treaty to which he

had sworn, and exhorted him yet to desist before he destroyed his

fame forever.  Malcolm, vol. i. p. 103. - M.]

[Footnote 136: The Persian war, under the reigns of Anastasius

and Justin, may be collected from Procopius, (Persic. l. i. c. 7,

8, 9,) Theophanes, (in Chronograph. p. 124 - 127,) Evagrius, (l.

iii. c. 37,) Marcellinus, (in Chron. p. 47,) and Josue Stylites,

(apud Asseman. tom. i. p. 272 - 281.)]

[Footnote *: Gibbon should have written "some prostitutes." Proc

Pers. vol. 1 p. 7. - M.]

[Footnote 137: The description of Dara is amply and correctly

given by Procopius, (Persic. l. i. c. 10, l. ii. c. 13. De

Edific. l. ii. c. 1, 2, 3, l. iii. c. 5.) See the situation in

D'Anville, (l'Euphrate et le Tigre, p. 53, 54, 55,) though he

seems to double the interval between Dara and Nisibis.]

[Footnote *: The situation (of Dara) does not appear to give it

strength, as it must have been commanded on three sides by the

mountains, but opening on the south towards the plains of

Mesopotamia.  The foundation of the walls and towers, built of

large hewn stone, may be traced across the valley, and over a

number of low rocky hills which branch out from the foot of Mount

Masius. The circumference I conceive to be nearly two miles and a

half; and a small stream, which flows through the middle of the

place, has induced several Koordish and Armenian families to fix

their residence within the ruins. Besides the walls and towers,

the remains of many other buildings attest the former grandeur of

Dara; a considerable part of the space within the walls is arched

and vaulted underneath, and in one place we perceived a large

cavern, supported by four ponderous columns, somewhat resembling

the great cistern of Constantinople.  In the centre of the

village are the ruins of a palace (probably that mentioned by

Procopius) or church, one hundred paces in length, and sixty in

breadth.  The foundations, which are quite entire, consist of a

prodigious number of subterraneous vaulted chambers, entered by a

narrow passage forty paces in length.  The gate is still

standing; a considerable part of the wall has bid defiance to

time, &c.  M Donald Kinneir's Journey, p. 438. - M]

     Between the Euxine and the Caspian, the countries of

Colchos, Iberia, and Albania, are intersected in every direction

by the branches of Mount Caucasus; and the two principal gates,

or passes, from north to south, have been frequently confounded

in the geography both of the ancients and moderns. The name of

Caspian or Albanian gates is properly applied to Derbend, ^138

which occupies a short declivity between the mountains and the

sea: the city, if we give credit to local tradition, had been

founded by the Greeks; and this dangerous entrance was fortified

by the kings of Persia with a mole, double walls, and doors of

iron.  The Iberian gates ^139 ^* are formed by a narrow passage

of six miles in Mount Caucasus, which opens from the northern

side of Iberia, or Georgia, into the plain that reaches to the

Tanais and the Volga. A fortress, designed by Alexander perhaps,

or one of his successors, to command that important pass, had

descended by right of conquest or inheritance to a prince of the

Huns, who offered it for a moderate price to the emperor; but

while Anastasius paused, while he timorously computed the cost

and the distance, a more vigilant rival interposed, and Cabades

forcibly occupied the Straits of Caucasus.  The Albanian and

Iberian gates excluded the horsemen of Scythia from the shortest

and most practicable roads, and the whole front of the mountains

was covered by the rampart of Gog and Magog, the long wall which

has excited the curiosity of an Arabian caliph ^140 and a Russian

conqueror. ^141 According to a recent description, huge stones,

seven feet thick, and twenty-one feet in length or height, are

artificially joined without iron or cement, to compose a wall,

which runs above three hundred miles from the shores of Derbend,

over the hills, and through the valleys of Daghestan and Georgia.

Without a vision, such a work might be undertaken by the policy

of Cabades; without a miracle, it might be accomplished by his

son, so formidable to the Romans, under the name of Chosroes; so

dear to the Orientals, under the appellation of Nushirwan.  The

Persian monarch held in his hand the keys both of peace and war;

but he stipulated, in every treaty, that Justinian should

contribute to the expense of a common barrier, which equally

protected the two empires from the inroads of the Scythians. ^142

[Footnote 138: For the city and pass of Derbend, see D'Herbelot,

(Bibliot. Orient. p. 157, 291, 807,) Petit de la Croix.  (Hist.

de Gengiscan, l. iv. c. 9,) Histoire Genealogique des Tatars,

(tom. i. p. 120,) Olearius, (Voyage en Perse, p. 1039 - 1041,)

and Corneille le Bruyn, (Voyages, tom. i. p. 146, 147:) his view

may be compared with the plan of Olearius, who judges the wall to

be of shells and gravel hardened by time.]

[Footnote 139: Procopius, though with some confusion, always

denominates them Caspian, (Persic. l. i. c. 10.) The pass is now

styled Tatar-topa, the Tartar-gates, (D'Anville, Geographie

Ancienne, tom. ii. p. 119, 120.)]

[Footnote *: Malte-Brun. tom. viii. p. 12, makes three passes:

     1. The central, which leads from Mosdok to Teflis.

     2. The Albanian, more inland than the Derbend Pass.

     3. The Derbend - the Caspian Gates.

     But the narrative of Col. Monteith, in the Journal of the

Geographical Society of London. vol. iii. p. i. p. 39, clearly

shows that there are but two passes between the Black Sea and the

Caspian; the central, the Caucasian, or, as Col. Monteith calls

it, the Caspian Gates, and the pass of Derbend, though it is

practicable to turn this position (of Derbend) by a road a few

miles distant through the mountains, p. 40. - M.]

[Footnote 140: The imaginary rampart of Gog and Magog, which was

seriously explored and believed by a caliph of the ninth century,

appears to be derived from the gates of Mount Caucasus, and a

vague report of the wall of China, (Geograph. Nubiensis, p. 267 -

270.  Memoires de l'Academie, tom. xxxi. p. 210 - 219.)]

[Footnote 141: See a learned dissertation of Baier, de muro

Caucaseo, in Comment. Acad. Petropol. ann. 1726, tom. i. p. 425 -

463; but it is destitute of a map or plan.  When the czar Peter

I. became master of Derbend in the year 1722, the measure of the

wall was found to be 3285 Russian orgyioe, or fathom, each of

seven feet English; in the whole somewhat more than four miles in

length.]

[Footnote 142: See the fortifications and treaties of Chosroes,

or Nushirwan, in Procopius (Persic. l. i. c. 16, 22, l. ii.) and

D'Herbelot, (p. 682.)]

     VII.  Justinian suppressed the schools of Athens and the

consulship of Rome, which had given so many sages and heroes to

mankind.  Both these institutions had long since degenerated from

their primitive glory; yet some reproach may be justly inflicted

on the avarice and jealousy of a prince, by whose hand such

venerable ruins were destroyed.

     Athens, after her Persian triumphs, adopted the philosophy

of Ionia and the rhetoric of Sicily; and these studies became the

patrimony of a city, whose inhabitants, about thirty thousand

males, condensed, within the period of a single life, the genius

of ages and millions.  Our sense of the dignity of human nature

is exalted by the simple recollection, that Isocrates ^143 was

the companion of Plato and Xenophon; that he assisted, perhaps

with the historian Thucydides, at the first representation of the

Oedipus of Sophocles and the Iphigenia of Euripides; and that his

pupils Aeschines and Demosthenes contended for the crown of

patriotism in the presence of Aristotle, the master of

Theophrastus, who taught at Athens with the founders of the Stoic

and Epicurean sects. ^144 The ingenuous youth of Attica enjoyed

the benefits of their domestic education, which was communicated

without envy to the rival cities.  Two thousand disciples heard

the lessons of Theophrastus; ^145 the schools of rhetoric must

have been still more populous than those of philosophy; and a

rapid succession of students diffused the fame of their teachers

as far as the utmost limits of the Grecian language and name.

Those limits were enlarged by the victories of Alexander; the

arts of Athens survived her freedom and dominion; and the Greek

colonies which the Macedonians planted in Egypt, and scattered

over Asia, undertook long and frequent pilgrimages to worship the

Muses in their favorite temple on the banks of the Ilissus.  The

Latin conquerors respectfully listened to the instructions of

their subjects and captives; the names of Cicero and Horace were

enrolled in the schools of Athens; and after the perfect

settlement of the Roman empire, the natives of Italy, of Africa,

and of Britain, conversed in the groves of the academy with their

fellow-students of the East.  The studies of philosophy and

eloquence are congenial to a popular state, which encourages the

freedom of inquiry, and submits only to the force of persuasion.

In the republics of Greece and Rome, the art of speaking was the

powerful engine of patriotism or ambition; and the schools of

rhetoric poured forth a colony of statesmen and legislators.

When the liberty of public debate was suppressed, the orator, in

the honorable profession of an advocate, might plead the cause of

innocence and justice; he might abuse his talents in the more

profitable trade of panegyric; and the same precepts continued to

dictate the fanciful declamations of the sophist, and the chaster

beauties of historical composition.  The systems which professed

to unfold the nature of God, of man, and of the universe,

entertained the curiosity of the philosophic student; and

according to the temper of his mind, he might doubt with the

Sceptics, or decide with the Stoics, sublimely speculate with

Plato, or severely argue with Aristotle.  The pride of the

adverse sects had fixed an unattainable term of moral happiness

and perfection; but the race was glorious and salutary; the

disciples of Zeno, and even those of Epicurus, were taught both

to act and to suffer; and the death of Petronius was not less

effectual than that of Seneca, to humble a tyrant by the

discovery of his impotence. The light of science could not indeed

be confined within the walls of Athens. Her incomparable writers

address themselves to the human race; the living masters

emigrated to Italy and Asia; Berytus, in later times, was devoted

to the study of the law; astronomy and physic were cultivated in

the musaeum of Alexandria; but the Attic schools of rhetoric and

philosophy maintained their superior reputation from the

Peloponnesian war to the reign of Justinian. Athens, though

situate in a barren soil, possessed a pure air, a free

navigation, and the monuments of ancient art.  That sacred

retirement was seldom disturbed by the business of trade or

government; and the last of the Athenians were distinguished by

their lively wit, the purity of their taste and language, their

social manners, and some traces, at least in discourse, of the

magnanimity of their fathers.  In the suburbs of the city, the

academy of the Platonists, the lycaeum of the Peripatetics, the

portico of the Stoics, and the garden of the Epicureans, were

planted with trees and decorated with statues; and the

philosophers, instead of being immured in a cloister, delivered

their instructions in spacious and pleasant walks, which, at

different hours, were consecrated to the exercises of the mind

and body.  The genius of the founders still lived in those

venerable seats; the ambition of succeeding to the masters of

human reason excited a generous emulation; and the merit of the

candidates was determined, on each vacancy, by the free voices of

an enlightened people.  The Athenian professors were paid by

their disciples: according to their mutual wants and abilities,

the price appears to have varied; and Isocrates himself, who

derides the avarice of the sophists, required, in his school of

rhetoric, about thirty pounds from each of his hundred pupils.

The wages of industry are just and honorable, yet the same

Isocrates shed tears at the first receipt of a stipend: the Stoic

might blush when he was hired to preach the contempt of money;

and I should be sorry to discover that Aristotle or Plato so far

degenerated from the example of Socrates, as to exchange

knowledge for gold. But some property of lands and houses was